We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Nothing wrong at all if he lives in luxury. We don’t want our leader to be some Mahatma Gandhi fakir baba type, wearing a loincloth.
https://x.com/SauravDassss/status/2084928475769762073
https://x.com/Pamphlet_in/status/2084917108845293945
https://x.com/Pamphlet_in/status/2084868025472467044/
Everything else trade, litigation, corporate etc you can just acquire-hire at higher salary.
Sad to see how Suhail messed it up with his need to control despite not being a top 3 biller. If he had just lets the economics reflect in the management and let Rohit take over as RS’ rightful heir none of this would have happened.
Magar yeh to koi na jaane
Maybe this answers
Sociology was meant to complement economics by researching into issues like how government policies are working on the ground, what problems are faced by rural communities in areas like health, education etc. Instead, it’s become a farce. Instead of doing serious research, people write articles sitting in their desk lazily bashing capitalism and the non-left, calling them fascists etc. And of course non stop gender politics insisting that men can give birth etc.
Although they are promising a "fair" enquiry, such an enquiry looks tough as the case has become the ultimate academic culture war. Depending on whether you follow the right-wing or the left-wing, this man is either an intellectual giant being defamed by racists, or a woke fraudster. Nothing in between. My guess is that the enquiry committee will take some middle ground. Ask him to go on compulsory leave without pay for 1 year, but reinstate him thereafter.
https://x.com/AITC_Parliament/status/2084929023113908495
It is neither the students, nor the CJI who called it that - it got entrenched because of the continuous reporting surrounding NLS.
Please stop with the TAE crap. Today, there was a session in which the instructor was repeatedly asking what debt and equity means, there were hundreds of people on the call and not one person answered. Do you really think we are listening? Do you think the pressure and timelines for our deliverables are such that we can listen? TAE is a waste of time and money for the firm.
Lukewarm regards,
Associate