Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Other
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Deals
Courts
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences


Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

Clueless Trump judicial nominee flunks basic legal knowledge, withdraws: Could a similar judicial appointments process be a good idea in India?

A video of Donald Trump’s nominee for US federal court judgeship getting grilled by a Republican senator, who is an ex-law professor, and failing to answer basic question of law has gone viral, resulting in Matthew Peterson withdrawing his name from contention.

See the rather amusing video below, via the BBC.

While India’s Supreme Court collegium has made moves in being a bit more transparent in its appointments, wouldn't it be great if it could conduct and publish similar video interviews of Indian judicial hopefuls? Then again, preferably parliamentarians wouldn't be involved (which would likely make the process ridiculously political), but fellow senior judges very well could get carry out such an exercise.

Or, in light of the huge number of judicial vacancies, would the process take too long and too few future judges would pass the tests? And would it make the judiciary lose far too much of its mystery in the process?


Latest comments