•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences
  An estimated 4-minute read

Special Courts Under the Companies Act, 2013 Notified

 Email  Facebook  Tweet  Linked-in

To provide speedy disposal of offences punishable under the Companies Act, 2013, which are punishable with imprisonment of 2 years or more, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs has notified the provisions dealing with ‘Special Courts’ with effect from 18 May 2016. The intention behind setting up these courts is to let magistrate courts try minor violations, and that graver offences should be dealt by Special Courts.


Existing courts in the State of Maharashtra, Jammu and Kashmir, Goa, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, and Union territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, have been designated as Special Courts for the purposes of trying offences under the Companies Act, 2013. As per the notification, these courts have been designated for the purposes of trial of offences punishable under the Companies Act, 2013 with imprisonment of 2 years or more.


As per the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, following offences are triable by Special Courts:

(i)        offences for which the Companies Act, 2013, provides for imprisonment of 2 years or more;

(ii)       cases forwarded by a Magistrate (where he thinks detention is unnecessary) for any offence committed under the Companies Act, 2013. This provision will come into play when a person is arrested and detained in custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of 24 hours as required under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is well-founded, and detention is authorized by Magistrate for a period not exceeding 15 days (if ordered by Judicial Magistrate) or 7 days (if ordered by Executive Magistrate), as the case may be. In such cases, the Special Court has the same power as the Magistrate having jurisdiction to try such case;

(iii)     take cognizance of an offence under the Companies Act, 2013, without the accused being committed to it for trial upon: (a) perusal of the police report of the facts constituting such offence, or (b) if a complaint has been filed in that behalf;

(iv)     try at the same trial an offence for which an accused may be charged under CrPC in addition to an offence under the Companies Act, 2013;

(v)       if the Special Court thinks fit, it may try in a summary way, any offence under the Companies Act, 2013, which is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years, provided that in the case of any conviction in such trial, person cannot be sentenced for imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year.


Notably, for the purposes of entertaining appeal and revision, the High Court have been granted jurisdiction, as if the Special Court within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the High Court were a Court of Session trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the High Court.

Offences Under the Companies Act, 2013, for Which Minimum Punishment is 2 Years or More

Sr. No. Offence Who is Punishable Section
  False declaration of solvency by a Director during voluntary winding up Director 305(4)
  Intentionally and fraudulently concealing material information about the company, relating to properties, debts, creditors, financial statements from the Company Liquidator during winding up Officer (including any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company have been accustomed to act) Section 336(1)
  Fraudulently misrepresenting material information about the company to the Company Liquidator during winding up
  Taking in pawn or pledge or otherwise receipt of the property, knowing it to be pawned, pledged, or disposed of wherein such property was pawned, pledged or disposed off (in 12 months preceding the commencement of the winding up) on credit and not been paid for and was not in the ordinary course of business Any person who does such act knowingly Section 336(2)
  Commitment of fraud provided fraud in question involves public interest Any person found guilty of such fraud Section 447
  Intentionally giving false evidence upon any examination on oath or solemn affirmation, authorised under the Companies Act, 2013 Any person giving such false evidence 449
  Intentionally giving false evidence in any affidavit, deposition or solemn affirmation, in or about the winding up of any company under the Companies Act, 2013, or otherwise in or about any matter arising under the Companies Act, 2013
Disclaimer: The information provided in this update is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal opinion or advice. Readers are requested to seek formal legal advice prior to acting upon any of the information provided herein. This update is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or corporate body. There can be no assurance that the judicial/ quasi judicial authorities may not take a position contrary to the views mentioned herein.
Click to show 2 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.