No more Nalsar ‘DJ Parties’ | GNLU arbitrary admissions | RTI exhumes explosive SEBI letter to PM | SC judges post-retirement posts | Delhi HC on child marriage prohibition statutes

Inebriating DJs
Inebriating DJs

‘DJ Parties’ get banned on Nalsar Hyderabad Campus, after a 30 July emergency meeting of the college’s proctoral board where it ‘expressed anguish and disapproval of students indulging in mass intoxication’ during the fresher’s party this year. The board also decided that the college’s cultural committee would be held ‘vicariously responsible’ if any student brings any liquor on campus or is found in an inebriated condition. [Aap Nalsarite Hain]

GNLU Gandhinagar faces allegations of selectively calling for admission candidates who secured marks below the cut-off of 112/200. Senior forest official alleges that his daughter was not informed of such call despite securing 106 marks, which were more than the marks of candidates informed of the call [TOI]

RTI reveals former SEBI whole-time member KM Abraham’s letter to the PM highlighting ‘pressure’ from ‘vested interests’ on SEBI chairman UK Sinha. Sinha sought lenient regulatory enforcement from Abraham in various matters including that of the Sahara Group of Companies, Reliance Industries, Bank of Rajasthan and MCX-SX. Leniency included neglecting to advertise unfavourable court orders in the newspaper for investors’ sake, pushing through the ‘consent mechanism’ for settling infringement cases, and ‘compromise’ in SEBI orders facilitated through out-of-course vetting by the SEBI executive director [Letter]

18 of 21 SC judges retire to get jobs in various gov’t commissions, often recommended by the CJI. E.g.: wwBhandari at ICJ, Mukundakam Sharma at Vasundhara water disputes tribunal, Ashok Bhan at NCDRC chair, AK Ganguly at West bengal HRC chair, Sirpurkar at CAT chair, SB Sinha at TDSAT chair, AK Mathur at the armed forces tribunal chair [Indian Express]

Delhi HC bench of Sikri, Khanna and Shali gives overriding effect to the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, answering a division bench reference asking to harmonise the act with the IPC and other personal laws in India. The Act makes marriage with a minor girl ‘voidable’ instead of ‘void’. The court clarified that just because a marriage is not void, the husband does not automatically get custody of his minor wife. The court also held that consummation of marriage with a girl below age 15 is rape despite her consent or religious dicta [TOI]

Comments

NALSARite 31 Jul 2012, 16:50
+2 -0
Legally India - NALSAR's weekly newsletter. :P
Nalsarite 3 Aug 2012, 13:33
+0 -0
A old friend of mine once said: Agar log tumhare baare mein baatein kare to samajh lo ki tum taraki kar rahe ho...

so nalsar should be happy about these posts
jammy 31 Jul 2012, 16:56
+3 -0
lagta hai Legally India ka NALSAR ka bukhaar abhi tak utra nahi.
2.8 Kms 31 Jul 2012, 17:12
+5 -0
With the passing out of the 'Pind' from NALSAR this was bound happen. LI, please take note this is nothing to do with anything related to drinking but the Proctor Board called an emergency meeting as there was no capable DJ left in the college.
Phew 31 Jul 2012, 21:25
+1 -0
[quote name="2.8 Kms"]With the passing out of the 'Pind' from NALSAR this was bound happen. LI, please take note this is nothing to do with anything related to drinking but the Proctor Board called an emergency meeting as there was no capable DJ left in the college.[/quote]

