Jindal starts £2.4m police 'academy' India with Cambridge

Jindal police academy
Jindal police academy
Jindal Global Law School (JGLS) and Cambridge University have jointly been chosen by the Government of India to provide mid-career training to Indian Police Service (IPS) officers.

The £2.4m (Rs 16.6 crore) training programme for the first batch of police officers commences operation from JGLS’ centre for penology, criminal justice and police studies headed by Professor Oishik Sircar.

JGLS founding dean Professor Raj Kumar told Legally India: “The program will essentially have two stage components: In the first stage, two weeks of the training will be held in Cambridge and the second stage component involves four weeks of training in India.”

He said that the Cambridge part of the training will engage UK based experts who will teach 420 Indian police executive over a period of three years.

“Cambridge University has a very established police executive program and this program essentially provides for the framework of training police officers around the world on a number of issues other than just investigation.”

Kumar (pictured left) noted that police would be trained in law enforcement and the criminal justice system to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the whole system.

Part of the £2.4m contract value of the training programme would be paid to JGLS, explained Kumar.

He said: “Professor Lawrence W Sherman, who is a professor at the University of Cambridge and heads this police executive program, identified us their partners when he was visiting India a few years back.

Together we applied to the Ministry of Home Affairs under GOI [Government of India] for seeking this opportunity to train the police officers, which is a huge, elaborate process. We made our application almost two years back.”

Kumar said that he felt that winning the contract was an important achievement for the research centre of his law school.

“Certain things we believe universities ought to do: one is teaching, second is research and the third important aspect is capacity building, which means working very closely with Governmental, inter-governmental organisations, non-governmental organisation as well as other institutions of learning including the world’s top most institution like Cambridge to improve the quality and functioning of our existing institutions through shared knowledge and experience.”

Cambridge University Professor Lawrence Sherman said: “Our joint work with the Indian Police Service is a major step forward in the history of criminology, integrating knowledge and practice on a broad scale at the highest levels of the police institution.

“Yet it is only one of many steps we hope to take together. The Cambridge-Jindal partnership will help to build a major research centre in India , where questions of crime prevention can be studied with as much rigour as questions of epidemiology and disease prevention.”

The parties signed the agreement to enter into the training contract at Sardar Vallabhai Patel National Police Academy in Hyderabad on 11 March 2010.

Comments

Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 15:15
+0 -0
Awesome!
jindal is truly a world class law school..........
Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 16:53
+0 -0
Why JGLS gets this coverage? NALSAR has been training income tax officers for years now - which is way more prestigious than training the police. I think NLS also has some courses for government officials.
Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 17:26
+0 -0
So does NUJS.. If I am not mistaken, NUJS also has courses for police officers, public prosecutors, etc..

most big national law schools have these initiatives.. its not such a novel initiative after all.
Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 19:33
+0 -0
this big contract got only because the founders of the law are close to ruling party especially check the status of the chancellor naveen jindal
Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 20:14
+0 -0
NLU Jodhpur has also been training various govt. / judicial officers.

And one wonders whether such a huge payment to JGLS makes sense. While I am sure the training will be of good quality, the limited point is that it would be more cost effective to appoint one of the national law universities. Considering this is taxpayers' money, the procurement must be rational.
Anonymous guest 17 Mar 2010, 23:48
+0 -0
@5 , when you are saying that quality will be good, then dont you think its justified to charge huge amount of money .... now please dont tell me that because you people are from NLUs , its only you who can provide the best quality at reasonable cost. Just wait and watch how they are providing the training and how different it is from NLUs.
Anonymous guest 18 Mar 2010, 02:05
+1 -0
I really don't understand why all from NULs always criticize each and every think abt the Jindal global Law school?
Its really an achievement for JGLS to got such an opportunity even before its full one year Establishment!
Anonymous guest 18 Mar 2010, 16:26
+1 -0
Although I m not from JGLS, but still I shall say that the NLUs should shut their mouth ... sensible people never criticise before witnessing the results or performance of a performer.
Anonymous guest 18 Mar 2010, 17:19
+1 -0
Again. National Law School graduates criticizing JGLS. Insecurity abound. Look, you guys are the cream of the lot. We get it. But it does not behoove graduates of what is deemed as an 'elite' institution to behave in such manner.

And the reason why this made news and not NALSAR and NLU training others is because news is reported as it happens and not half a decade after it occurs. NALSAR and other institutes have been training public servants much before legallyindia came into the picture. Also, legallyindia is doing a favour to the very soothsayers who, in earlier posts, demanded to know what JGLS has done to even garner a review.

