•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences

SC to hear Cong's Ramesh, Chidu, Sibal challenge Aadhaar: Why was it passed as a money bill?

The Supreme Court today agreed to hear the plea of Congress leader Jairam Ramesh who has challenged the propriety of the government introducing the Aadhaar law as a money bill, and asked Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi to address the court on the issue.

The apex court bench of Chief Justice TS Thakur, Justice R Banumathi and Justice UU Lalit asked the Attorney General to address the court on the issue as senior counsel P Chidambaram told the court that presenting the proposed Aadhaar Act as a money bill was unconstitutional.

Appearing for Jairam Ramesh, who moved the public interest litigation, Chidambaram -- senior counsel and himself a former union finance minister -- told the apex court that some bills are called finance bills and very few bills would qualify as money bills.

After passing the Aadhaar bill in one house (Lok Sabha), the government got it passed in the other house (Rajya Sabha) as a money bill and that is unconstitutional, he said.

The court fixed 10 May as the next date of hearing as senior counsel Kapil Sibal told the court that Chidambaram being a former finance minister would be in a better position to address the court on the issue. Therefore, it should be heard when he is also present.

Click to show 3 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.