Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Other
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Deals
Courts
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences


Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

BMR wins for Shell, as BHC follows Vodafone transfer pricing precedent

The Bombay high court Tuesday ruled in favour of the Indian arm of Royal Dutch Shell on two transfer-pricing adjustments made by the income tax department - of Rs 15,000 crore and Rs 3,000 crore for 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively - to the taxable income of Shell India Markets Pvt Ltd (SIMPL).

BMR Legal managing partner Mukesh Butani acted for Shell, instructed senior counsel Percy Pardiwala.

Butani said in an emailed statement:

The Shell India case decided by the Bombay HC is a significant development. It follows the earlier judgment of Vodafone insofar as principles are concerned - the principle being that issuance of shares by an Indian company to its foreign parent is not eligible to transfer pricing provisions as there is no income arising therefrom.

The High Court held today that the legal principle laid down by the Bombay HC applies in the Shell case and rejected the departments argument that the facts of Shell case were distinguishable from Vodafone’s case.

The said decision is a welcome relief not just for Shell but for all MNC’s who have faced the adjustment on share issuance. It is significant to note that the court did not hesitate on exercising its extraordinary power to issue a writ where alternate appeal remedy was available - in this situation as the court felt that the tax department clearly exceeded its jurisdiction to bring to tax a capital transaction.”

Last month, the court had ruled in favour of the Indian subsidiary of Vodafone Group in two similar cases of transfer-pricing adjustments of over Rs 4,500 crore made by the income tax department.

Transfer-pricing describes the practice of arm’s length pricing for transactions between group companies based in different countries to ensure that a fair price is levied.

The tax orders passed against Shell and Vodafone relate to alleged undervaluing of shares issued by the Indian subsidiaries to their parent companies.

The income tax order against Shell India relates to the issue of 870 million shares, at Rs 10 each, by the firm to an overseas group entity, Shell Gas BV, in 2009.

The income tax department challenged the valuation methodology and put the value of the shares at Rs 180 a share, adding the difference to the taxable income of Shell India.

In the other case, the income tax department issued a show-cause notice followed by an order to Shell India, adding over Rs 3,100 crore to its taxable income for the 2009 fiscal.

Click to show 1 comment
at your own risk
(alt+shift+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 link ? 21 Nov 14, 15:05
copy of the decision ?
Reply Report to LI


Latest comments