GNLU Gandhinagar transferred the power to punish students allegedly found guilty of prohibited activities and conduct during exams from its executive council to its director.
In November 2015 a student was accused of cheating during an exam, which the student disputed, winning a Gujarat high court order that heavily criticised the oligarchy created at GNLU under director Bimal Patel.
But in a resolution ratified on 27 February 2016, the university amended the Gujarat National Law University (Academic, Mooting, Internship, Examinations, Hostel and Other Matters) Regulations, 2015.
The series of amendments were only uploaded to the GNLU website some time later (available at http://www.gnlu.ac.in/aad/GNLU%20Regulations-Amendment%202015-1.pdf ) - an internet archive snapshot of the page of 30 March 2016 does not contain a link to the file, and according to a so-called http “response header” returned by the PDF file, it was “last modified” on 12 May 2016, suggesting that it may have been uploaded around that time.
According to the amendment to regulation 44 (disciplinary measures for prohibited activities and conduct during examinations), where the executive council (EC) had the power to impose “any other [disciplinary] measures [than those listed in the regulation]” on an allegedly guilty student, it is now the director alone who enjoys the EC’s former power.
The amendment to regulation 44(f) states:
Existing as, ‘Notwithstanding the above measures, the Executive Council on the report of the Examination Committee may consider imposition of any other measures as it may deem appropriate.’
Amended as, “Notwithstanding the above measures, the Director on the report of the Examination Committee may consider imposition of any other measures as it may deem appropriate. [emphasis added]
The rules amend regulation 44 dealing with disciplinary measures during examinations, namely:
The Gujarat high court is currently hearing GNLU’s letters patent appeal against its single-judge order that had noted that Patel and other staff members had turned GNLU:
into an oligarchy where all decisions are taken, reviewed and implemented by a select few, and students are casually denied basic human rights and natural justice
After that order GNLU had, during court vacations, filed for an urgent hearing to grant an interim stay on it so that the law school could conduct its internal inquiry into the student’s case of alleged cheating. The high court had dismissed GNLU’s application for urgent hearing on the ground that it was not confident of the fairness of such an inquiry within the university’s “four corners”.
Vacations at the high court are now over and the court heard arguments in the appeal yesterday.
The case is now listed for hearing tomorrow.
Update 9 June 2016, 15:29: Judgment expected to be out on Friday (10 June)
Patel did not respond to an email we sent him this morning.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
You should follow me. twitter.com/lawschoolleaks
filled?
www.business-standard.com/article/companies/microsoft-establishes-ipr-chair-at-gujarat-national-law-university-114022600486_1.html
spicyip.com/2015/01/gnlu-gujcost-ipr-centre-for-excellence-launched.html
This is a case of a power hungry dinosaur wrecking havoc in the most arbitrary fashion. Hoping the Division Bench will not only uphold the observations of the Single Judge, but also add its own views on the illegal (not improper, but illegal) and unjust "gun rule" situation at GNLU.
www.thestatesman.com/news/india/india-should-pay-attention-on-research-president/147264.html
By amending the rules (PURPORTEDLY) during pendency of the writ petition before the single judge, not informing the student community about this amendment, and only bringing it in the knowledge of the court during appellate arguments...GNLU has itself proved that the bias that Jaymin talked of is a very real and tangible thing. Very evidently, the amendment to the rules is back-dated.
In fact, all the students who have faced similar summary adjudications must challenge the university's decisions in courts of law.
This fight cannot be won by one student who risked going to court against the entire administration at the cost of his education. For any substantial result, the fight has to be a concerted effort by everyone who has been denied what was due.
Sadly, GNLU, despite what it would like us to believe, has been doing this ever since Bimal Patel took charge, and it is hardly surprising to see this happening.
It is rather confounding how the man seems to get away with things time and again. The last time students approached the Gujarat HC, he got away on appeal after a stinging order by the single judge. The very fact that he chose to appeal in itself clearly tells one that this man has absolutely no regard for the interests of the students in the institution which he is supposed to lead into the future.
In fact, from what I hear, there is much more going on behind the curtain that even this, and I am sure, if things gain traction, hopefully after Friday's order, these things will also come to light, as somewhere below all this there is yet more confusion that this man is yet to perpetrate.
History shows how tyrants are made, and it was visible that Bimal Patel displayed dictatorial tendencies right from the beginning. It is only natural that now, many years later, his power has only grown with the entry of each new batch who are taught fear of the administration from the very get go. There are enough articles on this very website that can help trace the transformation of this man from a relatively harmless bigot into an absolute tyrant.
Well, as Lord Acton said, "Absolute power....". You know how it goes.
The Gujarat HC has a glorious opportunity to rein in the GNLU administration, and it is about damn time that happened.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first