Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi accused the SCBA of “crass commercialisation and periodic auctioning and re-auctioning”, on its decision to rename the Supreme Court’s “Dr LM Singhvi library” to “Dr Awadh Behari Rohatgi library” after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, instead of Singhvi, ended up donating the money required for the library’s renovation this year. Bar & Bench reported that in addition to this accusation, Singhvi also alleged that the SCBA had possibly “squandered” the Rs 20 lakh he had donated for the library in 2009.
According to the B&B report, Singhvi said:
“In 2008 and 2009 they took Rs. 20 lacs from me. I gave it with happiness for the service of the Bar. I had also asked them to keep the money locked in corpus, so that it is not squandered for dinners and lunches. It was not done. Till 2014, nothing happened.”
The SCBA had in May asked for Rs 20 lakh from Singhi to renovate the library, but after he had allegedly qualified the donation with four conditions the association had decided to strip the library, named after his late father, of its title. Rohatgi has now donated Rs 25 lakh toward the library’s renovation and the library will be renamed after his late father.
SCBA president PH Parekh told B&B:
“[Singhvi’s] daily income is more than Rs. 20 lacs. If it was a lawyer who did not have money, we would not have asked for a single penny. It is when he set out those four conditions that we decided that enough was enough. […] It is not a question of payment but about the conditions he imposed. He said that he will pay Rs. 20 lacs but he will dictate the terms. We felt very hurt by that and did not like it. By imposing a condition that an inaugural ceremony should be held, he was trying to show his money power. So, the point is that we did not like the way in which he troubled us for a couple of months before agreeing to pay and then imposing those conditions.”
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
Dr. Singhvi is well within his rights to see where his money will be spent.
but to dictate terms for an amount which is pittance for him speaks very low of him.
A lot is left to be said about the recent events and the leadership of the SCBA. The stand taken by the SCBA belittle the contributions of late LM Singhvi to the profession and SCBA itself. Mr. Singhvi was himself a president of the SCBA during its formative golden years and if not mistaken he was elected by the "Supreme Court Lawyers" (the real practicing ones) themselves for about 5 terms. Also please remember that Late Mr. Singhvi was a person respectable enough to be given a full court reference by the Delhi, Rajasthan High Court and the Supreme Court itself, lest anyone doubt his credentials and contributions.
The "alleged" quote in B&B is shameful,disgraceful. What does the earning of Dr. AM Singhvi has got to do with honoring Late LM Singhvi who is a person who truly deserves to be honored. If what is quoted is true does it mean that a person who truly deserves to be honored (someone like Late LM Singhvi) will not be honored merely because his descendants are paupers. The Supreme Court should take up the issue and put the house in Order.
Highhanded Extortion by SCBA!
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first