GNLU V Donnie Ashok; Life sentence for dowry-killings; SC upholds quota-cancellation; SEBI tweaks P-note scrutiny; Libya detains ICC staff…

GNLU Gandhinagar allegedly violates own admission regulations: denies admission to successful CLAT 2012 candidate Donnie Ashok, on the ground that Ashok cleared his senior secondary school board examination in the second attempt. Ashok petitions to Ahmedabad HC, through educational trust IDIA. Court directs GNLU to save one admission-vacancy until further direction [Idially]

SC justices Ranjan Gogoi and Swatanter Kumar hold that life sentence for dowry death cannot be mitigated on any count, when accused brutally kills woman and claims false defence of accident, after non-satisfaction of dowry demands [Firstpost]

SC justices KS Radhakrishnan and JS Khehar refuse to stay AP HC order quashing 4.5 per cent minority sub quota in central gov’t institutions. The judges question AG Vahanvati on challenging HC order without any supporting documents validating quota; Vahanvati argues that 325 candidates have already qualified for IIT seats under the sub quota [PTI]

SEBI tightens scrutiny on P-note transactions by FIIs: Cuts down time-limit for reporting them from bi-annual to monthly [Business Standard] [Circular]

Four International Criminal Court staff members get detained in Libya after attempting to meet son of late Libyan leader Gaddafi; Libyan representative at ICC says the ICC staff are “under house arrest” in Libya and “not in prison” [BBC]

National Council on Land Reforms chaired by PM and formed to offset failure to amend Land Acquisition Bill, has not met even once in four years of its formation [TOI]

The UK is set to criminalize forced marriage to distinguish it from arranged marriage; Legislation will be introduced in 2013-2014 parliamentary session, and will commit £500,000 to victim support [Law Gazette]

Content-sharing website Pinterest hires Google’s deputy general counsel as head of legal, after a lawyer-cum-user highlights how the website hosts copyrighted content without consent of copyright owners [Business Insider]

UK home secretary Theresa May holds rights of foreign prisoners against deportation more important than right to family life enshrined in European Convention of Human Rights; Forewarns judges of her intention to bring in primary legislation if they failed to implement new rules[Guardian]

Comments

Big Belly 11 Jun 2012, 14:40
+1 -0
Ahmedabad HC! *shudder* - Its the Gujarat High Court
kianganz 11 Jun 2012, 14:48
+5 -0
I'd argue "Ahmedabad HC" is perfectly fine as an abbreviation in a brief Legally Wired news item, akin to saying Gujarat's high court, the Gujarat high court, the High Court of Gujarat in Ahmedabad, or the Ahmedabad high court.

There is only one high court in Ahmedabad, therefore there is no risk of confusion or inaccuracy in this case.
Source 11 Jun 2012, 17:13
+0 -0
Whats the source for the GNLU story? B&B?
Not Sure I Agree 12 Jun 2012, 03:19
+1 -0
I don't know about this. So, it's OK to say "Washington D.C. Supreme Court" instead of the U.S. Supreme Court? Plus, Gujarat is shorter than Ahmedabad, so I am not sure if brevity was really the reason either. I mean, it's really not a big deal what whether we call it the Gujarat High Court or Ahmedabad High Court, but I am not sure I agree with the argument. That's all.
Dear Einstein 12 Jun 2012, 03:41
+2 -0
"Gujarat" is shorter than "Ahmedabad", but it seems longer than "The High Court of Gujarat in Ahmedabad", or even "Gujarat HC in Ahmedabad".

The office here seems to be referred to by location instead of full nomenclature. Perhaps LI assumed that intelligent readers like yourself will gauge that it can only point to the ONE high court of the state that location/city is part of!

Yes, besides you, others too know that a state and not a city has it's own high court!!
Wow. 12 Jun 2012, 06:36
+2 -0
[quote name="Dear Einstein"]"Gujarat" is shorter than "Ahmedabad", but it seems longer than "The High Court of Gujarat in Ahmedabad", or even "Gujarat HC in Ahmedabad".

The office here seems to be referred to by location instead of full nomenclature. Perhaps LI assumed that intelligent readers like yourself will gauge that it can only point to the ONE high court of the state that location/city is part of!

Yes, besides you, others too know that a state and not a city has it's own high court!![/quote]

The existence of intelligent readers does not provide any legitimacy to LI to use patently false terminology especially when referring to the Courts.
Dude. 12 Jun 2012, 06:32
+0 -0
[quote name="kianganz"]I'd argue "Ahmedabad HC" is perfectly fine as an abbreviation in a brief Legally Wired news item, akin to saying Gujarat's high court, the Gujarat high court, the High Court of Gujarat in Ahmedabad, or the Ahmedabad high court.

There is only one high court in Ahmedabad, therefore there is no risk of confusion or inaccuracy in this case.[/quote]

The potential for confusion is irrelevant. Just because there is only one HC in Karnataka, that doesn't provide the author leeway to call it the Bangalore HC. Sigh.
kianganz 12 Jun 2012, 07:00
+2 -0
This does seem like a slightly silly debate, but for the sake of mild entertainment and for future reference, allow me to explain the rationale again. "Ahmedabad high court" is descriptive and a fine short form, so long as we don't say the "Ahmedabad High Court" (in capitals), which would misrepresent the proper name of the court. "Ahmedabad HC", as an obvious descriptive abbreviation should be fine in any case.

Similarly, there are different ways of describing all sorts of courts or institutions. It is fine to say the "apex court" instead of the "Supreme Court of India", and if it was commonly understood you could also say the "Delhi supreme court", though it would sound a little strange in this case because there is only a single Supreme Court of India, but if you were trying to differentiate it from the Washington one, for example, it could be appropriate.

All good? :)
Modi 12 Jun 2012, 08:29
+1 -0
I think we're all missing the really important point that the phrase brings out. Why is the High Court of Gujarat in Ahmedabad? LI, please start a petition to move it to Gandhinagar, the capital of the state and the moral capital of India. Maybe decision making will also improve
randomanonymous 12 Jun 2012, 09:52
+0 -0
Much ado about nothing :) stop nitpicking, people.
Legal Dodo 11 Jun 2012, 17:11
+0 -0
"Shudder" to think what heights LI would have reached had its staff (Kian particularly) not wasted precious time replying to jobless fault finders.
kianganz 11 Jun 2012, 17:45
+0 -0
Re: Sourcing - We talked to the advocates by email and on the phone but chose not to publish as a longer story due to the raft of recent CLAT stories, and since this story only directly affects one test taker at the moment.

Best wishes
Kian
Jal Cooper 12 Jun 2012, 04:32
+1 -0
Life Sentences for Dowry Death is the right decision by the SC. Even now in the UK they are slowly beginning to deal with such issues amongst the South Asian community there.
#ShadowWarrior 12 Jun 2012, 11:26
+0 -0
I am sorry... how is that relevant here ? Or did you just wake up and realize the hyperspace bypass hasn't happened ?
To Psuedo Douglas 15 Jun 2012, 10:00
+0 -0
Please read the headlines.
Lawstudent 15 Jun 2012, 09:33
+0 -0
One more initiative by IDIA team !! commendable job