By
Prachi Shrivastava
Tuesday, 05 March 2013 22:36Law schoolsAn estimated 4 minute read...
Kumar: New registrar
Nalsar Hyderabad has left behind it the dramatic events of last year that culminated in the resignation of its then-vice chancellor (VC). An investigation by the Andhra Pradesh bar council has now exonerated senior faculty members who were alleged to have enjoyed financial and administrative privileges under the previous administration, while the controversial post of dean of academic affairs has been abolished, and Prof Vijender Kumar has been appointed as registrar.
Background
In early 2012 Legally India had published a judicial committee report dated September 2011 that accused Nalsar’s then vice chancellor (VC) Veer Singh of favouritism, financial irregularities, abuse of authority and presiding over gross academic indiscipline.
The committee’s findings were based on complaints lodged by Nalsar students and faculty, and interviews with the constituting Supreme Court and high court judges.
The report, when revealed through Legally India’s right to information (RTI) request, also mentioned Nalsar professors Prof KVS Sharma and Vijender Kumar as beneficiaries of Singh’s alleged abuse of power.
Sharma was accused of having used a car owned by the school for personal business, while Kumar was mentioned in relation to 14 allegations, including illicit financial gain from university funds, leakage of exam papers, and enjoying administrative roles out-of-turn.
Bygones become bygones
In July 2012 the judicial report was placed before Nalsar’s academic council, which constituted an inquiry committee headed by the chairman of the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh, Narsimha Reddy.
Reddy absolved both Sharma and Kumar of all charges, stating in his report: “It is very clear from the judges committee report that no notice or personal opportunity was given to the professors concerned seeking their explanation with regard to the above charges.
“After going through the charges and the explanation offered by the concerned professors […] I am of the considered opinion that charges levelled against the professors are not sustainable.”
The report was accepted by Nalsar’s executive council.
Current Nalsar VC Prof Faizan Mustafa who took over from Singh in March 2012, told Legally India that Kumar was the first “regular registrar” in the history of Nalsar.
Unlike previous registrars, who had been appointed at the discretion of the then officiating VC, Kumar was found by a search committee constituted by the executive council, after a national newspaper advertisement for the position was published in June 2012, said Mustafa.
The search committee comprised of Mustafa, former RMLNLU Lucknow VC Balraj Chauhan, NUJA Assam VC Prof Gurjeet Singh, and the Lokayukta of Karnataka Bhaskar Rao.
The final shortlist of three also included Andhra Pradesh HC assistant registrar BV Satyanarayana and Lal Bahadur Shastri University constitutional law professor Prof AS Ramachandran.
Mustafa: De jureAid grants
It is understood that Kumar’s appointment could save the university between Rs 15 and 20 lacs per year as against registrars hired externally, who would have demanded higher salaries.
“Nalsar is facing financial constraints, also because a number of courses were stopped last year. The revenue [from those courses] was not there,” said Mustafa, adding that around Rs 1 crore of revenue was lost due to the courses’ scrapping.
Nalsar received a University Grants Commission (UGC) sanction for almost a Rs 9 crore grant after the UGC late last year again allowed central funding of national law schools, as reported by Legally India.
Mustafa said that under UGC rules more than Rs 1 crore from that amount had lapsed because of non-utilisation before 31 March 2012, despite it having been sanctioned only by September 2012.
However, Rs 5 crore out of the remaining grant, and a Rs 4.5 crore capital grant from the Andhra Pradesh government were now available to the college, he noted.
Dhanda: RestructuringRestructuring strengths
The post of dean academic affairs – held by Prof Amita Dhanda since it was created in 2011 – became a source of controversy during Veer Singh’s last three months at Nalsar as potentially rivalling the VC’s administrative power. In December 2011 Dhanda filed a sexual harassment complaint against Singh, alleging that he had made sexist remarks in relation to her holding the academic affairs dean position.
The seat was abolished in May 2012 by Nalsar’s chancellor and executive council, one month after Mustafa had assumed charge of the university. “That post was wrongly created,” he said.
Dhanda has now been appointed as convenor of the committee on academics and examinations.
Dhanda said that it was a far more “expansive role” than dean academic affairs had been. “We have the committee system at Nalsar, in which there are several committees [for looking into different things]. The VC is the head of all committees. In this particular committee there are eight of us. I am the convenor,” she explained.
She told Legally India that in the “10 odd months” since its creation, the committee had done a fair amount of “experimentation” related in particular to restructuring of the curriculum.
As a consequence, Nalsar retained only two Bar Council of India (BCI)-mandated courses for the fourth and fifth year students – intellectual property law and law and poverty, which are “Nalsar’s strengths” as Dhanda put it. All other subjects for the last two years of the undergraduate degree were electives. “There has been lots of liberalisation,” she said.
While only core faculty would teach the mandatory courses, Nalsar would bring in a combination of domestic and foreign-trained visiting faculty for the electives, said Dhanda.
