•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences


05 August 2015

The government is seeking to amend the Whistleblower Protection Act passed during the Congress-led UPA regime by introducing 10 categories of exemptions. The amendment Bill has already been passed by Lok Sabha in the Budget session and faced the ire of opposition parties for introducing exemptions, reported the Economic Times and others.

The new proposals exempted matters related to sovereignty, strategic, scientific or economic interests of India or the incitement of an offence. Also excluded are deliberatiosn of the council of ministers, things that are "forbidden to be published by a court", information received from foreign governments and information that would "impede a probe".

The bill is currently under consideration of the Rajya Sabha where it was listed for passing on Tuesday and has caused concerns with activists.

RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak had under the RTI Act accessed the cabinet note with the proposal, which justifies the changes by stating: "In the absence of any restrictions... the provision confers an absolute right on the whistleblower to make disclosures..."

Nayak told the ET: "The government has taken all the categories exempted from disclosure under RTI Act lock stock and barrel into the Whistleblowers Protection Bill. Now it becomes almost impossible for a whistleblower to disclose anything which has not been accessed under RTI Act."

Legally India reported on May 6, 2015 that the cabinet approved the amendments in the Whistleblowers Protection Act.

18 September 2014

The NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, today declined to name the whistleblower who disclosed the alleged interference by Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Director Ranjit Sinha in the 2G investigation and prosecution after meeting the accused in the 2G and coal scam cases.

The CPIL, in its affidavit filed Thursday, said that its governing body in its meeting Sep 17 decided not to reveal the identity of the whistleblower who took off the lid on the alleged interference in 2G matters by the CBI director. The NGO’s governing body consists of advocates Anil Divan, Colin Gonsalves, Shanti Bhushan, Kamal Jaswal, Kamini Jaiswal and Prashant Bhushan, reported *Mint].

The NGO said this in response to the Sep 15 order of justices HL Dattu and SA BobdeRead more at: , who, citing the Supreme Court Rules 2013, had asked the NGO to disclose the identity of the whistleblower who gave it the information on the basis of which the averments and allegations were made against the CBI director. [Source]