The four most senior Supreme Court judges were, in an unprecedented move, “left with no other option” but to call a press conference after their private meeting with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra earlier today apparently failed to yield desired results for them.
Addressing the press the second-most senior judge Justice Jasti Chelameswar (who won’t be the next CJI) said that “we went to the CJI with a letter a few months back for a particular thing to be done in a particular way. That thing was done but in such a way that it raised further questions and left too many questions and doubts about the judiciary. Again today morning we went [...] but we failed to convince [the CJI]”, according to the NDTV broadcast of the press conference.
The conference was called by justice Chelameswar and justices Ranjan Gogoi (the next CJI from 2 October 2018), Madan B Lokur and Kurien Joseph at Chelameswar’s residence.
The judges didn't directly confirm the subject of the request they had made to the CJI, which they said they had “failed to convince him” about, but they did not deny that it could also be related to the Supreme Court's probe into (and long omerta over) the allegedly suspicious death of CBI judge Brijgopal Harkishan Loya, who died unexpectedly before he was finished hearing the Sohrabuddin encounter case.
Though NDTV's news anchor repeatedly surmised that “judge Loya case appears to be the trigger” for the press conference, and cited justice Gogoi as saying “yes” in response to the question whether this had to do with the Justice Loya case, Justice Chelameswar also spoke about their earlier letter to the CJI.
Former Supreme Court Justice RS Sodhi said that he was “pained” that a press conference had to be called by SC judges and that despite a difference of opinion within the collegium earlier “no one went to the press. This is appalling”.
Senior advocate KTS Tulsi said that “sunlight is the best disinfectant” and commented to NDTV: “They are saying that all these issues which arise in public mind are to be dealt with the highest principles of natural justice one of which is that you cant be a judge in your own cause.”
The letter
The letter that was addressed by these four judges to Misra suggests that as “master of the roster” the CJI had not exercised his power to assign cases to various benches in accordance with conventional rules of bench composition and strength.
The judges stated in the letter:
Any departure from the above two rules would not only lead to unpleasant and undesirable consequences of creating doubt in the body politic about the integrity of the institution. Not to talk about the chaos that would result from such departure.
We are sorry to say that off late the twin rules mentioned above have not been strictly adhered to. There have been instances where case having far reaching consequences for the nation have been assigned by the chief justices of this court selectively to the benches “of their preference” without any rationale basis for such assignment. This must be guarded against at all costs.
They indicated that a memorandum of procedure (MoP) which had already been finalised in a Supreme Court order 2016 in the AOR Association case before it, and was sent to the government which to date has not commented on it. In the absence of the government's action the MoP stands as law by virtue of being ordered as such by the Supreme Court, and that there was no reason to make observations in a separate case in October 2017 to turn back the process and delay the MoP's adoption.
In November 2017, CJI Misra had overturned an order passed by justice Chelameswar, who had referred a Medical Council of India (MCI) scam to a constitution bench of the top court. Snubbing Justice Chelameswa, CJI Misra said that he was the master of the roster adding that judges could not assign matters to themselves, reported Janta Ka Reporter and others.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
I've been particularly surprised to see the government make statements the night before the privacy judgment, and then again the night before the recent national anthem re-order, as though they were aware or they had notice that the SC would postpone Aadhaar-linking and make national anthem non-mandatory in cinemas, respectively.
Or am I reading too much into things? :)
In all democracies, the party in power in order to get its way puts people at the helm of various institutions to be biased to them. This does not mean annihilation, on the contrary it means to behold the democratic principles as the party would like to deliver on what it has promised to the larger public by not having unnecessary hurdles being put in place.
It is only when this power is utilized in an offensive manner, for people to be worried. It is only when the discretion is not used but the entire decision (which would have otherwise been given) marred, that we must all stand up and speak.
Till then, enjoy the show.
I don’t think one needs to draw political analogies.
You're right, it could just be more effective PR and prediction on the government's side or perhaps the new AG who's more proactive, but I'm still not convinced that there aren't more direct channels of communication that have opened between government and CJI in recent months...
Check the article indianexpress.com/article/opinion/web-edits/pv-sindhu-caste-google-search-silver-medal-india-rio-olympics-2987174/.
The Indian system still works on religion, class, caste, communities and such ugly things which is the ugly truth.
Strangely while people are making remarks regarding the SC tilting in favour of the BJP, on the same day the daughter of the former Congress chief minister Vibhadra Singh, has been appointed as the Chief Justice of Manipur.
Instead of trading barbs regarding the political affiliations, steps should be taken to select impartial / apolitical judges.
1. He was the first case to rebel....anything first is always cursed
2. He was alone who did it as against a group....majority is right minority is wrong....
3. He followed procedure....following procedure is not the surest way
4. He did not have any support
5. He belonged to the opressed scheduled caste
Justice Chelameshwar is NOT in line to be CJI - his term expires before Justice Misra's. Justice Gogoi is next in line to be CJI. Please correct the article.
Sorry, the first comment you posted did not arrive for some reason :(
Have updated the story.
Here's a fun diagram about the next successions at the SC.
via: www.legallyindia.com/supreme-court/the-chief-justice-of-india-birthday-lottery-or-if-you-only-see-one-cji-related-infographic-in-the-next-8-years-let-it-be-this-one-20160518-7603
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first