The committee was also experimenting to improve the projects and internship system at Nalsar.
“Prof Dhanda is running this university,” commented Mustafa. “While I am the de jure head of this law school, she is the de facto head.”
Click to show 29 comments at your own risk (alt+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
Prof Mustafa has shown a textbook example of "Command Failure". The "de facto" head and her "liberalised" policies in collusion with the worst possible Academic Convenor have forced the students in utter confusion. Days of NALSAR glories are over.
P.S.: Just in case if you are reading this [...] please include some questions on How the motivation level of students have gone down since you took over and what do the students suggest to overcome it in your end semester survey. Any efforts to have an open house anytime soon will be appreciated too.
Prof Mustafa has shown a textbook example of "Command Failure". The "de facto" head and her "liberalised" policies in collusion with the worst possible Academic Convenor have forced the students in utter confusion. Days of NALSAR glories are over.
P.S.: Just in case if you are reading this [...] please include some questions on How the motivation level of students have gone down since you took over and what do the students suggest to overcome it in your end semester survey. Any efforts to have an open house anytime soon will be appreciated too.
Ah, you must be one of the plagiarism happy students whose motivation level was higher during the tenure of Veer Singh! Had you been nay brighter you would have seen through the smokescreen created by Mustafa by labeling Prof. Dhanda as the 'def facto' head (all in the same week when he went ahead and posted VK as the registrar!)
Report of 3 sitting High Court Judges overruled by a lawyer! Quite interesting.
It seems the version of administrative law Dhanda preaches isn’t the one she practices (As de-facto head, mind you)
How is that Dhanda's fault? Do not take 'de facto' head title laid on her seriously, it is just another of Faizan's tactic to shift any blame away from himself.
Even if that is the case, Prof Dhanda as the Acad. Committee & Exam Committee Convenor and more imp. as the biggest preacher of 'accountability & fairness' ows this much to her students, that she could have objected when such arbitrary actions were being taken.
I mean making a [...] person the Registrar because he costs less !! when there are better options [...] available?
D did not object. She congratulated him when he got the post. There was ample time to object but she also wants to portray that she is running the system. She actually has no power. She is being played and she knows it.
Also, if you are alleging that Veer Singh or Ranbir Singh were corrupt etc, why did Dhanda never raise her voice at Ranbir Singh? Where was all the accountability then> You must understand that everyone plays the political game to their advantage
the problem with Dhanda is that she doesn't listen to anyone else once she has made up her mind. She pretends to be student friendly but she is far from it. "MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY"
She doesn't like being questioned. And that is not what she preaches.
d tried to object initially but the cooled down. There is no evidence against Mr. kumar. He is perfect for the job and in his attempt to win back the student community he will definitely prove to be very student friendly.
anyway.. these feuds were a thing of the past. Lets see what the gangs of Nalsar do from here on. MuWAHAHA [...], in the back drop of VC's all seeing Eye. [...] Indeed
She has rolled back every promise she made to us. 1. "the timetable is FOR you, my dears, if you dont like it we'll change it"
A- When we asked for it to be changed she yelled at us [...]
2- "We are becoming more liberal" A- hAHA- it couldn't be funnier- she is asking for students to "HANG AROUND" in the academic block to do nothing, but still "hang around" because going back to our rooms is so bad.
3- She made seniors roll back all the online courses after 2 months of studying and now wants them to study NEW courses.
She just does what she thinks is right. There is no questioning this lady. And if you do, she will humiliate you to make you look stupid in front of your juniors and announce in their class that you are not hard working. Which self respecting, senior faculty member does that??
She has rolled back every promise she made to us. 1. "the timetable is FOR you, my dears, if you dont like it we'll change it"
A- When we asked for it to be changed she yelled at us [...]
2- "We are becoming more liberal" A- hAHA- it couldn't be funnier- she is asking for students to "HANG AROUND" in the academic block to do nothing, but still "hang around" because going back to our rooms is so bad.
3- She made seniors roll back all the online courses after 2 months of studying and now wants them to study NEW courses.
She just does what she thinks is right. There is no questioning this lady. And if you do, she will humiliate you to make you look stupid in front of your juniors and announce in their class that you are not hard working. Which self respecting, senior faculty member does that??
[...]All she cares is about her decisions, her policies and her systems. If there is any voice against her, she will use her authority as well as jurisprudential dialogues to suppress it right there. Sad state of affairs in NALSAR.
@LegallyIndia: There is nothing wrong in my statement which your team has moderated. People should get to know what actually happened in the sexual harassment row.
I said that when we made a representation to Dhanda, she told us that [...]
There is no false statement in this. It is not slander and I just want all people to know that she doesn't really believe in accountability, as she claims.
Dhanda is a nice lady. We all know it. But if everything was to be run as per the students convenience then the new Registrar would be someone from among the student body. She roams around in Maruti 800. It can't get simpler than this. Can it? What am I talking about?
