Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA)

My CGPA just went up. *celebrates*

No, it’s not because I started studying more or anything. My law school just found out that they needed to be more lenient in their marking system to ensure that I get a job.

Unbelievable? Well, it’s happening so better believe it.

In the last few years many law schools have changed their grading system and made them more lenient. Law schools see higher grades as one way to rescue their students from unemployment. Perhaps even to protect their reputation and ‘rankings’.

Till now we have seen a lot of tactics that law schools adopt to ensure better recruitment for their students. Some of them organize recruitment camps early, some of them treat their recruiters lavishly etc.

Grade inflation is probably the most dangerous of these tactics. Imagine everyone’s grades going up. No change in study time or preparatory material or papers. Parents will be happy, in the beginning, and why not, their son/daughter is scoring well. A first class in law school was not that easy to come till some time back but their son/daughter has a first class in almost all subjects. Happy parents, happy students and happy college. Erm, just tell me one thing, if everyone is getting good grades then how will you differentiate between the good students and the bad students? The recruiters will be or should I say, are in a fix. They always look at the CGPA first. (Mistake?) So if my college gives CGPAs out of 10 and half of the class is above 8.5 then does that mean that no one is even mediocre, leave alone bad?

“If somebody’s paying $150,000 for a law school degree, you don’t want to call them a loser at the end,” says Stuart Rojstaczer, a former geophysics professor at Duke who now studies grade inflation. “So you artificially call every student a success.”

Harvard, Stanford and Yale do not have grading systems. They now follow a pass/fail system. This again creates problems for recruiters. But then according to me it the fault of the recruiters to judge a student by CGPA alone, so its fine. I guess if law schools here do that then more emphasis would come on the other activities, the articles, the moots, the internships and as always, Jugaad. Is that good or bad?

If all the law schools start doing it then the status quo will not change. The problem starts when the grades reach such a level that the college cannot increase it any further. So there will be a time when all the colleges will have the same average grades. How cool na? No need for rankings. India Today and Outlook, are you listening? We will have no other choice but to go for the pass/fail system then.

So basically it’s a stupid system. I am sure none of the law schools will change but yes this is something that students and prospective recruiters have to look after. Some of the recruiters keep track of such things but others don’t and so are easy conned.

This will take time and so all of us will pass (with good grades, I must add). If this continues then the future is definitely not bright.

My CGPA just went up. *Oh damn!*

Disclaimer:

I did not think of this on my own. These are not my powers of observation. I read about it at a random blog which I don’t remember now. It had the US law school perspective to it. I wrote an Indian law school one. The link given in the comments is the NY times link that has similar news.

Comments

Anonymous guest 29 Jun 2010, 03:04
+0 -3
You moot, you debate, you have articles published and then you have girls (and two or three exceptional guys) who're almost nonexistent but cram all the law they won't ever understand and then they score a little better.

Doing away with grading systems will be a great approach provided colleges develop a system where "improvement" is rewarded.
rushab 29 Jun 2010, 06:12
+0 -0
Beautiful article. Its something that I will keep in mind before I join my Law school.

"Holistic development" is what i think you are trying to stress upon.
napster 29 Jun 2010, 13:58
+0 -0
@1- We do not actually have a system where 'improvement' is rewarded. Suggest some way if you have something in mind. Our's is purely a cram based system.

@2- Thank You. Good luck. :)
napster 29 Jun 2010, 17:34
+0 -0
@1- We do not actually have a system where 'improvement' is rewarded. Suggest some way if you have something in mind. Our's is purely a cram based system.

@2- Thank You. Good luck. :)
Anonymous guest 29 Jun 2010, 20:20
+0 -0
increasing cgpa by distributing more marks is the most horrible thing that a NLU can do................but we all know...........as a matter of fact they do.........the first batch or may be the second batch get a bit less marks........but suddenly from 4th year even their cgpa increases............it is a short term solution for a long term problem............quality law teaching by able and qualified faculties............it is same as printing more money by the government to pull the country out of recession.........and we all know what happens next.............a super inflationary situation like in zimbabwe..........
Anonymous guest 29 Jun 2010, 20:47
+0 -0
I wish nujs administration is reading this. when several other law schools are making grading liberal, NUJS under the Brave leadership of the Brave One has introduced a so-called bell curve. Though it was intended to check the alleged inflation of marks by some teachers, in application, it has meant dismally low grades for everyone including the toppers. Brave indeed.
Anonymous guest 30 Jun 2010, 16:18
+0 -0
Awesome article. *still glares at her grades*
I really liked this one. Dunno where law school is headed to. I didnt know yale and harvard had only pass system. coolio che!
Anonymous guest 1 Jul 2010, 20:43
+0 -0
Anonymous guest 5 Jul 2010, 00:34
+0 -0
My CGPA just went up again, marginally *YAY!*

And, it did so after defying the NUJS implemented bell-curve the last 2-3 semesters. Still, I find myself graded way harder than my brethren at other law schools.

This sucks. One just hopes recruiters aren't fools.
Anonymous guest 5 Jul 2010, 17:22
+0 -0
In Law Schools, Grades Go Up, Just Like That :

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/business/22law.html
Anonymous guest 5 Jul 2010, 20:43
+0 -0
I don't mean to open a can of worms again, but you should compare grades at places like NLSIU and NALSAR (I haven't checked NUJS so don't know). NALSAR has almost everyone scoring really high whereas NLSIU seems to have a more standard marking system. Marks are generally on an average on the lower side but we do have high toppers.

Seems NALSAR just inflates its grades to be able to get a better package at the end of the day. Wonder how long it'll last.
Anonymous guest 6 Jul 2010, 22:38
+0 -0
on a fun note... CGPA at NUJS also means Community/Computer Gamers Players Association. It conducts CS and AOE championships.
Anonymous guest 11 Jul 2010, 17:42
+0 -0
When Cypress Hill sang "What's your number?" didn't you know he meant what's your CGPA? ;)

It defines you as a person baby... Well, almost.
vineet20005 25 Jul 2010, 04:08
+0 -0
hats off tooo u boss u wrote da reality
Anonymous guest 25 Jul 2010, 05:07
+0 -0
good one
Anonymous guest 25 Jul 2010, 05:13
+0 -0
Nicely written article. The probability of one getting recruited in an organization should not be a function of CGPA. It should be purely based on how he/she performs in the interviews. Hope they get to know about whatever you have written so that they don't give too much importance to CGPA :)
napster 4 Aug 2010, 01:03
+0 -0
Thank you all for the appreciation. :)
Anonymous guest 12 Aug 2010, 15:48
+0 -0
"My CGPA just went up. *celebrates*

No, it’s not because I started studying more or anything. My law school just found out that they needed to be more lenient in their marking system to ensure that I get a job. "

Awesum dude...... luvd dis line..... gr8 work