Fali wins Justice Dave's recusal in NJAC hearing

Mint reported that Justice Anil R Dave, who’s heading the five-judge constitution bench that will hear challenges to the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, today recused himself from the case:

The move came after senior lawyer Fali S Nariman, who represents lawyers body and petitioner Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association, raised an objection. He argued that after a 13 April notification by the government which brought into force the NJAC Act, Justice Dave became part of the commission whose validity has been challenged.

Attorney general Mukul Rohatgi called the objection raised by Nariman “unfounded” and “completely condemnable”.

Comments

AbS 15 Apr 2015, 11:31
+10 -0
Technically, Mr. Nariman's objection is right. Technically, someone preaching propriety to Supreme Court judges must also himself recuse from practicing law in a court where his son is a judge. Just my two cents.
Watching from Bombay 15 Apr 2015, 11:48
+1 -0
Agreed. But if we were to follow proprietary in the right earnest, leading lawyers by the dozens will have to shift base.
AbS 15 Apr 2015, 11:55
+7 -0
Perhaps. But then, is proprietary relevant only when convenient?
God is Great 15 Apr 2015, 13:38
+1 -3
Nariman is senile. he has no sense of propriety. god hates hypocrites. we need katju back.