Visakha Law College, Visakhapatnam and Veeravali College of Law, Prakash Nagar, Rajamundry both filed writ petition on 17 September 2010 against the BCI, seeking a writ of mandamus to allow them to be part of the AP law school entrance examination LAWCET.
Both law colleges were denied accreditation to admit students at the 4 September 2010 BCI meeting, which was part of three meetings at which the BCI derecognised more than 50 law schools.
That list and the meeting’s minutes were only made public on 21 September 2010, as reported by Legally India this week, and were not communicated to the law colleges at the time the writs were filed.
However, it is understood that the state’s admissions exam convenor LAWCET was notified by the BCI of colleges that were derecognised on 16 September, one day before the writ petitions were filed by the colleges.
A representative from Veeravali law college confirmed to Legally India that the petition had been filed and that the college would also seek to challenge the BCI’s withdrawal of accreditation. The BCI declined to comment.
The writ petitions are due for their first hearing on 27 September and are listed by the AP High Court website as:
- WP 23140/ 2010 All Saints Christian Educational Society & Ano vs Secy Bar Council of India, New Delhi & Ano
- WP 23138/ 2010 St. Stephen Educational Society & Another, Visakhapatnam vs Bar Council of India & Anr, Delhi
The BCI minutes of September had recorded the following in respect of the two colleges:
Visakha Law College, Visakhapatnam
Having regard to the fact that the Legal Education Committee is not likely to meet again in the near future and since orders will have to be passed in respect of the colleges where inspection have been carried out we allowed the office to mention in respect of the Visakha Law College, Visakhapatnam. Having perused the report of the inspection committee, we have taken into account all the facts, circumstances and the records we are satisfied that the institution neither deserves an accreditation for a 3 year nor a 5 year course. Issue notice to show cause as to why it should not be closed and why recognition should not be withdrawn? Injunction to be issued against further admissions. In respect of the previous batches, issue notice to the Vice Chancellor, Andhra University to show cause how the students of the earlier batches can be accommodated in neighbouring institutions. Notwithstanding the fact that the college has not even deposited the guarantee money, yet, we have not taken into account the non deposit of guarantee money for arriving at our conclusion.
Veeravali College of Law, Prakash Nagar, Rajamundry
Mention made by office on Veeravali College of Law, Prakash Nagar, Rajamundry. Having perused the report we have taken note of the fact that the same is a minority institution like Visakha Law College. However, having regard to the total lack of qualification of regular faculty and they being totally under-paid there is no possibility of the institution being able to impart high quality of legal education either in the 3 year course or the 5 year course. Permission to run 3 year course and 5 year course rejected. Injunction is issued against admission for the years 2010-2011. Vice Chancellor, Andhra University to show cause how the students of the earlier batches can be adjusted.
Photo by renaissancechambara
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
Excuse me, you might want to elaborate on that statement. I don't know about Bhopal, but the "products" of NLU Jodhpur are in no way inferior to those of any other law school in India. You have clearly not interacted with the students in these law schools before making such statements. Or should I take it that your are trying to suggest that ALL law schools in India are producing one-dimensional zombies? In that case, that's pretty much the same tale everywhere, including our coveted IITs and IIMs.
I also wish to state for the record, that I interact with law graduates from all sorts of colleges in the country and what I write is from my experience - close to ten years now.
In my personal role as a stakeholder in the legal education system for the last few years and my personal work with some of the topmost global education majors I have no hesitation in saying that whatever is happening in the name of current BCI "reforms" is nothing but cronyism of the worst kind at top echelons of the legal education regulator - this is worse because the current dispensation is portrayed as divnity and then they are respporting to such tactics (the closest parallel I have is of CWG mess and Suresh Kalmadi, by the time the media and everybody else realize the long term damage, it will be too late). Beyond this I cant say much in this blog.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first