Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Other
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Deals
Courts
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences


Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

Karanjawala faces ‘innocuous’ bar council complaint in MJ Akbar case, apologises over missing lawyers’ details

Karanjawala lawyers in MJ Akbar were missing personal details, according to BC complaintKaranjawala lawyers in MJ Akbar were missing personal details, according to BC complaint

Karanjawala & Co said it is unfazed by the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) complaint against it over its client MJ Akbar’s defamation suit, and has apologised to the BCD.

A Hindi online portal Streekal had complained to the Bar Council of India (BCI) on 16 October that Karanjawala had breached bar council rules as its Vakalatnama (plea to act for a client in court) was missing the complete details of all of the 97 lawyers that the firm had said were acting for Akbar.

Karanjawala managing partner Raian Karanjawala commented: “It is basically the normal standard procedure. three or four of [the advocates acting in the case but mentioned on the Vakalatnama] did not have [name, enrolment number and contact details] on the Vakalatnama. We’ve written to the bar council saying we’re sorry for that. Also, by way of suggestion, have asked to change [the Vakalatnama to reflect full details].”

He added that the complaint was “innocuous”.

Karanjawala’s Vakalatnama to act for former journalist MJ Akbar in his criminal defamation case against a female journalist who had accused him of sexual harassment had gone viral on social media on 15 October, in-part for carrying a list of 97 lawyers on the side of Akbar.

“A [Karanjawala] representative said the vakalatnama with the 97 names is the staple one for all cases that the firm takes up. She said the associates who will deal with the case have been named on the website livelaw.in. Livelaw has listed senior partner Sandeep Kapur, principal associate Veer Sandhu, senior associates Niharika Karanjawala, Apoorva Pandey, Mayank Datta and associate Gudipati G. Kashyap as the lawyers through whom the petition was filed,” The Telegraph had reported earlier.

Photo by Mubasshir Mushtaq.

Click to show 5 comments
at your own risk
(alt+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.

Latest comments