HOW TO BRING BACK THE GLORY, REPUTATION AND RESPECT FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND
In today’s Competitive times, there is a concern for falling standards and lack of skills (Theoretical and Practical).
How can it be stopped?
How can we change the situation?
In old times, one used to spend time in practice under a Senior Advocate and learn.
But, today the Young generation has become so impatient that the moment they step out of the college,the only thing that they look for is to somehow earn some money and in this fight to survive and competition, learning remains just an eyewash.
Its sad to see that one the most important and Life-saving Profession of Legal practice is earning a bad name and reputation and general public has lost all the respect and image of a lawyer today is tarnished beyond repair.
Time is running for everyone who is a part of the Legal Profession in some way or the other.
What can we do?
regards
Namitabh
9930992661
1 Reply
Namitabh is very correct in his assessment of the reasons that are responsible for the falling standards in the legal profession. The problem in my view is fundamental. The provision of legal services by way of appearance or advice till recently was considered as a profession. However, of late, the professional approach has been replaced with a business approach. No one really can be blamed for the shift.
The requirement of legal services has increased manifold due to the changing socio-economic matrix. More and more businesses need legal advice/services. Even individuals have become more conscious of their legal rights for which they seek the services of a lawyer/law firm. A professional approach contemplates years of learning and training under the guidance an able senior. On the other hand the commercial approach requires provision of services as per the requirements of the service seeker within the prescribed time periods. Everything needs to adhere to the timeline fixed for a matter or a transaction. There is no scope for extended learning, what is required is precise execution. Therefore, you have large law firms with hundreds of young lawyers, many of whom may not have had more than 5 years of experience in dealing on their own. However, this model ensures that the service seeker gets what he desires in terms of quantity. This commoditisation of legal services is primarily responsible for the falling standards of the legal profession. Even otherwise, the hundred of young lawyers churned out by the mushrooming law schools have not professional learning and training as their aim but big pay packets. Therefore, you would see that instead of choosing to join a considerate and able senior for a meagre sum, many of the fresh law school graduates would throng to join the legal division of corporate houses, LPOs and law firms against hefty pay packets.
Unfortunately, the current trend is likely to continue since overnight you cannot produce enough numbers of qualified, trained and experience lawyers. Therefore, the focus will remain fixed on delivery of timely services rather than on delivery of quality services. The legal divisions in corporate houses may not be all that interested in improving the quality of legal professions for what they are only concerned with is the product. However, conscious and responsible law firms may help in thwarting the rot by persuading youngsters to spend more time on professional development and pupillage apart from discharging functions of a purely commercial nature.