We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Helpful because it gives a good suggestion as to the direction you might want to take in your career. In fact, it gives you a pretty clear roadmap!
Unhelpful because it is a paradigmatic situation of doing the working correctly but still arriving at the wrong answer. Therefore, only 3/5 in my book, I am afraid. At the end of the day, all manner of skills, experiences and abilities can serve as helpful indicators as to how or why you may make a great commercial lawyer to a recruiter. Chess can equally be one of those skills. Indeed, one of my best friends is a trainee at Linklaters London office (also got a TC offer from Clifford Chance) who mentioned having played chess competitively representing her uni on her law firm applications and they were quite impressed by it.
So by all means: develop your skills in a practice area. But do and talk about other things that make you memorable. Loads of folks follow this exact roadmap which this response to which I am responding has suggested. If your application can be the one which follows this roadmap and adds to it by talking about your chess experience and if you have done well, then so much the better for you, I'd have thought... after all, that extra thing is what sets you apart from the others.
NB: I don't play chess so don't understand it and what you might have achieved in it. (Tried to play when I was younger but somehow couldn't take much interest in it.) Therefore, the only thing I'd add is to take this advice I have given with some caution if you haven't done awfully well in chess, and you don't see any prospect of yourself doing so in the future.
My primary motive of asking this question can I replace my non nlu with something else that can be seen as sign of intelligence. My college is decent at best
But To be competitive at law firm application that why i consider it to put in my cv to been seen as other sign of intelligence and grit other than college rank and nlu status