Thanks but we're glad that the likes of [...] have left. Absolute waste of space, both of them, and most of the 'Pind' as well. All that 'I'm sexy and I know it' from his room made my head ache and stomach turn.
mamba 31 Jul 2012, 17:47
+1 -0
aye to the seniors man...dj sucked big time ...we need the pind dj back yo!!!! as sumone rightly pointd out "there is too much of s*x in nalsar"
Maata 1 Aug 2012, 16:59
+3 -0
Who cares about the DJ???
ALcohol and sex, that's what these parties are about
chu chu 31 Jul 2012, 19:17
+5 -0
mera time table nahi mil raha please upload kar do LI
Noojies! 31 Jul 2012, 19:26
+1 -0
HAHA! guys should come to NUJS and then you will see what partying is about.
NALSARite 1 Aug 2012, 07:52
+7 -0
You guys have serious attention issues.
NLSIUSTUDENT 3 Aug 2012, 17:37
+2 -0
^^NUJS is really the HUB of law school partying!!!
LI 31 Jul 2012, 21:27
+3 -0
Seriously, do you guys have nothing else to report on? And shamelessly chepofying the ANH picture as well, tsk tsk.
KVS 31 Jul 2012, 22:02
+0 -0
If anything this only shows that NALSARites party hard!
Saar 1 Aug 2012, 02:15
+2 -0
Saar, what has been the SBC president doing, Saar? Do some "Setting" with the VC Saar, Saar?
Jay 1 Aug 2012, 03:39
+1 -0
We would like a separate story on the Nalsar incident, also because there are serious constitutional issues involved (moral policing etc). LI gives coverage to many stupid stories about deals by law firms, but this story should get more coverage.
Wow 1 Aug 2012, 08:28
+4 -0
[quote name="Jay"]We would like a separate story on the Nalsar incident, also because there are serious constitutional issues involved (moral policing etc). LI gives coverage to many stupid stories about deals by law firms, but this story should get more coverage.[/quote]

Wow seriously! Sure. Kian, please do not focus on deal tables, deal reportings, law firms. who wants that crap right? Who is in law school to focus on getting a good job after and learning some gyaan on the market anyway right? Lets talk about who got drunk at which party, who did whom and where instead and cull out some nonsense "constitutional" issue!! so much more meaningful!! You are something else man.

Im waiting to see the day when comment to an LI article do not degenerate into BS like the above, NLS v NUJS v NALSAR v .. AZB v AMSS .. typos in the article itself! get a life you guys seriously. grow up. your comments display your serious immaturity.
jammy 1 Aug 2012, 12:33
+0 -0
who asked you to read the comments then, smartass?
Wow 1 Aug 2012, 12:53
+0 -0
in the hope that someone will finally say something mature. clearly you're not one of them. You seem to be saying that it should be expected comments will only fly this low - wonderful!
jammy 1 Aug 2012, 17:03
+0 -0
dont be dense. all im saying is that people talk. if you dont want to be privy to their conversation, then butt out. you cannot dictate as to who can say what when.
Wow 2 Aug 2012, 12:25
+0 -0
Jammy (and I'm assuming and truly hoping you are not jay).. point taken. people do talk and I can't dictate. and there are always a huge bunch that I imagine login and just wait with glee to pick at this stuff. But doesn't it bother you at all that comments ever so often stoop so low? So yes everyones free to talk crap. And Im sure you will agree I sure as hell am equally entitled to call it as i see it! without anyone dictating that i don't. right?
jammy 6 Aug 2012, 08:02
+0 -0
what is a jay??
Wow 6 Aug 2012, 11:31
+0 -0
oh man. the guy that started this thread! the first comment # 10. is by some jay
DP Fan 1 Aug 2012, 04:30
+3 -0
the Pind, must be more than delighted to read all this...didnt know a term coined so casually, will go on to actually become an identity label for them...but seriously, DP was perhaps the best DJ we ever had
Scooter 1 Aug 2012, 05:48
+2 -0
kala chashma still plays on loop in my head!! yuck!
Punjabbbi!!! 1 Aug 2012, 07:00
+1 -0
From what we have heard, a certain Non-Pindi from that batch is back at NALSAR.
Vicarious Liability 1 Aug 2012, 09:20
+1 -0
I was agahst to read about the NALSAR news, no it is not the ban on 'DJ Parties' but the following lines.... "The board also decided that the college’s cultural committee would be held ‘vicariously responsible’ if any student brings any liquor on campus or is found in an inebriated condition."

The next time a young lawyer tries to argue about the 'vicarious liability' concept of English law, I know where that lawyer comes from!
Zal A 2 Aug 2012, 09:39
+0 -0
Ermm or argue the difference between Vicarious Liability and Vicourious Responsibility ... Facking Weird!

Don't expect this from law school like Nalsar
Speakup President 2 Aug 2012, 05:21
+2 -0
So many people "pounced" and Mr. President, where were you?
Busy in fencing, ah?
WTF? 6 Aug 2012, 07:18
+0 -0
[quote name="Speakup President"]So many people "pounced" and Mr. President, where were you?
Busy in fencing, ah?[/quote]
you too read the mail?
shameonLI 2 Aug 2012, 06:52
+0 -0
shameonyou kian.

dont you have better things to report about.

how is this in readers interest? why should anyone care about DJ parties in NALSAR.

LI has to be renamed- as illegally natlawschool .