The CLAT Committee continues to make blunders as if it is CLAT 1.0. In their desperate efforts to hide the skeletons tumbling out, they end up letting some more out. Shakespeare would have written sequel of comedy of errors had he been alive. The latest in the line is about university/college allotment.

The CLAT Committee came up with the first seat allocation, seemingly for UG candidates yesterday, i.e., 9.6.2015. But what about PG candidates, are they secondary, not worth their time. The PG candidates have not even been informed that when their allotment list will be out.

Latest Notice on website says allotment done though PG allotments haven’t been done yet

The notice on the website says that first allotment has been done but doesn’t differentiate between PG and UG.

Payment for Counselling Fee to be made during 10th June-13th 2015, June while PG candidates still don’t know their allotments

It is difficult to understand that how PG candidates would pay the counselling fee for their seat without knowing their allotment.

Few PG Candidates login account shows that they have not got any seat

I know a few candidates who are amongst top 200 rankers in CLAT PG but despite that the screen which appears after logging in on CLAT’s website shows that they have failed to procure a seat in the first allotment list.

This is ridiculous, shameful for the CLAT and discouraging and disappointing for the student. Please sort things out.

KAMLESH SHARMA

Comments

Pg 10 Jun 2015, 08:54
+0 -0
@Kamlesh,
after nearly 70 calls, finally I get in touch with the operator. He stated that, no one is above our expert committee, we have finally made the correction, nothing to be done now.
I went to court today, but in courts are colsed due to summer vacation, only one bench is hearing bail matters,
my application for early petition was not looked at upon
what should we do ::??
Rj 10 Jun 2015, 10:55
+0 -0
It is very unfortunate that they are not coming up with the entire merit and allotment "list" as mentioned in the clat calendar and counselling guidelines. Mere indication in the respective accounts would not make it a transparent process and also I suppose against the High Court's order.
CLAT 2015 PG 10 Jun 2015, 10:56
+0 -0
I just don't understand why such careless attitude? They are not replying to any phone calls, letter or mails. When you call them, they have a standard reply ''ab Jo b discrepancy ho, result revise nai hoga''. Such grave injustice and arbitrariness!
AB 13 Jun 2015, 11:10
+0 -0
Extend fee deposition date till 15/06/15.
AB 13 Jun 2015, 11:11
+0 -0
For PG candidates.....please.