who advised on the forum. should have moved the high court

The list, which is now finally out, is an indication that the real scam is perhaps the leakage of paper. First of all so many have simultaneously broken the previous records. In the normal course we would see a significant gap between the first position and the second. Last year when the topper got much lower marks, the difference was of 10 and now it is barely half a marks. The degree of convergence which we see in the first 10 marks is phenomenal and unprecedented. Further we observe that among the first 12 candidates 5 have MP as their domicile, an unprecedented 40% for a state not known for its educational attainments and success in competitive exams. The frequency with which we observe the MP domiciles in the top end does not end at rank 12 but goes on giving the impression that at around 20% of the top 100 are from MP. Once in a while we observe Bihar, AP, Punjab and UP domiciles, with three of the four being more well known for their performance in competitive exams. The test is to see how many of those who scored 150 or above marked for the four questions whose answers were wrongly given in the first instance by GNLU and the question which had two correct answers. Of the 4 whose answers was not known to the paper setter, they should get the correct answer in at least 3 cases and wrong in one, by the law of probability. If they mark the same wrong answers as GNLU marked originally when it gave the model answers, then we ought to suspect as the correct answers will be uniform but there is lack of uniformity in wrong responses. Further, in the question which had two correct responses, what is the proportion of those who gave the same response as put out by GNLU. If there are two correct responses then ideally those who got it correct should be evenly distributed between the two.