M&A round-up April-May: Foreign firms reap outbound harvest

M&A deals
M&A deals

AZB & Partners was the busiest Indian M&A firm in the months of April and May advising on a total of seven takeovers, followed by Trilegal and Amarchand Mangaldas but foreign firms picked up by far the greatest slice of Indian M&A mega-value deals benefiting from increasing Indian outbound activity.

According to data intelligence provider mergermarket’s data, AZB advised on seven M&A transactions in the months of April and May worth a total of $822m (see table).

Trilegal advised on four worth $257m while Amarchand took home three deals with a disclosed value $1.16bn.

The sale of Piramal Healthcare to Abbott Laboratories for $3.7bn netted rewards for Indian firms Crawford Bayley and Luthra & Luthra, but particularly also for international firms Baker & McKenzie and Stephenson Harwood.

Indeed, a number of foreign firms advised on the lion’s share of the largest M&A transactions with an India element in the last two months.

Total Indian M&A deals and volumes (April & May 2010)
Firm
AZB & Partners
Trilegal
Amarchand Mangaldas
Allen & Overy
Universal Legal
J Sagar Associates
Khaitan & Co

Discounting the Piramal deal, Allen & Overy (A&O) led the pack with two deals worth $1.72bn, according to mergermarket deals data.

One of these was the two months’ second largest deal, as the Hinduja Group acquired Luxembourg bank KBL European Private Bankers from Belgium-based financial services company KBC Group for $1.70bn.

The deal involved exclusively international advisers with A&O advised the seller, while independent Benelux-international firm Loyens & Loeff bagged the mandate for the Hindujas.

A&O’s second deal, on which it advised jointly with Trilegal, was its instruction on the $24m CLSA buy of Equitas Micro Finance India, which had instructed Universal Legal.

Universal Legal also acted for another microfinance company, Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance, in which AZB-advised US venture capital firm Matrix Partners took a $23m stake.

Another massive India-related deal without Indian law firm involvement was the $1.34bn purchase of Anglo American Zinc by Hindustan Zinc.

Irish firm A&L Goodbody and Linklaters advised the seller Anglo American with Dewey & LeBoeuf and African firm Corpus Legal Practitioners stepping in for Hindustan Zinc.

The $339m purchase of a 40 per cent by Reliance Industries in the US natural gas field Marcellus Shale owned by Atlas Energy, also involved only non-Indian firms: Jones Day, Ledgewood Law Firm and Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz for the target and Vinson & Elkins for Reliance.

The largest purely domestic deal was Paras Kuhad Associates’ client Bank of Rajasthan getting bought out by Amarchand client ICICI Bank for $618.

Other sizable deals included Alstom and Schneider Electric buying of Areva T&D for $429, on which Amarchand advised the bidders; as well as Godrej Consumer Products’ buy-out of its joint venture with Sara Lee Corporation, where Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Trilegal shared the mandate.

AZB also assisted the National Stock Exchange of India in its 5 per cent stake sale to Temasek Holdings for $175m.

J Sagar Associates (JSA) meanwhile bagged the $104m Glodyne Technoserve buy of US-based IT support services company DecisionOne and the $42m acquisition by Essar Group of networking company AGC Networks.

[UPDATE:] Kirkland & Ellis and Rajani Associates acted as corporate counsel to Glodyne.

Comments

Anonymous guest 15 Jun 2010, 20:40
+0 -0
ALMT M & A team wt is it doing ? sleeping....LOL
kianganz 15 Jun 2010, 20:47
+0 -0
ALMT did advise on Cobra Beer's buy of Iceberg Industries with AZB in late May. However, no value for the transaction was disclosed to we did not include it in this write-up.
Anonymous guest 15 Jun 2010, 23:50
+0 -0
JSA advised Temasek for purchasing the 5% stake in NSE
Anonymous guest 16 Jun 2010, 17:43
+0 -0
Kian, By M&A do you also mean PE deals? If yes then I expect the numbers to be different.
kianganz 16 Jun 2010, 18:25
+0 -0
We used mergermarket's list and data for this, which does include PE deals but only if there is a change in ownership. This is their criteria:

"The mergermarket database includes Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) where there is a transfer in ownership of an economic interest in an ongoing business concern."

"Based on announced deals, including lapsed and withdrawn bids.
Based on geography of either target, bidder or seller company being India
Includes all deals valued over $5m. Where deal value not disclosed, deal has been entered based on turnover of target exceeding $10m.
Activities excluded from table include property transactions and restructurings where the ultimate shareholders' interests are not changed."
Anonymous guest 27 Jun 2010, 04:12
+0 -0
Why is it that the deal value is considered to be a mark of the complexity of the deal? Is it because deals involving larger sums of money are naturally more complicated and hence indicative of a firm's expertise or is it because the larger the deal, the larger the value (as a percentage) which the firm will receive? Or is it simply because it is the most conveniently available data which can be utilised for this purpose.

I would think that a better measure could be some sort of index which takes into account other factors which go into making a deal complex and hence making this kind of ranking a better indicator of a firm's expertise in the area.