Tata Power hopes to utilise the proceeds of this PE investment for the acquisition of coal mines and reduction of outstanding debt in the SPVs.
AZB capital markets partners Shameek Chaudhuri was assisted by associate Vinay Kurein and led the team for the Tata company.
Desai & Diwanji Mumbai partner Apurva Diwanji advised private equity firm Olympus Capital Holdings on the Indian law aspects.
Milbank Singapore partner Naomi Ishikawa and Purrington Moody Weil founding partner Nick Purrington, who is based in North Carolina, were international counsels to the private equity firm.
The deal entails issuing new shares with differential rights to Olympus Capital.
According to the company statement, Tata Power holds interest in the KPC and Arutmin coal mines in Indonesia through the SPVs. In June 2007, Tata Power had acquired a 30 per cent stake in these coal mines for $1.225bn.
Subject to regulatory approvals, the investment is one of the biggest private equity deals of the year according to financial news website VCCircle.
AZB, Desai & Diwanji fire up Olympus $300m PE stake in Tata Power assets
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
Milbank would have given foreign law advice, which Indian law firms are not allowed to. In multi jurisdiction transactions, there will be more than one law firm advising on the law relating to their respective jurisdiction.
(and that teleconferencing argument was just awesome! (you..mooter i guess?..i scooter!)
i am sick of all conversations on legally india being dragged to the entry of foreign law firms to india issue!!!
Now if I go to singapore and take advice its fine. but if i am in delhi and a "foreign" lawyer advises me through video conferencing on then i think the advocates act applies. this act was framed 50 years ago when this was not possible so it needs to be updated.
i wonder what SILF, balaji, gopal subramanium and the anti-liberalisation lobby has to say about this.
@7- If you call them HUF, all members of the HUF(read associates) will have coparcenary rights and will be able to call for a partition anytime (which again goes against the whole reason why you want to call it a HUF and not a partnership!). Also, if you have so much angst, why dont you start your own stuff and see whether you want to dilute your holding in it (pl note i have nothing to do with any family run firm (actually or allegedly!)
as for your pathetic defence of the family law firms, the less said the better,
Lets learn smthin!! not just argue argue n argue! Indian Companies are turning truly global! How can we avoid deal related advice frm foreign law firms! ?
There will be oppositions! Time has come.. we all shld equip ourselves to give tough competition to our competitors and also see that the spirit of 'justice' be upheld thro our actions and thoughts!(by availing our clients d best advice!)
I may pls be guided/corrected if I have gone overboard!
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first