Ashurst shuts down Indian office; Not unhappy

Office closed
Office closed

Ashurst has decided to close its Delhi liaison office following the outcome of the Lawyers Collective case. However, the office closure was already on the cards two months before the judgment, according to the firm.

On 16 December 2009 the Bombay High Court had ruled, inter alia, that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) should not have granted Ashurst a licence to open a liaison office in India, as first reported on LegallyIndia.com.

Ashurst said in a statement: “In view of the Bombay High Court’s decision in the Lawyers’ Collective case, we have decided not to apply for an extension of the current licence for our New Delhi liaison office, which expires on 22 February 2010.

“The Indian market has moved on significantly since we established our liaison office in 1994 and our India business is not dependant on a continuing liaison office.”

Ashurst India group head Richard Gubbins told Legally India: “I came to the conclusion some time ago that we have a naturally successful India platform outside the confines of the liaison office.”

The firm’s statement noted: “Having considered for some time the future of our liaison office, we concluded that our India business has reached a level of maturity whereby a presence on the ground in India no longer provides the benefit it once did. In that sense, the ruling of the Bombay High Court has merely accelerated a decision that we had already taken.”

Gubbins explained that Ashurst’s India group partners had unanimously decided at an October 2009 partners’ meeting - almost two months before the judgment - to gradually begin to wind down the Delhi office because of the large cost and India’s changing legal landscape.

Ashurst’s Delhi office is headed by retired India Administrative Service (IAS) officer Ashok Mubayi, whose formal retainer with the firm will also end with the office closure.

“He has been an extremely loyal friend and trusted adviser to the firm for the past 15 years and following the closure of our liaison office I am sure we will continue to seek his guidance and advice which we have found so valuable over the years,” commented Gubbins.

“The same is true with all the other friendships that we have forged in India over this time.”

Ashurst’s statement also noted that the firm had never breached the terms of its RBI licence, that it never practiced law from the liaison office and that the RBI had renewed its licence continually for 15 years.

“Our commitment to India remains as strong as ever and is in no way diminished by the closure of our liaison office,” it said, adding: “We still believe that the opening up of the Indian legal market would not only benefit the legal community in India but would also help the continued growth of international business in India.”

Read on for a full interview with Gubbins and his views on India, the future and grey hairs.

Photo by renaissancechambara

Comments

Anonymous 19 Feb 2010, 18:55
+0 -0
The fact of the matter is that Ashurst, like most other international firms, haven't got a clue about what they want to do in India and how to successfully build an India practice. Simply getting on a flight to India every week and turning up and announcing that "We're XYZ Firm, give us work", is not enough to get clients in India to start instructing the international firms. There is very little value that an international firm can add to a client's domestic Indian legal work and both clients and Indian firms recognize this.

All one has to do is look at the 15 years that Ashurst spent in India.. and the little that they have to show for it...
Anonymous 19 Feb 2010, 20:33
+0 -0
Ears to the ground for the "best friends" announcement.