Khaitan & Co takes on Clifford Chance SA: second dual-qualified banking partner

Khaitan&Co-Devidas-Banerji
Khaitan&Co-Devidas-Banerji
Khaitan & Co has hired its second full-time banking partner, with former Clifford Chance London and Singapore senior associate Devidas Banerji joining in Mumbai.

Banerji (pictured) had started his career at Clifford Chance in 2002, beginning as a trainee, qualifying as an associate in asset finance and moving to join the firm’s Singapore general banking and finance team in 2007.

He had graduated from Symbiosis Pune in 2001 after which he completed an LLM at the University of Cambridge in 2002. He is dual qualified as an advocate and solicitor in West Bengal and England & Wales respectively.

Banerji and Khaitan & Co were unavailable for comment but the firm wrote in a press release said that Banerji’s appointment reinforced the belief to provide “high quality and specialist services” to its clients in banking and finance. Partner Rabindra Jhujhnunwala wrote: “Within a short period of time we have created a formidable banking and finance practice out of the Mumbai office.”

In April the firm hired former White & Case senior associate Shishir Mehta to build up its specialist banking practice in Mumbai as a partner and only last week Legally India reported that Khaitan & Co had introduced a salaried-partnership rung with the hire of Rajat Mukherjee as an associate partner in Delhi from Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in New York.

The firm’s total partnership is now 43 partners, including one non-equity partner.

Please help improve the Legallypedia page of [[Khaitan & Co]].

Comments

Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 17:43
+0 -0
well done khaitan, way to go breaking new grounds !!
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 20:31
+0 -0
# 1, are you the original or copycat who says this on all Khaitan news ?
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 20:37
+0 -0
#1 -muh ki baat cheen lete ho hamesha/...meri salary kat jayegi yar..[...]
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 20:38
+0 -0
This firm really looks ambitious and is putting its act together....
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 20:41
+0 -0
How are you so late, Dexter ?
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 20:56
+0 -0
@2 I m not the original.. but it clicked me to be d 1st person to post dez comments.. I hope dey start paying me fr performing dis outstanding job...
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 21:15
+0 -0
Clearly shows a magic circle stint helps making partner in a family firm in India
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 21:28
+0 -0
#7 - we had discussion earler also and it was settled that khaitan is also a magic circle firm...correct your facts!
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 22:09
+0 -0
so only foreign returned champs will be partners in khaitan, cool ... better they make it official now.
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 22:09
+0 -0
hey #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 hi to all

bty can u all confirm me the news that AMSS, Khaitan and other firm have started the new division and are looking for new persons. Qualification needed - should be expert in buttering and praise the firm everywhere.

i can do all this even when i am in my bathroom or at the marriage of friends and drunk.
there seems to be guys on LI writing the comments and praising the firm as Anonymous guest. seems khaitan giving more bonus to these guys.

Disclaimer- i am the person who is not employed by any of the law firms nor rejected by these firms. i never applied to these firms nor i am aggrieved by them ;-) so no hard feelings.
but i am do looking for the Job in the firms if available ( post which i mentioned at the top ) i can b e reached through this space if LI does'nt mind. hey Kian plz dont delete or stop my offer coming through your channel. i would be highly obliged to you if i get the Job.
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 22:31
+0 -0
khaitan's hiring of magic circle lawyers once again shows the hypocrisy of SILF members. high time we allowed foreign law firms. can't manmohan appoint moily as ambassador to zimbabwe and GS as governor of andaman? that should take care of the problem.
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 00:38
+0 -0
oh no not another bong making the news !! first it was indrannel then rajat and now devidas ... how many more bongs are in the pipeline to return to india ?
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 02:10
+0 -0
How much would a non-equity "salaried" partner get in Khaitan?
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 17:05
+0 -0
@12: at least bongs are making it in the news for the right reasons and not in connection with any scams, unlike some communities i can think of.
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 18:20
+0 -0
@14; what about the biggest law firm scam recently done by another [...]? He ate millions belonging to his partners and associates!
Anonymous guest 24 Sept 2010, 19:34
+0 -0
hey why did u censor post #15? we would like to know the name of the person/firm. at least give us some hints such as:

1)which city is the firm based in?
2) is it a family firm?
3) is it a young firm?
4) does it have any "best friend" relationship with a foreign firm?

[The original post did not mention the name of the firm or person but was just using inappropriate language so we had to edit. -Ed]
Anonymous guest 27 Jan 2011, 02:38
+0 -0
Kian- Why dont you allow people to say what they want to say? This is a forum to express your thoughts then why censor the comments? I recall, once I had expressed what I thought of a person making partner (there was no name mentioned in my post- just a vague reference and there were certainly no bad words used)who didnt really deserve it and you didnt allow the post? Now why exactly would I not be allowed to express what I think about the decision of an xyz firm, if I have an opinion about someone working there, from prior knowledge of having interacted with them? I mean I fail to understand why you are policing this space so much?
kianganz 27 Jan 2011, 03:16
+0 -0
#17, thanks for your comment. I am not sure which comment you are referring to exactly but generally we try to be quite permissive in our policy.

Where we may normally moderate is where individuals are named. For one, most of the time if individuals are criticised it is very hard to establish whether something is valid or whether it is just a disgruntled former employee or a rival.

Many lawyers are also very thin skinned when it comes to personal criticism, no matter how justified, and we try to tread a fine line between freedom of expression and turning the forums into a massive mud-slinging match.

If you express things delicately and sensitively they will normally get through - on most average days I'd say we only moderate 1 comment out of 50 or 100 (apart from spam).

Hope this helps.

Best regards
Kian

Ps: There was also a but in the commenting system for the last 2 months which may have swallowed some comments. Will elaborate shortly...