Khaitan & Co ends all-equity partnership, bulks Delhi corp with Skaddens lateral

Khaitan-Co_Rajat-Mukherjee
Khaitan-Co_Rajat-Mukherjee
EXCLUSIVE: Khaitan & Co has hired Symbiosis graduate Rajat Mukherjee as an “associate partner”, which is the first time a non-equity salaried partner has joined the firm under the revamped partnership structure.

Mukherjee joins the Delhi office’s corporate team from Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in New York where he was an associate.

With his hire Khaitan & Co has made the unprecedented step of inducting a salaried or “associate partner” to the firm. Previously the firm had operated a pure equity partnership where every partner’s performance was assessed annually by a committee that determine each partner’s equity share, explained Mumbai co-founding partner Rabindra Jhunjhunwala.

He told Legally India that the change to a mixed salaried and equity model was a “systematic” one, with final details still being finalised. “It is sort of a transition period which we are going to have before we consider people for full equity.”

He added that the system would not stop senior lateral hires from joining the firm’s equity directly, although it was still being discussed on how to structure the system for internal promotions.

Mukherjee (pictured), who joined the firm on 1 July 2010, commented: “The idea [behind salaried partnership] was that the expectations should be understood from both sides when you join – the business development and getting clients is not something that happens immediately when you make partner.”

“This gives people who are just being elevated gives me some breathing room to not just execute but do client development and then you move to full equity,” he added.

Khaitan & Co partner Bharat Anand, who joined the Delhi office in February 2009, said that Mukherjee’s joining would add to the strength of the firm’s corporate practice in Delhi, which consisted of three partners at the moment. “I think it’s clearly to emulate what we’ve done in Bombay and build the firm as a full service firm in both centres.”

“Litigation has been the traditional strength of the firm along with tax but now I think essentially the firm is migrating towards corporate being at the forefront of the firm,” he explained. “We are building and ramping up on the M&A side and the corporate field.”

Khaitan & Co’s Delhi office now consists of 68 lawyers and 12 partners, of whom three now focus on corporate, four on litigation, two each in projects and tax and one each in real estate and competition law. The Mumbai office, which was founded in 2001, now consists of 120 lawyers, including 19 partners. Across all four offices the firm has more than 245 lawyers, including 41 equity partners and now one associate partner.

Mukherjee is a 2002 graduate of Symbiosis Law School in Pune after which he had worked for three-and-a-half years at DSK Legal in Mumbai, while it was briefly Andersen Legal’s Indian alliance partner. He completed an LLM from Columbia law school in New York in 2006 after which he joined Skaddens in New York, as well as Hong Kong for one year.

In 2009 Mukherjee went on secondment to Khaitan & Co’s Delhi office for three months and had decided to remain in India. He explained: “There’s so much happening in India that you can’t help but want to be part of it.

“The secondment was a good idea because for one my wife and I wanted to be in India because she was having a baby. And I’ve known [Mumbai co-founding partner] Haigreve [Khaitan] for a long time and had worked across Khaitan when I started my career.”

Please help improve the Legallypedia page of [[Khaitan & Co]].