Well now you have your wish. So stop yer bitching.
Anonymous guest 18 Mar 2010, 22:31
+0 -0
The debate is just not abt hw gud the national universities are better than JGLS. However one question which strikes my mind is why are private players given huge projects like these when we alrady have institutes of excellence already operating, which would definitely no crave for profits from the govt's money. The lack of beleif in these institutions by the govt itslf which has established them is some point of ignominy. Jindal's lobby within the govt is strong, and neither do i see apoint that only jindal can train the officers with the help of cambridge and others cant! Jindals fee structure is res ipsa loquitur for its elitist predelictions. If we shud not oppose private participants, lets not also do them unde favours. If sm corp gaint gives a research project to jindal, its fine but govt projects need a bit of retrospection.
Anonymous guest 18 Mar 2010, 23:58
+0 -0
@ #10, this the era of PPP, so what is the harm if private institutions are given projects and assignments ? Plus I dont think the people in the Cambridge Univ are insensible in identifying JGLS as their partners.

With regards to your comment on JGLS's high fee structure I remember way back in 2005, the NLUs used to charge no less than Rs. 1,000/- for application form for entrance exam .... I have even seen sons of chaiwallas and bus drivers could not afford to even sit for those exams, leave alone spending Rs. 5 lacs for the course. So, please dont talk about the fee structure.

Somebody's father can afford to send him to UK , somebody to JGLS , somebody to Amity/ ICFAI/ Symbiosis, somebody to NLUs and somebody's father cant even buy form for his kid . So it all depends on how fat your dad's pocket is.

One more thing Zia Mody was educated in Cambridge and Harvard .... she is today one of the finest corp lawyers in India, but please don't forget everybody's dad cant afford to spend on his child's education like Soli Sorabjee did .... so dont talk about elitist and high fee structure and all . It really doesnt matter how she managed to study in UK and US.

If Jindal can influence govt. and impress Cambridge then its his talent and he deserves it. Today even the govt. understands the benefit of PPP or any sort of alliance with the private institutions.
Anonymous guest 19 Mar 2010, 01:59
+0 -0
those not from any of the NLUs can vent their frustation. but it is a fact that none of the NlUs is being run for generating a profit simpliciter. Jindal getting the contact for IPS officers can only be due to its parentage, the willingness to allow Cambridge to walk away with the moolah, the wish of the ips officers to visit firang shores [...] at taxpayers cost.
Anonymous guest 20 Mar 2010, 20:49
+0 -0
Indian law college rankings in 2025:

1) Harvard India campus
2) Oxford India campus
3) Yale India campus
4) Columbia India campus
5) Cambridge India campus
6) Stanford India campus
7) Berkeley India campus
8) Pennsylvania India campus
9) JGLS...in tie up with a foreign univ
10) NLS/NUJS/NALSAR etc.... the only one who will recruit for your colleges will be the likes of Chopra & Khanna & Kalra LLP Third Class Trial Court Advocates, New Delhi
Anonymous guest 21 Mar 2010, 08:17
+0 -0
Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley, Penn.
Yale will never come to India
Anonymous guest 21 Mar 2010, 16:40
+0 -0
No. 750 to 9. That is going to be one impressive jump.
Anonymous guest 22 Mar 2010, 16:48
+0 -0
@ 6, 7, 8, 9 & 11
Trust me guys, the NLUs aren't really concerned about JGLS. The comments were from the viewpoint "whether spending SO MUCH OF taxpayers' money to train govt. officers is justified". #11 spoke of PPP and public procurement. But then, there is always a bidding in huge public procurement to ensure that the govt. doesn't get a raw deal from the pvt. sector. Guys, the simple point is, JGLS would become a great lawschool maybe, with all the foreign tie-ups and foreign profs. But will they be adding so much value to domestic law training so as to charge such high fees? Wouldn't it be wiser for the govt. to approach universities that have proven standards and save public money? Or is it all nice to meet the JGLS chairman at some party and strike a deal that doesn't make sense in terms of economics, esp. coz its public money being spent.
Anonymous guest 22 Mar 2010, 16:56
+0 -0
HA HA HA HA HA.

