Q1 M&A activity tanks, firms fight for scraps: AZB, Trilegal, DSK, Platinum ‘win’

Q1 M&A: In terrible shape
Q1 M&A: In terrible shape
AZB & Partners did the greatest number of deals (13) in the first quarter of this year, according to the mergermarket M&A deal rankings.

Q1 M&A: In terrible shape
Q1 M&A: In terrible shape
AZB & Partners has done the greatest number of deals (13) in the first quarter of this year, according to the mergermarket M&A deal rankings release today, followed by Trilegal, Khaitan & Co and Amarchand Mangaldas.

This quarter’s biggest deal – the $1.6bn sale of Strides Arcolab’s subsidiary to Nasdaq-listed generic drugs-maker Mylan Inc – propelled DSK Legal and Platinum Partners to the top of the value league table.

Although AZB’s reported deals increased by six this quarter, the value of those deals at $510m has decreased by 77 per cent as against the same quarter in 2012.

Trilegal acted on eight M&A deals worth $188m in total – five more deals than were reported in the same period last year. Khaitan & Co’s reported deal count dropped by four to six with a value of $67m, while Amarchand dropped from 12 in the first quarter of 2013 to four now (total value of $107m).

Also on the league table are Desai & Diwanji with four deals, and MNK Law Offices – a Delhi-based law firm set up in 1996 - and J Sagar Associates (JSA), all with aggregate deal values below $100m.

Values game

The values league table for the first quarter has been dominated by nine advisers on the $1.6bn Strides Arcolab Mylan takeover, of whom DSK and Platinum are India-based.

Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy and White & Case got a $537m bump from Manila Electric Company and FPM Power Holdings buy of a power plant in Singapore from GMR Infrastructure.

Comparatively dry?

In the same time period last year, Amarchand and Luthra & Luthra each had more than $10bn of M&A deals to their name on the back of the $10.3bn Sesa Goa and Sterlite Industries merger. AZB had amassed more than $2bn, while S&R Associates and Khaitan & Co (ranked sixth and seventh respectively last year) had a volume tally of more than $500m.

In the 2012 calendar year league table, Desai Diwanji had topped the volume table with 43 reported deals worth $1.4bn, followed by Amarchand (39 deals of $20bn), Khaitan with (34 deals totalling $2.3bn), AZB (26 deals / $4.6bn), DSK (17 deals / $1.5bn), Trilegal (17 deals / $750m) and J Sagar Associates (JSA) (14 deals / $660m). .

Macro

In the first quarter of this year, the total M&A deals in India slumped by more than 80 per cent to only $2.9bn, according to mergermarket data, or by 58 per cent if excluding 2012 giant Sesa Goa deal. Outbound deal from India were at their lowest since Q3 of 2010 at only $600m. The total announced deal volume decreased from 77 to 55, in a Q1 year-by-year comparison. Deal activity in the Asia Pacific region was almost as lacklustre, dropping by 26 per cent by value.

Download full mergermarket press release from here

Rank (Q1 2012)Rank (Q1 2013)FirmValue (US$m)# Deals% Value
ChangeQ1 2012Q1 2013
-1=Barbosa, Mussnich & Aragao1,6001-
81=DSK Legal1,600173.70%
-1=Haynes and Boone1,6001-
121=Herbert Smith Freehills1,6001305.10%
-1=Morgan Lewis & Bockius1,6001-
-1=Pinheiro Neto Advogados1,6001-
-1=Platinum Partners1,6001-
31=Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom1,6001-84.40%
-1=Slaughter and May1,6001-
-10Webber Wentzel5481-
-11=Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy5371
-11=White & Case5371
513AZB & Partners51013-76.30%
2214Trilegal188822.10%
-15=Lawrence Graham1511-
-15=Norton Rose1511-
Rank (Q1 2012)Rank (Q1 2013)FirmValue (US$m)# DealsChange in deals #
51AZB & Partners510136
82Trilegal18885
33Khaitan & Co676-4
24Amarchand Mangaldas1074-8
15Desai & Diwanji264-11
-6MNK Law Offices5933
97J Sagar Associates253-
528DLA Piper4521
79Nishith Desai Associates412-3
-10Argus Partners1122
611K Law02-4
-12Barbosa, Mussnich & Aragao1,60011
413DSK Legal1,6001-7
-14Haynes and Boone1,60011
1315Herbert Smith Freehills1,6001-1
-16Morgan Lewis & Bockius1,60011
-17Pinheiro Neto Advogados1,60011
-18Platinum Partners1,60011
2119Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom1,6001-
-20Slaughter and May1,60011

Source: mergermarket

Comments

hm... 11 Apr 2013, 12:05
+0 -0
markets are really rough if amss has seen just 4 closings in one quarter and that too of total value of about a 100 mill USD.
Phoenix 11 Apr 2013, 12:12
+11 -2
So S&R is down 100%. Whoa, that and other numbers must be hard for the respective firms. Do we see another round of M&A in the law firm space now. Client ka nahin to apna M&A hi sahi.
S&R 11 Apr 2013, 16:56
+1 -5
S&R isn't down 100%..its a full service law firm, has the capability to leverage on the strength of other practice groups.. with that thought, fly away Mr. Phoenix :)
kianganz 11 Apr 2013, 12:15
+1 -1
I ought to add here that such league tables don't provide a 100% accurate picture. For example, a firm may not have had permission to disclose a deal from a client, or they may never have got around to sending out a press release.

Also, they don't track closings but announced deals.

For reference, here are the criteria that mergermarket uses:
[quote]All data is based on announced transactions over US$ 5m. Deals with undisclosed deal values are included where the target’s turnover exceeds US$ 10m. Deals where the stake acquired is less than 10% will only be included if their value is greater than US$ 100m. Activities excluded include property transactions and restructurings where the ultimate shareholders’ interests are not changed. All data excludes minority stake deals (10% -30%) where the dominant target geography is Asia-Pacific and the deal value is less than US$ 100m.[/quote]
hm... 11 Apr 2013, 12:15
+0 -0
in a quarter amss with all its 500 people and many offices has closed just 4 deals that too around 100 mill USD. this is a sign of difficult times for the market. similarly, slaughter and Norton just 1 closing? and wonder why 1600 mill usd is the deal size of so many..
kianganz 11 Apr 2013, 12:19
+0 -0
Please do read the article :) - it provides an answer (at least to your latter question) - a bunch of firms were on the Strides Arcolab $1.6bn deal.

To be fair, the picture is often like that in the first quarter league tables, since there might be one stand-out massive deal that distorts the rankings, while many firms may also have under-reported their deal invovements.

Things might adjust a little, though the picture doesn't look great for Q1 anyway.
hm... 11 Apr 2013, 12:32
+0 -0
ok that is interesting. thanks.
Just Saying 11 Apr 2013, 13:08
+0 -0
Only those deals are reported which are over USD 5m or where the target’s turnover exceeds USS 10m. I know of many firms (even the Biggies) who have done deals which didn't meet any of the above parameters - hence didn't get reported. So in my humble view, the above by merger markets might not capture the complete picture.
Jayanti 11 Apr 2013, 16:04
+2 -4
This report is hard to believe!! No way AMSS with all its mega-offices has just four report-worthy deals. Dear Kian, this gives a wrong view of a firm whose M and A practice is quite a bit ahead of Khaitan and AZB and in the last few months AMSS has stolen some very lucrative deals.
Anon 12 Apr 2013, 05:40
+6 -1
And people believed that Trilegal was reliant on A&O for work!