We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
bring back the epee
The newly appointed deans and their portfolios are:
- Arup Kumar Poddar (Undergraduate Studies)
- Sandeepa Bhat B (Postgraduate Studies)
- Lovely Dasgupta (Research)
- Anirban Mazumdar (Student Affairs)
- Shameek Sen (Alumni Affairs, Outreach, & Communication)
Thoughts?
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/new-vc-move-in-a-first-nujs-gets-5-deans/articleshow/125771992.cms
And where did you hear about the expansion bro? It's a lie. They pay the lowest in Kolkata and hire the least. You can check this on multiple posts here and ask the people working there presently. I would suggest not to, unless you can afford to risk the chance.
https://www.ndtvprofit.com/trending/inr-hits-90-radhika-gupta-says-you-may-need-rs-10-crore-just-for-your-childs-us-degree
It's definitely not easier. An engineer from IIT likely outdoes you on most of these parameters, while also being able score better in CAT than you because of the grip they hold over DILR and Quants.
There are firms/chambers where no matter what if you have finished work early or don't have too much work for that day, you're supposed to be in a office till a certain minimum time.
There's only work and that is life.
"Where is the order of the Government of India declaring them (Rohingyas) as refugees? Refugee is a well defined legal term and there is a prescribed authority by the Government to declare them. If there is no legal status of a refugee, and somebody is an intruder, and he enters illegally, do we have an obligation to keep that fellow here?" remarked the CJI.
Taking objection these remarks, particularly the equation of Rohingya refugees to “illegal intruders digging tunnels” to enter India, the former judges have written to CJI Kant, stating,
“The remarks from the bench are contrary to core constitutional values. They have had the effect of dehumanizing Rohingya refugees whose equal humanity and equal human rights are protected by the Constitution, our laws and by international law.”
Objection has been taken particularly to the bench's reported statements questioning the legal status of the Rohingya as refugees, equating them with intruders illegally entering India, the references to persons who dig tunnels to enter illegally, the questioning whether such entrants are entitled to food, shelter and education, the invocation of domestic poverty as a reason to deny basic constitutionally guaranteed entitlements to refugees and the suggestion that they be spared third degree measures, in their treatment in India.
https://x.com/LiveLawIndia/status/1996885548103762314
https://www.livelaw.in/amp/top-stories/supreme-court-former-judges-advocates-cjar-open-letter-to-cji-surya-kant-over-unconscionable-remarks-on-rohingya-refugees-312375
The winner would be Modern Barakhamba from which half the Delhi High Court is (Sanjay Kaul, Rajeev Nayyar, Rajiv Shakdher, Neeraj Kaul, Ajay Bhargav, Buddy Ranganathan, etc) and DPS RK Puram with Salman Khurshid, Gaurav Agarwal, Abhishek Malhotra, Arjun Lall, Gauri Rao, Anuj Bhuwania, Ashwin Ramanathan, etc)
I’m definitely not an early riser to realising that WLB > More Money.
As a law student, I was just about the cha-ching. But as I’m graduating, now I’m in a place where long hours are A NORM. Even though I might earn good, I would like to reach home at a respectable time and get other shit done. Hope some of you can relate.
This is not about comfort or being lazy, I have seen too many health issues due to stress and long working hours. Long working hours are cool when there is an execution or a filing or any urgent business but daily? Pls no.
If you all can please help me by putting your company, timings/ working hours and team.
Eg - xyz & Co. , 9-7pm, m&a
Law firms and In House people, please help a lad out.
Also whats up with everrrrrrryyyyyone and their uncles talking about MH now? Judge, lawyer, article, foreign partners, whats up!!
Doing well but I need to know what is to be done in the next 2.5 years in order to secure a good placement offer from a good chamber. The problem I'm facing is that my NLU is a fairly new university and we don't really have any alumni choosing the road not taken (CBSE reference).
