Inox taps Khaitan yet again for Rs 182 cr buy of Luthra-client Satyam Cineplexes

Inox: Buying cinemas like it's going out of style
Inox: Buying cinemas like it's going out of style

Khaitan & Co Delhi has advised cinema giant and long-standing client Inox on its Rs 182 crore complete acquisition of Satyam Cineplexes, which drafted in Luthra & Luthra.

Khaitan Delhi partner Bharat Anand led on the deal for Inox, together with associate partner Joyjyoti Misra assisted by direct tax executive director Daksha Baxi and indirect tax executive director Arvind Baheti and associate partner Kabir Bogra. Grant Thornton Advisory was financial adviser to the deal.

Anand, commenting on Khaitan’s long-standing relationship with Inox, said that an Inox acquisition was actually the first deal he worked on when he returned to India in 2009 from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, and Khaitan Mumbai partners Haigreve Khaitan and Rabindra Jhunjhunwala have been advising the acquisitive cinema group on many other deals.

In 2010, for instance, Khaitan acted for Inox in its Rs 66 crore stake purchase of the Fame India multiplex chain.

my first deal when i came back to india was for Inox - when they bought a facility in Houston - and haigreve.

Luthra’s team for Satyam is understood to have been led by senior partner Bobby Chandhoke, with BMR Advisors handling financial advice for the company.

The deal, which includes Inox taking on Rs 60 crore of Satyam’s debt and the repayment of Satyam-investor IFCI, would give this a total deal size of Rs 240 crore, reported Mint. Inox’s footprint will expand to 358 screens in 50 cities and 91 cinemas with Satyam, within touching distance of market leader PVR that has 421 screens.

Photo by Leo Hidalgo

Comments

WWW 7 Aug 2014, 10:11
+6 -4
Kian - Please report deals either in USD or INR. Just because INR 182 CR sounds bigger than USD 30 million... it is just misleading and sometime says more than about the lawyers working on the deal...
XXX 7 Aug 2014, 17:33
+2 -3
INR 182 Cr probably because both the parties are based in India. Had it been an inbound or an outbound transaction, it probably would have been in USD.
kianganz 7 Aug 2014, 17:55
+2 -0
To be honest, we use USD and INR kind of interchangably sometimes, but yes, as XXX says, in an all-Indian deal we're more likely to be using INR as other reports in newspapers do too, though it's not a hard and fast rule...
Objectivity? 12 Aug 2014, 15:04
+3 -1
Your coverage of this piece clearly demonstrates the bias and slant (albeit subtle) that is typically shown towards Khaitan coverage in all LI articles. It would be interesting to find out how many articles that LI has covered which are critical of Khaitan. This deal had one lawyer each, one for the seller and one for the buyer. It is quite apparent to all how the seller's lawyer has been covered in this piece. Strangely, your coverage where Khaitan is seller counsel has been quite different. It is all subtle, but at the same time quite apparent to all those who are observant.
kianganz 12 Aug 2014, 15:08
+2 -2
Thanks for your feedback, but I think it's fine as it is to be honest... :)

Khaitan had sent out the press release with all the partner and associate details, and we happened to speak to the partner involved to get a quote.

Many partners are worried about being quoted in deals, but those who are happy to comment when we chat to them we're happy to quote, so we can give the story a bit more of an angle than just listing out who did what.