We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I would suggest please try not to make such errors and build trust
The MP seems like a decent humble guy unlike his immediate competitors mainly the splitted brothers.
However, they do occur. At the junior level, the usual reason is non-performance, which can include lack of sufficient availability on several occasions (e.g., if Associate X is constantly turning down work, not billing enough, being unavailable beyond usual office hours (which like it or not, comes with territory)), shoddy work (weak or insufficiently rigorous legal analysis on advisory mandates or litigation -- the extreme example of which includes misapplying statutes, using obsolete statutes, overlooking major precedents, etc., as well as the more garden variety lack of attention to detail, sloppy writing (bad English, incorrect grammar, syntax) -- by reference to class-year linked benchmarks. Senior lawyers typically expect juniors to learn on the job, consistent with lawyering being an apprenticeship-based profession, and the inability and/or unwillingness to learn (particularly, learn from one's mistakes) over and over, can cause performance issues. Repeating the same mistakes is the textbook example of a performance issue that warrants eventual firing. The less common reason is lack of personality fit (e.g., lack of polish, demonstrated and repeated inability or unwillingness to play well with colleagues - both senior and junior). Sometimes, it could also simply be a function of there not being enough work to justify keeping someone on, though firms tend to be a lot more loathe to layoff attorneys for temporary economic reasons.
As a senior, the rope becomes much smaller. And business case can become a stronger basis for layoffs. Without knowing which year you are, and the kind of firm you work in (I can only speak to the so-called Tier 1 firms, having worked in two of them, but understand that recruitment and termination modalities materially vary), it is difficult to state any more conclusively.