Comments

Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 18:08
+1 -1
what the hell ...these indian firms abuse foreign law firms as imperialists but have no probs in taking their employees.
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 18:30
+1 -1
And what happens to people who are slogging in Delhi office for 10+ years ?
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 19:17
+1 -0
A not unexpected move, absorbing so many partners into the equity in last year must have taken its toll, particularly on internal promotions. For those who have been waiting taking salaried partner may be better than nothing.
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 19:39
+1 -1
If they were good enuf they would have been made a partner by now. Ask them to pull up their socks and get to work insteading of taking a dig at the decision of the firm.
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 19:46
+1 -1
Looks like partnerships in Khaitan are now restricted only to new recruits from UK/US. Is Khaitan promoting any of its senior associates (who have been like that for years, rather ages)- I guess time to look out !
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 19:47
+0 -0
well done Rajat...one of your friends from Mumbai days !!
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 19:54
+0 -0
# 5, I haven't seen any internal promotions in Khaitan Delhi for years now, unlike Mumbai office.
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 20:10
+0 -0
@2 its not the quantity of time you spend..its the quality of work you do...think about it..
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 20:26
+0 -0
This firm really looks ambitious and is putting its act together.
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 21:32
+0 -0
how much did dsk pay in 2002..
Anonymous guest 14 Sept 2010, 22:00
+0 -0
Way to go Rajat,
I am sure loosers from Uk/US wont make partners.
Its the quality achievers who make partners.
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 00:05
+0 -0
@ mr. mukherjee.... all the very best to you my good sir.............
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 00:18
+0 -0
@11: then why did rajat work abroad and do his LLM there? had he worked in india would he have got this promotion? typical SILF talk.
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 01:24
+0 -0
Feels great that all the bongs are coming back to india .... hopefully they will come back to kolkata one day when communism fades away in this part of the country.
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 17:08
+0 -0
# 15, God save India. We don't want bongs to do to India what they have done to Bengal for sure ...
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 19:45
+0 -0
@14: bangali log nahi sudhrega. next thing you will be asking for separate country like kashmir.

@15: well said. bongs will destroy india if they start running law firms and businesses. bongs ruin everything they touch. look at nujs!
A very sad Indian 27 Nov 2012, 07:47
+2 -0
Regional minded people like you will never let India stand as a nation that is proud to say we are INDIANS. You will keep fighting about regionalism, caste, religion et al despite receiving higher education and even legal training. I am depressed to see educated Indians behave this way which gives the world a good laugh at our expense. Honestly, you people talk like uneducated bigots. Our country suffers from regional hatred and its effects - riots based on religion, abuse and rapes based on caste, unhealthy attitude towards people from other states, and even day-to-day favouritism in every aspect of life.

My primary school education taught me something on a regular basis which I pray you would learn and pass on to others.

1. We are humans first and we must place good of mankind above anything else.

2. We are Indians and we must strive towards becoming a truly united nation which is independent from the regional psychology of the past that prevented us from gaining independence much before 1947.

3. We may believe in any form of God but disrespecting other religions go against 1 and any God you believe in.

4. Believing in any form of discrimination (colour, caste, sex, creed, religion) goes against 1.

5. 3 and 4 not only reflect poorly on your parents, teachers, community and most importantly on your nation but also on your standing as a human being. That is why only animals participate in riots and heinous crimes.

JAI HIND.

Kian and Legally India: You will do a lot of good if you publish this as your comment of the week or do a story on this. Maybe some people will feel ashamed and change themselves and try to educate others. I am counting on you to spread the word.
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 20:24
+0 -0
#15..you demented bong hater..Bongs did not do anything to Bengal..whatever happened to Bengal, happened because of a warped ideology called 'Marxism...', but anyway, why the hell is a law firm guy or chick making partner making news...wonder who would have known these fellows if platforms like LI wouldn't have bothered, who the hell is a law firm partner anyway?? Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Dhrubhai Ambani?? It's time legallyindia concentrates on research which people want to know - like how much do law firm partners in top Indian law firms earn? This would be breaking news in the legal industry, because nobody really knows the compensation structure of a top law firm partner in India...request LI team to undertake research on this aspect and enlighten us
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 20:28
+1 -0
i am fillig in for Dexter who is paid by khaitan to comment on every post: "well done Khaitan & Co, seem to be breaking new grounds."
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 20:58
+0 -0
#18, I absolutely agree with you. I see same comments on every Khaitan news, cut and paste language ....
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 21:00
+0 -0
#17, if this is no news, why you reading or taking time to put such comprehensive (?) comment on this. grow up.
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 21:35
+0 -0
Actually I don't remember a single story about any firm, promotion, deal on here where there isn't some generic well-wishing cut-and-paste comment. Some more creativity people please in your flattery!
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 21:42
+0 -0
Somehow i am really surprised at the left out lot (partnership wise), how can people keep working without any incentive or roadmap ahead ... [...]
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 21:42
+0 -0
#20...thanks old man, I know u are very grown up and mature and think only putting a comment mean I have taken great interest in the news..I am just trying to point out what would be better news...thanks, but I would not like to be an old man and read about appointment of law firm partners all the time...you go and rot
kianganz 15 Sept 2010, 21:48
+0 -0
Thanks for your feedback. However I am surprised in this case - I thought the most interesting part of this story was Khaitan's conversion to a mixed salaried/equity partnership model, as exists at many other firms.

