Case no.1- bank fraud case & Case no.2- 500 ipc.

case 1-a bank fraud case no.1, the actual doer is the complainant( branch manager), the police station was well managed by complainant. within one year of framing of charges-one of the accused filed an affidavit in case no.1 wherein it contains

truthful facts/circumstances whereby the fraud has taken place & its related matters etc.as per the complainant the content of affidavit is baseless/frivilous/& false. The same accused distributed the referred affidavit to few staff members who were also issued show-cause notice from the bank for their negligence related to fraud; they are the same who are also witness to this case as per chargesheet, all witness statement contents(in show-cause reply as well in police statement are as per the complainant desire, hence the truth has been supressed/ & the investigation officer turned a blind eye toward the actual doer. for the said distribution to staff members Complainant files case no. 2 defamation(500ipc), prior notices were mere drop anonymously at accused door-step. the reason which accused stress upon his distribution to convey a caution in good faith to one person against the another, provided the caution is intended for the good to those whom it is conveyed.

NOW, can the distribution be covered under certain EXCEPTION ? thanks