I don't want to indulge myself with law firms in general because I'd rather prefer peanuts over compromising my growth as an advocate. (I thank god and my parents for making me able to take this option)
I know it's unrealistic for me to wish to earn a living despite being a first-gen advocate and opting for litigation but there must be some place in Delhi giving fair remuneration.
So far I'm targeting AOR offices (given I liked their work culture) and/or senior advocate chambers where they have their in-house AORs. I want to become an AOR and set up my own chamber 10 years down the line.
O wise people of LI, enlighten me with your wisdom as you've done for the past few years.
There was a corporate lawyer in ▮▮▮ who was regularly donating mega bucks to the TMC through electoral bonds right from the time that scheme was introduced.
This was even reported by Legally India, and nothing came of it.
Naturally, you'd assume he must have been some ultra-connected senior equity partner with decades of experience under his belt. But let me bring you back to reality. At the time, he was a newly minted partner at a ▮▮▮-one ▮▮▮ corporate firm—▮▮▮
There's a lot going on under the hood.
Ye India hai, bhai/ bahen !
Or is it more likely to fail because manufacturers like Apple won't implement it? https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/what-is-indias-politically-contentious-sanchar-saathi-cyber-safety-app-2025-12-02/
Cheapo Indian / Chinese phone makers probably won't care though.
However, they do occur. At the junior level, the usual reason is non-performance, which can include lack of sufficient availability on several occasions (e.g., if Associate X is constantly turning down work, not billing enough, being unavailable beyond usual office hours (which like it or not, comes with territory)), shoddy work (weak or insufficiently rigorous legal analysis on advisory mandates or litigation -- the extreme example of which includes misapplying statutes, using obsolete statutes, overlooking major precedents, etc., as well as the more garden variety lack of attention to detail, sloppy writing (bad English, incorrect grammar, syntax) -- by reference to class-year linked benchmarks. Senior lawyers typically expect juniors to learn on the job, consistent with lawyering being an apprenticeship-based profession, and the inability and/or unwillingness to learn (particularly, learn from one's mistakes) over and over, can cause performance issues. Repeating the same mistakes is the textbook example of a performance issue that warrants eventual firing. The less common reason is lack of personality fit (e.g., lack of polish, demonstrated and repeated inability or unwillingness to play well with colleagues - both senior and junior). Sometimes, it could also simply be a function of there not being enough work to justify keeping someone on, though firms tend to be a lot more loathe to layoff attorneys for temporary economic reasons.
As a senior, the rope becomes much smaller. And business case can become a stronger basis for layoffs. Without knowing which year you are, and the kind of firm you work in (I can only speak to the so-called Tier 1 firms, having worked in two of them, but understand that recruitment and termination modalities materially vary), it is difficult to state any more conclusively.
One in three Other Backward Class households across India maintains a lifestyle and assets representing the highest and second highest wealth brackets, the latest national family health survey has revealed.
While 36 per cent of OBC households are in the highest and second highest wealth quintiles, this proportion is 26 per cent for Scheduled Castes, and only 13 per cent for Scheduled Tribes, the NFHS 2006 has said. The proportion of general category households is 58.5 per cent.
“As far as economic status is concerned, the OBCs are much better off than the SCs or STs,” said Kamala Gupta, professor of urban studies at the International Institute of Population Sciences and chief co-ordinator of the survey.
The proportion of wealthy OBCs has become a controversial issue since the government announced last year it would introduce 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in educational institutions. While anti-reservation activists have been demanding a reservation system that takes into account wealth, the government has maintained that it is not in favour of excluding “creamy layer” OBCs from reservations.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/rich-list-fodder-for-quota-fire-1-in-3-obcs-is-wealthy/cid/675668
Yes reservations should reviews. But to say that over 5000 years of caste based discrimination can be nullified with 75 yrs of reservation is a bit of a stretch. We aren't talking about certain SC and ST groups hogging the civil services and then playing dirty tricks to stop other SC, ST claimants from rising.