Even if the picture you paint becomes a reality, what won't change is that the law college you attend / have attended would remain a third rate thing producing so-called-lawyers who are so frustrated with the NLU placements that they post such blogs :D So, are you with some third rate trial court advocate or what? Seems your college is where NLUs will be in 2025 :P My, when NLUs take over trial courts in 2025 (coz Harvard Yale is at big law firms), what will be left for u? Not even the lower courts.
Anonymous guest 23 Mar 2010, 16:43
+0 -0
C'mon reply to # 17 dude.
Anonymous guest 23 Mar 2010, 16:44
+0 -0
@ # 16 See its all about providing quality training ... it may also be that JGLS will be providing better quality training then what the NLUs have provided for years .... so if JGLS can surpass the NLU standard then I think such huge spending is justified ... after all better quality will definitely demand more money !!
Anonymous guest 23 Mar 2010, 23:04
+0 -0
@ # 14 , Yale already provides nursing training and health care studies in India , dude !!
Anonymous guest 23 Mar 2010, 23:40
+0 -0
well no. 17 , by that time i would, god willing , already be an equity partner. after the NLUs came up, most of indian firm s haven't been enthu about recruiting from oxford or harvard, and one has not yet counted the step children who would be set up, if so happens. why are the mn firms recruiting from nlus when so many from harvard and yale, including the desi's are sitting in their midst
Anonymous guest 24 Mar 2010, 00:47
+0 -0
I agree completely with you.

However, another thing to note is that JGLS' strength lies in foreign qualified faculty who may not add much value for domestic law training. Also, when so much public money is spent, the question that arises is "was the project bid out" or "was fair analysis done" before spending taxpayers' money when it may have been available cheaper. I guess the NLUs could have provided the service at cheaper rates (as they have been doing over the years). If JGLS is offering better stuff, is it really that much better? These are of course in-the-air questions! But good for the debate. After all, its a 16 cr. question :D

#16
Anonymous guest 24 Mar 2010, 00:51
+0 -0
Huh, your post does not seem to relate to my post !! I was responding to #13's projection that Harvard Yale would be top recruiting grounds and NLUs would be in deep shit in 2025. I was ridiculing #13. I am from a national law school myself and I agree with your take on firms being very enthu about the NLUs (foreign firms included).

#17
Anonymous guest 24 Mar 2010, 05:41
+1 -0
By the way as an outside observed not even from a law school, I am amazed how the National Law Schools are feeling insecure about the JGLS. Strangely, this is far too familiar for us as many of my colleagues were sharing similar feelings when ISB was created. The vision, philosophy, concept, global orientation of JGLS is fantastically similar to ISB in Hyderabad. Just that JGLS seems to be far more cheaper and accessible to students with very generous scholarships and fellowships to students. I guess that is the beauty of corporate philanthropy and Naveen Jindal's visionary leadership. I am truly amazed about everything JGLS has done and equally annoyed by the immature and irresponsible comments that this blog is receiving on these larger issues relating to legal education and higher education. This is also the problem relating to lack of sound intellectual public discourse in our country. Fairness and moderation in intellectual exchanges and adherence to truth is totally lost. People don't even care to know how rigorous a process this kind of bidding is for award of such training contracts. I know this because ISB Hyderabad has also secured another part of the contract. First of all it will be the foreign partner who chooses the Indian partner and it is truly remarkable that Cambridge University had chosen JGLS over all other National Law Schools. And the award of such a prestigious contract to Cambridge University is rightfully done by the Government of India for upgrading the law enforcement mechanism including policing. All these are serious issues, but the debate that is taking place in this blog is truly mediocre. The strength of JGLS is the quality of its faculty and the amazing number of scholarships and fellowships that they have offered. I am watching with a lot of expectation how the new Jindal Global Business School will evolve as a new entrant. I wish that the supporters of National Law Schools in India be a little more fair and reasonable when it comes to airing out their views of JGLS. This is much needed for India and does not in any way undermined the contribution of other great law schools in India.
Another remarkable initiative of JGLS is to have all the key people who have been the vanguard of legal education in India to be actively involved in the institution. I know that Professor Madhava Menon who is the father of modern legal education in India sits as a Member of the Academic Council of O.P. Jindal Global University.
I am very pleased to see the Business School of this University is promoting multidisciplinary learning. They have challenged every typical view of a private University in India. The problem is most people don't take the effort to rigorously examine the institutional profile before airing out unwarranted critical comments. I know them well as I have discussed with the founding members of ISB in Hyderabad.
Another interesting factor to note is that the O.P. Jindal Global University will be the first of its kind in India is unlike most top business schools in India (IIMs and ISB) which are alone stand alone Business School and unlike most top law schools in India (NLSs), this University has both a law school and a business school which gives great opportunities for students to have a multidisciplinary learning experience.
With the potential entry of foreign Universities in India, the Jindal initiative is a revolutionary initiative like that of ISB. But what makes Jindal even more transformative is the fact that it is a statutorily created legal entity as a University under the Indian law. This makes it even more an ambitious and exciting venture.
Anonymous guest 24 Mar 2010, 21:39
+0 -0
If Madhav Menon sir is in the board then there cant be an aiota of doubt that JGLS will be a success .... neither I m from NLS nor JGLS but from a private law school .... so without prejudice I shall say that JGLS will surely surpass many of the NLUs, if not NLS/NALSAR ...

