We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The whole basis of the protest was that both Muslim and Hindu Bangladeshis should be allowed to claim citizenship of India as refugees, not just Hindu Bangladeshis.
This individual needs to do his LLB all over again
As the partners at high posts cannot now spin it into an opportunity for appellate litigation, how do they break the news of adverse final decree to the client? Have you seen clients walk away? How is the blow softened (other than by blaming the counsel)?
Which people in your hypothetical case would surely have.
First take into account school hours which pretty much every child has to go through, and moreover a few additional hours with a nanny before your parents come home will not wreck a child's psyche.
Second, your parents are not your personal servants, if having a househelp frees up their time to spend with their kid, how does it concern you? Moreover after a certain age if you cannot make yourself a basic meal, maybe consider that you have bigger issues to deal with
Third, bit of an overstatement to assume that they are too busy for their children you don't know individual circumstances or conditions
fourth, the workload eases up as they move up the ladder
1. Once you're done with court, dust it. You get cheap clothes brushes on amazon, use those. You can even use a clean shoe brush for this;
2. Dry-clean at least once a year (twice, if you are able to);
3. If possible, hang it to air out at the end of each court day.
4. Stay clear of people who smoke and wave their cigarettes around.
Honestly, if your practice is going to be mostly in the Delhi High Court, then you needn't wear a gown for about half the year (typically between Holi and Dussehra/Diwali)
pls drop the tailor's name or address
It's the same story in the central paramilitary forces. And let's not even talk about the mistreatment meted out to Tibetans who volunteered for the SFF. Despite all the big talk, as a nation we are an ungrateful lot. That includes that chest thumping nationalist jingo brigade too.
From what I have gathered, this is what most of the Partners/SA end up thinking of interns. But honestly, if you are treating the interns as expendable resources that if deemed 'not worthy' within the first week... how am I, as an intern, supposed to improve? Please understand that I am coming from a perspective of a 4th year student who has done an internship ata few big firms. Unfortunately, I am unable to see any big improvement in the work I am presenting to my partners.
At best, my work is given a few words review of 'fine', 'good' or 'thanks'. Whenever I have actively asked for feedback I have recieved very minnimum feedback or with blatant but polite 'sorry i dont have time'. It might be a unique situation but at this point if i do not imrpove my work to the level of an A0 atleast, i do not see how i can secure a PPO.
The little improvement i have seen is by comparing my drafts with my senior co interns, or at times when i have been able to get my hands on the drafts made by the assosciates.
I could go on and state (just top of my head) at least 10 examples of partners who are well connected/ privileged and made it big at Tri.
Fine, admitted that it runs unlike a lala firm
But note that nothing is a true meritocracy. No law firm. It’s just not possible. Trilegal partners have sheltered and promoted promoted plenty of family members and kids who come with decent connections to get the firm more business. Having said that, they have also promoted some who come from nothing and have made it to the ranks based on just talent and luck.
But please get your facts checked before you make such bold claims.
Divya J has moved to New York. Mahir and Arihant are doing very well in their careers with their current employers and have made the most of the exposure they received at the chambers. Harshvardhan is thriving at Lumiere. Sabari has started his own practice though he isn't a specialist in tax. I am sure there are many others whom I may have missed.
Brilliant counsel but join at your own risk. Very difficult to work with. Extremely high, impenetrable standards. This is my personal view.
His Admin head is called Neeta maybe reach out to her?
For decades, India’s top corporate families, including the Tatas and several other high-net-worth groups, have relied on Karanjawala as their preferred counsel for complex dispute-resolution strategy. Its stature in the litigation ecosystem firmly places it in the Tier-1 bracket.
That said, entry into Karanjawala whether as an intern or a full-time associate is extremely connection-driven. The firm traditionally recruits through strong recommendations, deep professional networks, and high-level references. Compensation is known to be attractive, but the firm maintains complete confidentiality regarding its pay structure; salaries are rarely discussed publicly.
Kinda considered an illuminati lawfirm, very secretive and doesn’t try to bring into public attention a lot.
Even the Tatas and many of India’s elites considers Karanjawala as their got to place for dispute resolution matters.
is there any chance of ppl?
Never heard stories of his office being toxic in any sense.
The NLUs, being state universities, have an even tougher situation to deal with - completely orphaned and abandoned by their respective state governments. On top of that, they cannot do anything outside the state. For instance, NLS cannot even host an international conference in Delhi, India's legal capital/hub.
One possible explanation for such writing that comes to mind is that the juniors of such lawyers come to occupy prominent positions in the Bar whenever such writing takes place. This likely necessitates the
RJ and NS are the key rainmakers for the tax team.
Ahmedabad litigation is headed by Hardik OG.
In Mumbai, litigation is handled by Gopal, Parth, Chirag, and Geenita.
In Delhi, litigation is handled by Udit, Kumar and Arihant. They have hired new faces at AP level also. So I don't see any impact.