Location, location? / Issue 97

Legally India newsletter
Legally India newsletter

The lawyers of five-years-from-now by most accounts had a harrowing weekend.

Sunday’s Common Law Admissions Test (CLAT) – the decider of who gets into 11 national law schools - was impossible to complete in the time allotted and hence mostly a matter of luck, complained many test takers who frantically circled random answers towards the end of the paper.

Semi-random CLAT results could have an advantage though in spreading the often self-perceived talent pool more evenly between law schools, which in the long term would ensure the growth of all nationals and encourage law firms to hire from more than just the top few.

From that perspective NLU Delhi’s move to hold its own entrance exam is shrewd – although there are question marks over whether this complies with the Supreme Court order that first introduced CLAT.

Strictly going by numbers of applicants to seats available, getting into NLU Delhi is now as hard as getting into one of the three most popular CLAT schools: out of almost 8000 applicants, less than 1 per cent made the cut-off mark.

While this does not tell the whole story and some students may not take up their offers opting for other CLAT schools, it is good evidence of just how popular NLU Delhi has become in such a brief space of time.

And it may also point to how important location is in the success of a law school – studying in India’s litigation capital Delhi is bound to help with internship applications and attracting recruiters, which is something that some of the more far-flung new NLSes have complained about. Which leaves one to wonder about the thinking behind possible locations of the contentious NLS Maharashtra for example, leaving aside politics.

The locational advantage also helped the first batch of Christ College Bangalore in placing its first batch of students with a respectable cross section of recruiters, according to the students.

Sponsored post: BarHacker’s secret of 100% bar exam pass rate and how we can offer a money back guarantee again

With court and college holidays many lawyers are enjoying a well-deserved break, although deal activity remains strong – see below.

Nevertheless, the Competition Commission is all-go and has decided to allow informal discussions pre-merger control filings after all. And FoxMandal has absorbed a boutique practice in London and Paris although details of the deal are sparse.

Please also welcome our new associate moves column, that will follow the careers of friends and colleagues in the profession. This week: An air law team for JSA and a Links lateral move in the US.

Email us a one-liner at to let us know if you have recently joined a new workplace.

Deals of the week

Blogs of the Week

Best of Blowgs

**To get future newsletters straight to your inbox every Friday for free, please enter your name and email below. **

Comments

Legal Poet II 20 May 2011, 15:48
+5 -0
[b]Does a lengthy and tough paper favour 'lucky' candidates?[/b]


[b]I DO NOT think it does.[/b]


[b]Case I:[/b] I am intelligent. I have the speed! I solve 180 questions and leave 20 for guesswork.

[b]Case 2:[/b] I am dumb. I lack speed. I solve 150 questions and leave 50 for guess work.


[b]Who'll score more?[/b] The intelligent guy who attempted more and guessed less, of course!


A lengthy, tough paper does the job of separating wheat from the chaff! That is why you have such entrance tests.

How did you arrive at the contrary, Kian?
lex suprema 20 May 2011, 15:53
+0 -1
well......if competition and speed was the answer to everything...then..
Legal Poet II 20 May 2011, 15:58
+1 -0
Another thing:

Its CLAT. I have practiced, prayed and paid (a hell lot) for this day!

CLAT starts.

20 minutes are over. I see I have attempted questions worth a very few marks.

I have to speed up.


40 minutes. I see my watch. I decide my strategy.
60 minutes. I see my watch. I decide my strategy.
80 minutes. [do]
100 minutes. [do]
120 minutes. [do]


Time management is a huge skill in life, right?

In CLAT, those who could think on their feet, will score well. In court, the lawyer who thinks on her feet wins!

CLAT didn't favour luck. CLAT favoured those with inherent qualities required to be successful in law and in life.

Hopefully, the law school will nurture and develop these qualities.
Legal Poet II 20 May 2011, 16:03
+0 -0
[b]@ Lex Suprema:[/b] Not competition (but collaboration) and not speed (but direction) are...according to me are...more important.

But we don't have these inbuilt in our education/evaluation system. No one has, actually.

:(
Not So Poetic 21 May 2011, 19:20
+2 -1
Yeah. No one except the Poet.
unni 23 May 2011, 13:32
+1 -0
article request: jairam ramesh has said that IIT/IIM faculty is basically s***. pls do a feature on faculty and the so-called great NLUs and their publications.
location & placements 24 May 2011, 05:49
+1 -0
LOCATION...
same reason why GLC still does extremely well in placements. 42 firms & corporates + 8 counsels..beats any n school i think, in terms of pure numbers..in spite of GLC being in a mess administratively..
but again these firms & corporates come from a much wider range than just amarchand, azb, khaitan, etc...
also why GLCites opt for signing up articles in their 4th year for solicitor's..coz firms are a 10 minute walk from the college...