I m pretty sure that JGLS will also create neo-age politicians in our country. Presently, there is a dearth of young politicians in our nation. Politicians like Obama, Hilary Clinton, Bush, etc. are all from top law schools of the US .... Well, till date we didnt witness any politician from NLS ( the premier law school of the nation) but who knows JGLS may create outstanding young politicians like Rahul Gandhi and Sachin Pilot , because of their global exposure. After all law school is just not about bagging a 12 lakh placement from Amarchand. This is what Jindal has identified very well.

15-20 years from now you may find JGLS grads framing policies on various issues where SILF members (the big fat managing partners) will avail prior appointments and meet them to discuss their interest getting affected and request them to make laws which supports them (just like SILF partners met Pranab Mukherjee to request him not to charge service tax and also not to allow entry of foreign law firms) .

So the difference between JGLS and NLS will be the former will understand its importance while the latter will identify its talent. And the difference lies just because of the global exposure ( with talent) which is more useful than becoming national and sell your talent.
Sorry 30 May 2011, 08:01
+0 -0
Outstanding politicians? Rahul and Sachin? What is their outstanding achievement apart from being a well established family in politics? Dude apart from NLS all the other NLU's were established quite late, So according to you JGLS will save the nation by producing NEO- AGE politician?
Anonymous guest 4 May 2010, 21:00
+0 -0
Let Jindal prove itself.
Anonymous guest 15 Jun 2010, 06:46
+0 -0
#26: I agree. Too much being said too early.
As for the National Schools' claim about having similar programs, besides the points about the foreign University choosing its partner, and such reports coming out over others due to Legally India's recent inception, as well as quality, one of the simple reasons why Legally India has chosen to report this program over other existing ones, is due to the sheer magnitude of the project. If the NLS/NUJS etc. programs can match up to this magnitude, then I concede that those programs should be equally well-publicised by the respective organizers as well as the correspondents of this very journal.
Dubby 24 Jun 2010, 14:18
+1 -0
I have been following many of the posts on Legally India - not only here but elsewhere. Most of the posters seem to be students or alumni of the National Law Schools. Merely because thay are the creme de la creme, having excelled in the CLAT should not give thm the impression that they can coast on their laurels. Nor for that matter should the schools take it easy because they have the brightest students.

Private schools are at a huge disadvantage vis a vis the NLS as they have to create centres of excellence out of their own funds and are unable to pick the deep pockets of the government. The day the government starts charging market rates for education in state run schools, will be the day the NLS will have to prove whether they can attract the best talent on the basis of their faculty and programmes.

JGU has provided a great many scholarships to ease the financial burden on the less economically favoured, but they can never bring their fee structure down to that of the govt funded NLS. If more of our super rich would endow such colleges from genuine philanthropic motives rather than pseudo philanthropy (as most are) we would see a sea change.
Anonymous guest 15 Jul 2010, 03:12
+0 -0
1. It is good that 420 mid career IPS officers will get a high profile training for 16. crs. Who will be these 420 officers and how will they utilize this opportunity to improve their policing efficiency - is there any focused plan or approach prepared by MHA or NPA ?
2. Who has identified the need for this training - state police ? NPA? MHA? or Jindal Law School ? The news item says, it is Cambridge and Jindal together applied to GoI. How this combo has identified this specific need? For improving policing efficiency all of a sudden? oh, of course for their business spread. At whose cost? It is one of those hundreds of thousands of public money planned squandering. Is it not? why bother?
3. Certainly such high profile training will provide some learning experience to some. Who will acquire this experience and how will this be used further? Would it not have been a wise thing for MHA to have got Cambridge and National Police Academy aligned together for this. The 16 crs could have helped NPA in setting up a center for focused continuing education where it could have brought all the world class policing knowledge and experience into one fold and forever it might help police training in India.

Dear legal fraternity, if you ask these questions, somewhere down the line India's public spending might improve and focused for right purposes and right results.

Inferno 30 May 2011, 02:16
+1 -0
Ohk people we all agree that doesnt test how good a lawyer you are but is a basic test of aptitude......all that do well in CLAT get a good univ. and those who dont either drop or go for a private univ., so, why all this fightin no one is inferior to anyone in this world and a grad. of symbi/jgls can do better in life than NLS, and thats true the other way round so as we do not have any insight into our future selves it would be wrong to undermine any individual univ or person.....
Inferno 30 May 2011, 02:19
+0 -0
agree that *CLAT