Going through various write-ups on different law related sites, mine may appear very lame to many legal professionals working in the esteemed organisations. However, there will be many who can totally relate to my situation. I am a law professional currently working with a MNC as their Employment Lawyer. It is a great place to work but maybe I require more than just a great employer.

I did my graduation from a good college but not from National Law School. When I joined my course I was very enthusiast and keen to learn the different verticals of law with an ambition to become an elite professional. In my second year I came across this differentiation, for the very first time, Students from National Law School and students from some third tier school. Sadly, I belonged to the second race. This became very prominent while applying for internships or when we use to go for some conferences or competitions, the treatment was different. No issue with that, cause we ourselves have seen the difference but still the good are only few and rest are just like us. Now the placements, obviously the story remain the same. However, some of my batch-mates were hired by top law firms, inspite of the alumnae from the third tier Law School, which was really great.

I always thought that Law is same for everyone but still the professional field is divided into many verticals like students from National Law Schools, then professionals working in Law firms and in-house Counsel, barriers never end. Whenever I see a job-post in some law-firm they only ask for Lawyers from Law-firms and some precisely ask for National Law School. Are they super-human being, they never commit any mistake or what is so special about them which the other professional is lacking? Only because some don’t have NLS as their graduate school, are rejected without being interviewed. Why to be so judgmental, you never know you find a gem underneath coal. At least give chances to the deserving profile, why to reject professional cause they are not from Law-firms or from NLS. We can only learn theory from our colleges but a practical exposure is required and unless an opportunity is not given, one cannot prove its metal.

It is a task for me to make a shift in my career. I want to go back from being an In-house counsel to Law firm, to have more work exposure to learn more about restructuring laws and dispute resolutions. But this drive seems quite impossible for me but I am not a giver and let’s see when I achieve what I thrives for.

Comments

JustCTFO 11 Mar 2016, 10:49
+0 -0
Calm your tits dude. Everything will be alright. YOU, more than ANYBODY ELSE, needs to stop believing that you belong to or are a product of "some third tier school".
Lol 11 Mar 2016, 14:00
+0 -0
Your arguments really sound lame.
Lol 11 Mar 2016, 14:09
+0 -0
There is a huge amount of difference between the quality of education that is imparted in top law schools and lower rung law schools. The entrance test to these institutes also makes sure the high quality of students. So, if you really believe that the placements in lower rung law schools should be as high as top law schools, then probably you should think once more.
Random 11 Mar 2016, 16:38
+0 -0
Did you even read it or just commenting to write some random thing. Because a student is from NLS does not make him/ her deserving, one is required to prove themselves. Yes, NLS has given some awesome legal luminaries to our Industry that we are really proud of, but I have met some dumb-headed also. This is not to criticise some one, but to remove the difference. Judge someone by there skills and not from where they studied. Interview someone and then reject, fair enough. This is India and competition is tough, some did not get admission because of one marks does not make them less deserving. You're getting a chance, some are not. And this is not about 1-tier-or 2-tier schools, people from 3-tier schools are also placed in good/top law-firms..cause they got chance to prove themselves..proved that even such students also have metal.So this is all about a chance to represent ourselves and not a fight between non-NLS and NLS student. "PEACE"
Random law school 12 Mar 2016, 13:52
+0 -0
I have seen one of the worst lawyers coming out of an N tagged law school with zero knowledge of the procedural laws of the land. So stop thinking that you come from a second or third tier law school. Intact, I don't belong to a National law school and have ended up teaching procedural laws to the people who passed out from the National Law schools.
Nalsarite 14 Mar 2016, 12:09
+0 -0
Why are we generalizing all law schools with the tag of National Law School? Why are you giving such an unnecessary acclaim to National Law School? What is so special about it? Why couldn't you say not from a Nalsar equivalent college?