Archived forum thread. This discussion is preserved for posterity from the Legally India Topical forum and is no longer active.

Re-issue of Passport with Corrected wife's name / assumed wife is incorrect and current wife has filed for divorce

restofindia 25 Jul 2014, 19:54

Applicant is seeking re-issue of corrected Passport which is pending for re-issue due to reference for Policy Act case no Title Suite 07/13 in family court, Patna where assumed wife is incorrect and legally wedded wife has filed for Divorce with fake charges on Applicant. Applicant admits that there been a mistake on the part of applicant by entering the name of Richa as wife under anticipation in the year 2004 during the course of reissue of replacement Passport at RPO, Patna. Applicant visited RPO Patna on multiple occasions and tried to correct this mistake in a natural way and was responded by concerned RPO Patna department to produce a death certificate or divorce certificate. The department of RPO Patna also responded to take no action unless a death certificate or divorce certificate is produced. Applicant would like to ask and question if there is absolutely no way of correcting a mistake that just happened once in assumption and is getting prolonged and dragged for which there is really no other proof in any part of the world that Richa was really married to Applicant. Applicant is also ready to pay any fee / fine for conducting a thorough investigation whether assumed wife Richa actually existed in any relationship with Applicant.

Passport fact file:

1. That original Passport AXXXXXXX was issued on 20/02/1998 from Bangalore as unmarried under the Name Applicant. This passport was valid until 19/02/2018 and was somehow misplaced and was untraceable by applicant. Applicant reapplied for passport in the year 2004 and was granted a replacement passport EXXXXXXX on 17/08/2004 from RPO, Patna valid until 19/02/2008. In this Passport wife name Richa Kumar was added. Applicant would like to know the documents required and documents submitted in the year 2004 under the Passport Act of Indian Union as a proof of Richa as wife in the replacement Passport.

2. That applicant again reapplied for Passport in the year 2007. Applicant was issued a replacement Passport GXXXXXXX on 26/10/2007 from RPO, Patna with Richa Raushan as wife. Applicant would like to know the documents required and documents submitted in the year 2007 under the Passport act of Indian Union as a proof of Richa as wife. Applicant would also like to know documents required and documents submitted in the year 2007 as a proof of change of title for Richa from Richa Kumar to Richa Raushan in the case of assumed wife.

3. That Applicants brother was issued similarly Passport Number EXXXXXXX on 20/08/2002 from Patna as marital status single. Again during the re-issue of Passport Number KXXXXXXX, he was requested all possible documents along with Marriage certificate.

4. That applicant admits that there been a mistake on the part of applicant by entering the name of Richa as wife under anticipation in the year 2004 during the course of reissue of replacement Passport. Applicant visited RPO Patna on multiple occasions and tried to correct this mistake in a natural way and was responded by concerned RPO Patna department to produce a death certificate or divorce certificate. The department of RPO Patna also responded to take no action unless a death certificate or divorce certificate is produced. Applicant would like to ask and question if there is absolutely no way of correcting a mistake that just happened once in assumption and is getting prolonged and dragged for which there is really no other proof in any part of the world that Richa was really married to Applicant. Applicant is also ready to pay any fee / fine for conducting a thorough investigation whether assumed wife Richa actually existed in any relationship with Applicant.

5. That applicant’s legally wedded wife and also a witness to Title Suite 07/13 has filed for divorce under Matrimonial Case No. 837 / 2013 and Complaint Case No. 3667/C/2013. Applicants wife and father in law have refused to co-operate to be a witness any longer as if they were ignorant of the Case No. 748/2012 and Title Suite 07/2013.

Please review and include them as it is necessary. Please email your response to me also.

0 Replies

No replies.