Like+6Object-1NALSAR ONE THE RISE 8 years agointeresting
Seems things at Nalsar are finally looking up. Who is Ms Dhanda and what are her contributions in shaping the university and each of its students is known to all and its a good thing that Mr Mustafa respects that. If he truly wants Nalsar to do well he has to ensure that he gives some importance to those people who has been associated with the university almost since its conception.
India needs a more modern and liberalized system of legal education and after Mr MP Singh (former NUJS VC n probably one of its best for a long time to come), Mr Mustafa under the advice of the Ms Dhanda is doing just the same.
There were once talks of Ms Dhanda being the successor to Mr MP Singh. But sadly for NUJS that did not materialize.
NALSAR is number one and will retain this title for the next 5 years or so., of course there are some senior faculty members who are trying to ruin the University by colluding with press to bring negative publicity to NALSAR but their number is limited these extremely disgusted lot cannot bring down the glory of NALSAR which Prof. Faizan, Mustafa, Prof. Danda and Prof Vijender Kumar will protect. Students have realised this and we are all standing like a rock behind our beloved VC
I dont think looking at people's mode of transport is the best judge of their morals or ethics. Our new registrar used to drive an i10 until last week. That doesn't mean anything. Also, D get chauffeur driven in her 800. No one is denying that she is a 'nice' academician. We're just saying that she would go far ahead if she were to practice what she preaches. She is definitely a great teacher but not a good administrator.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
P.S.: Just in case if you are reading this [...] please include some questions on How the motivation level of students have gone down since you took over and what do the students suggest to overcome it in your end semester survey. Any efforts to have an open house anytime soon will be appreciated too.
Ah, you must be one of the plagiarism happy students whose motivation level was higher during the tenure of Veer Singh! Had you been nay brighter you would have seen through the smokescreen created by Mustafa by labeling Prof. Dhanda as the 'def facto' head (all in the same week when he went ahead and posted VK as the registrar!)
It seems the version of administrative law Dhanda preaches isn’t the one she practices (As de-facto head, mind you)
How is that Dhanda's fault? Do not take 'de facto' head title laid on her seriously, it is just another of Faizan's tactic to shift any blame away from himself.
Even if that is the case, Prof Dhanda as the Acad. Committee & Exam Committee Convenor and more imp. as the biggest preacher of 'accountability & fairness' ows this much to her students, that she could have objected when such arbitrary actions were being taken.
I mean making a [...] person the Registrar because he costs less !! when there are better options [...] available?
You must understand that everyone plays the political game to their advantage
She doesn't like being questioned. And that is not what she preaches.
[...], in the back drop of VC's all seeing Eye. [...] Indeed
She has rolled back every promise she made to us.
1. "the timetable is FOR you, my dears, if you dont like it we'll change it"
A- When we asked for it to be changed she yelled at us [...]
2- "We are becoming more liberal"
A- hAHA- it couldn't be funnier- she is asking for students to "HANG AROUND" in the academic block to do nothing, but still "hang around" because going back to our rooms is so bad.
3- She made seniors roll back all the online courses after 2 months of studying and now wants them to study NEW courses.
She just does what she thinks is right. There is no questioning this lady.
And if you do, she will humiliate you to make you look stupid in front of your juniors and announce in their class that you are not hard working. Which self respecting, senior faculty member does that??
Quoting ACCOUNTABILITY:
Sad state of affairs in NALSAR.
Hats-ouph !
I said that when we made a representation to Dhanda, she told us that [...]
There is no false statement in this. It is not slander and I just want all people to know that she doesn't really believe in accountability, as she claims.
Please publish it.
2. Uni paid 52K for air ticket so that someone can come from london to write brochure - it is in interest of institution
3. 50K paid to fix the date of clat - others also got paid, so no prob
4. 8K pm for extra work as proctor and dy reg - extra money for extra work no prob
5/7. occupying big flat w/o paying rent - plays the sympathy card (drags everyone parent, wife, child) and need for house, no prob
6. use of uni vehicle for personal use - did not sign any register so no proof that the vehicle has been misutilised, great!!!
8. someone is an one man army - no bar on how many comm u can be, no prob
9. many times in same comm. - no bar on number also in diff capacities (warden, proctor, reg etc.)
10. serious charge of paper leakage - no evidence
11. moot court CTing - no role of moot advisor,
12/13 abuse of position (leveraging admin position for acad reasons) - as the man has many duties, he would have many enemies, so no prob
India needs a more modern and liberalized system of legal education and after Mr MP Singh (former NUJS VC n probably one of its best for a long time to come), Mr Mustafa under the advice of the Ms Dhanda is doing just the same.
There were once talks of Ms Dhanda being the successor to Mr MP Singh. But sadly for NUJS that did not materialize.
No one is denying that she is a 'nice' academician. We're just saying that she would go far ahead if she were to practice what she preaches. She is definitely a great teacher but not a good administrator.
www.indianexpress.com/news/indian-law-societys-law-college-low-placement-lack-of-infrastructu.../1084290/
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first