Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Other
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Deals
Courts
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences


Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?
An estimated 1-minute read

WSIS+10 Zero Draft: Highlights from India’s Statement at the 2nd Preparatory Meeting

 Email  Facebook  Tweet  Linked-in

The WSIS+10 Review process is currently at its 2nd Preparatory Meeting Phase. India’s statement at the meeting captures it’s key concerns. India stated that the zero draft reflects the views of the members states and is a balanced document. However there are a few key aspects that need to be addressed.

Effective Participation and Substantive Inclusion: The recognition of effective participation, especially balanced representation of developed countries is imperative. Barriers to participation and inclusion need to be remembered, and the objective should be that of substantive inclusion

Digital Divide: Bridging the Digital Divide requires the WSIS to move beyond access and focus on affordability. There is great need for focus on joint research and development between countries to promote ICT access. The needs and aspirations of the next billion must be factored in the review process. An institutional funding mechanism is needed to bridge the digital divide.

Critical Internet Resources: The outcome document must reference uniform distribution of critical internet resources across regions of the world.

IGF: The unique role of IGF  is recognised and India calls for the IGF  and related processes to adhere to highest levels of inclusiveness, transparency and openness. The CSTD should facilitate and aid in this process.

It also called for creating a mechanism where governments can seek clarification on public policy issues particularly national security issues where governments are primarily responsible. It further considered the mapping on internet governance issues across UN bodies to aid in better coordinated efforts.

More updates to follow from New York.

Stay tuned!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Original author: gangeshvarma


Latest comments