Looking at the way different law firms choose to structure their equity is important, and will no doubt increasingly become so moving forward.

In terms of partnership salaries, well yes, we would all like to know. Unfortunately any information I currently have is not enough to be publishable as confirmed fact.

Best regards,
Kian
Anonymous guest 15 Sept 2010, 22:45
+0 -0
# 22 ... there is a left out lot in all the firms, Indian or international...some of them are not good enough to become partners and some do not want to take additional responsibilities that come with partnerships. The important point from any firm's perspective is clarity to people about their growth trajectory.
Anonymous guest 16 Sept 2010, 22:16
+0 -0
how is the wife and the baby doing??? friend from mumbai...
Anonymous guest 17 Sept 2010, 03:19
+0 -0
#18: hey rajeev, dexter here!!! how dare u try to take my place!!! dnt even think bout replacing me dude!! jaake manupatra pe kaam maango!!
Anonymous guest 17 Sept 2010, 17:32
+0 -0
@15 and 16: This post was about a talented youngster joining Khaitan as a salaried partner and the new mix of salaried and equity partnership in Khaitan. However, you two took this opportunity to malign Bengalis for some reason. Quite apart from the complete lack of nexus, your comments have a racist undertone and show you, your education (or the lack of it) and your community in poor light. Why malign a group of people who have played and continue to play such a stellar role in the Indian freedom struggle, social upliftment, literature, economics, sports, entertainment and culture? Sour grapes?
Anonymous guest 17 Sept 2010, 18:54
+0 -0
# 25, good explanation. However, I wonder if the firms actually have any trajectory for their people - it seems more of ad hoc decisions to hire new partners on the basis of their stint abroad (even if a couple of years [...]), seems that we have a new system of discrimination among Indian lawyers now - i.e., only those who have been abroad will become partners in few firms.
Anonymous guest 17 Sept 2010, 20:53
+0 -0
I see lot of anti Khaitan posts whenever there is news relating to it. Is it a bad law firm or do people in India feel that only Amarchand and AZB can be in the thick of things? I think Khaitan is doing reasonably well and more the number of good Indian law firms the better it is for both clients and legal professionals.
Anonymous guest 18 Sept 2010, 01:27
+0 -0
@ 30 - I agree to your view .... I think its the deal which actually makes the news rather than the law involved in it. For example a tier II law firm may work on SARFESI Act where its client is Vijaya Bank and at the same time some big law firm may deal with the same Act where its client is say Stanchart. So it doesnt matter which law firm or law point is involved in the deal, its actually the clients and the deals which should make the news. Because both the law firms do great work at their own level.
Anonymous guest 18 Sept 2010, 18:50
+0 -0
i agree with a comment up there...howcome the older senior associates working in kco for donkeys years arent getting their due???? whats with these new guys breezing in and picking up partnerships.....KCO should promote the older people who are the backbone of the organization actually...otherwise the glory will be shortlived....
Anonymous guest 18 Sept 2010, 20:15
+0 -0
# 32, the firm does not think the older lot is the backbone of the firm, they need new, nice, savvy foreign-english speaking people on the 'front desk'.
Anonymous guest 23 Sept 2010, 04:37
+0 -0
excellent...well done! congratulations
@ Kian and LI 27 Nov 2012, 06:30
+0 -0
Shouldn't you guys have censored the anti-Bengali (Bong) comments that are racist and reek of regional-hatred? Just so that you know, these type of comments go against the principles of national integration enshrined in the Constitution of India and could also be punishable under the Indian Penal Code because they hurt the sentiments of a class of people. Someone could file an FIR with the police against the LI editorial team for failure to censor the comments - especially given that LI has the ability and resources to censor anti-individual comments.

REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE CENSOR THE COMMENTS NOW THAT IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION.