Luthra & Fox lawyer litigation start-up Pamasis grows to three equal partners

Pamasis Law, the former Luthra & Luthra and Fox Mandal associates’ litigation firm started up in August of last year, has grown to three partners and two associates in a first formal office space.

Legally India had reported last year that an NLU Jodhpur 2008 graduate Sameer Jain had quit his associate position at Luthra & Luthra to start-up the litigation and tax advisory practice Pamasis, with his brother Sidhharth Jain who had formerly worked with Fox Mandal.

The two were working from their Noida home at the time, as Sidhharth also continued assisting a Noida-based senior lawyer.

In January of this year Delhi-based advocate Sandeep Bajaj, who had been working with the Jains on a case by case basis since the inception of Pamasis, merged his civil and corporate litigation practice with the start-up bringing with him one fresher-level associate.

Sameer told Legally India that profits at the firm would be equally distributed between Bajaj, Sidhharth and himself.

Bajaj graduated from Punjab University Chandigarh in 2007, assisted Delhi advocate Atul Nanda until 2009 and thereafter senior advocate Amarjit Singh Chandhiok until January 2012 when he started out on his own.

Another associate-level retainer also joined Pamasis in December and the firm took a new office in Jangpura Extension in South Delhi.

“Lots of work has come in since December, primarily litigation and government advisory [including] customs, [intellectual property], and land acquisition matters. We have lots of civil suits primarily at the [Delhi] high court and Supreme Court level, and we’re handling writ petitions,” said Sameer adding, “We haven’t had the time to go out and market ourselves since referrals are churning so much work.”

Sameer said that now while he will take charge of the tax advisory work at the firm, Sidhharth would look after litigation on the original side including civil suits, and writs, appeals and special leave petitions will be the forte of Bajaj.

Comments

P* 13 Mar 2013, 11:41
+5 -4
The headline is misleading, suggests an official link with Luthra & Fox.
kianganz 13 Mar 2013, 11:44
+5 -2
There is an official link - they used to work at Luthra & Fox, no...?
anon 13 Mar 2013, 12:17
+4 -5
Very very misleading. Besides being grammatically incorrect, it sounds like Luthra & Fox have together started or spun off a new litigation firm. At least write ex Luthra & Fox.
kianganz 13 Mar 2013, 12:32
+4 -3
Headlines are usually condensed and stylised. And is it likely in any way whatsoever for any reasonable reader to understand that "Luthra & Fox" have together started a litigation firm?

Anyway, have added 'lawyer' after Luthra & Fox in this case so no one gets the wrong idea...
Anony 14 Mar 2013, 05:34
+1 -1
[quote name="kianganz"]Headlines are usually condensed and stylised. And is it likely in any way whatsoever for any reasonable reader to understand that "Luthra & Fox" have together started a litigation firm?

Anyway, have added 'lawyer' after Luthra & Fox in this case so no one gets the wrong idea...[/quote]

Kian- I do not think that the title of this post does justice. It STILL gives the impression of some sort of LL-Fox offspring of sorts.. maybe if you were to add the prefix "EX" before the title head, it would be clear albeit at the cost of losing the "oomph" factor!!
kianganz 14 Mar 2013, 06:09
+1 -0
Thanks, but no, I really don't agree, on any reasonable (and even some unreasonable) readings...
Zing 13 Mar 2013, 12:37
+3 -5
Well, would you read it if not for the misleading headline? For LI, its all about getting more "hits" and a headline like this would do just that!
kianganz 13 Mar 2013, 12:44
+9 -0
Obviously putting names of older firms in a headline makes the story more interesting and relatable to a greater number of readers.

But we'd never intentionally publish any misleading headlines, nor would there be any benefit in it for us, apart from a one-off spike in traffic.

In this case, I'd be slightly worried if anyone actually clicked on the story seriously expecting a story about how Luthra & Luthra and Fox Mandal together started a litigation law firm, which has now expanded to three partners.
Foxy Roxy 13 Mar 2013, 13:26
+5 -1
I think its extremely misleading - there are no foxes or wolves in fox & mandal. The name itself is misleading !!
green lantern 13 Mar 2013, 14:47
+2 -3
the headline is grammatically correct and factually accurate. for the disbelievers, if fox merges into luthra at some point, then this headline with be prophetic.
- 13 Mar 2013, 15:50
+6 -0
The headline seems fine. People give kian a break. It is good to note that LI is covering startups. A welcome break from big law gossip and good for the startup.

Kudos to the three brave guys.
what is wrong with everyone 13 Mar 2013, 21:04
+4 -0
Guys! Please be a little reasonable. Instead of commending Kian and his teams' efforts to cover pan India stories, you guys are being hyper critical.

My good wishes to PAMASIS.
Hmm 14 Mar 2013, 23:44
+1 -0
But what's with the name Pamasis?
I know :P 18 Mar 2013, 09:12
+11 -0
Pa: Father
Ma: Mother
Sis: Sister

:P..how was that for a sad joke :P