We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Every draw back mentioned here is something neurotypical and neurodivergent is going to have to deal with. That said not every NLU is going to provide the same level of mental health support, and it would be wise to inquire with alumni and students to understand the level of support your child might get there.
oh the good ol days
How I miss thee
In a way, over-moderation could even protect reckless posters from themselves. A far-fetched hypothetical, perhaps, but imagine LI is sued and then faces a court order seeking identifying information about a poster. Even assuming LI is technically capable of producing that information (which I doubt it is), why would it want to run that risk when aggressive moderation can nip the issue in the bud?
I'm not saying LI's approach is justified. But there is an argument that a platform where some discussion survives (even if heavily censored) may be preferable to having no platform for anonymous commentary at all.
AZB is the only one that doesn't shortlist basis rank, they do their shortlisting in the GI rounds
The problem is when incompetent students who have studied in Delhi, Bombay, B'Lore their entire life and were unable to crack CLAT with ranks in the 1000s, in spite of having access to the best resources, and having gone to the best schools in the cities, exploit this loophole, thus making mockery of meritorious students.
The foreign national quota (eg. NALSAR) is even worse, as I see students who had ranks in the 10,000s and 12th grade marks of 70% make it in, solely owing to their citizenship status; one should have studied for a minimum number of years in that country (eg. NLS set it at 10 years of education) to be eligible, but such is not the case.
PA Inamdar's dual justification doesn't apply to any of them, and funnily enough the bench in PA Inamdar noted this too.
There are other judgements which have echoed my sentiment too; thus to say that an argument such as mine one will stand is not entirely far fetched.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/supreme-court-punjabs-nri-quota-criteria-a-fraud-on-medical-education/articleshow/113648517.cms
https://www.shadesofknife.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Ishika-Patnaik-Vs-National-Law-University-of-Odisha-and-Ors-on-20-Oct-2020.pdf (read from para. 11)
The structural problem here is that NLUs are run by states, not the centre, but fighting that battle would be way more difficult as of now.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aquilaw_certain-rumours-and-speculations-are-being-activity-7470849460487667713-Htxs
I've done my LLB from a tier 1 NLU and my LLM from a local private university. The difference is not in the brand, but what you make of the brand. I was lazy and stupid during my LLB and I didn't capitalise on the opportunities there. Just spent days doing makrabaazi. Almost dropped out.
Later, I joined an LLM in a private university since I couldn't even clear CLAT PG. So I took the opportunity and just ran with it. Every single thing that was happening in the university, I applied for, and participated, connected and worked around.
In the end, I joined a tier 1 law firm. It wasn't because of the brand, it was because of the hustle I did for that one year.
The drawback, I arrived a year later in the same firm my batchmates had already secured a year prior. It wasn't the brand that cost me, it was my own laziness.
The famous Dr. APJ Kalam was from MIT, not Massachusetts but Madras, and that didn't deter him to be one of the greatest. Brands show you the door, ultimately you are the one who has to walk through it.
Forget about brands and tiers, focus on your skills and knowledge, opportunities will come, be ready for them.
Central Universities have the unlimited tax budget from the government and these newer universities are backed by Mahindra, Ambani, Times group etc. NLUs have neither.
In the future the only one's surviving will be the tier1 NLUs, and even those will start charging 10 lakhs per annum soon.
It's all about the money ,honey.
To add some context- I recently went to an older relative's house in a hill station. The slower lifestyle with a traditional grandparents' house feel was appealing, but at the same time boring for everyday. Moreover, corporate practices are centred around Delhi & Mumbai, so remote work also has the appeal of allowing all of us to live in cities we actually want to instead of these concrete jungles. Mainly, i think the thing holding us back is a lack of trust in our own productivity when and if we become more comfortable.
I could (didn't) focus on studies during COVID years and suddenly was graduated. Started in a chamber of young first gen independent lawyer in Delhi. After working there for 20-22 months started applying everywhere. No one replied or showed interest. Was depressed for a bit; connected with a friend who was in disputes at tier 1, told her about suicidal thoughts and confidence issues. She managed to get me an interview with other partner of her firm. Couldn't clear it. But realised that pitching negative possibilities gets you attention and people tend to help. Started emotionally blackmailing 5-6 of my colleague working at reputed disputes team. They all landed me an interview and I landed at panag and babu. Stayed there for next 2 years and have switched to disputes team in a T1 in Bombay.
All i would say is that it all works out in the end. I hardly had any internships worth even talking about, yet today I'm securely placed and content with my work and position.
Even if you're capable of it, your international LLM from Cambridge would cost you around 70 lakhs... And atleast that's intellectually worth the money.
Similarly, NLUD and NUJS seem to have seen a slight dip, but nothing dramatically different from previous years.
The broader trend appears to be that Tier 1 firms were relatively more conservative this time, while Tier 2 firms, boutiques, and in-house teams expanded hiring. This is also reflecting in BO 2027 hiring, where a substantial chunk of PPOs seem to be coming from Tier 2 and boutique firms. So overall placement numbers across top NLUs have remained largely stable, with only minor variations (which is fairly normal year-to-year), even if the composition of recruiters has shifted somewhat from tier 1 to other players in the market.
Also, the current PPO numbers are not necessarily unprecedented. If you look through official placement reports of most tier 1 NLUs from previous years, the average PPO count is usually somewhere in the early to mid-20s range (or even lesser!). There is also still about a month left before Day Zero, and a significant number of students tend to get placed immediately before the process begins.
If you scroll through old threads on this website long enough, youβll notice that almost every batch has had a similar round of concerns about the market. At the end of the day, all students and universities can really do is diversify risk instead of depending excessively on Tier 1 recruitment alone.
Don't just say because they order old. Symbiosis is much older and yet can not even match 20% of the placements of NLS/NALSAR/NUJS ?
My friend and I were talking to someone from Christ Bangalore who was interning along with some other students from NLS/NUJS. I prepped for CLAT back in the day and managed to get NALSAR with under 100 rank (Yes there was a time when NLS didn't have 100 seats for UG) and back in the day I used to hear about Christ being really good. However the intern told me, they try to slip of their college names in convos so as to not make it obvious they are from christ or else it brings them shame.
I do not support this "College Brand" culture. Yet who cares, the people above me will still go to Bangalore or kolkata for just 1 college.
Look at Ganloo's placements, it's just below NLS NALSAR NUJS, and above NLUJ.
Although GNLU trolls on this website are a nuisance, the college itself is T1 for solid 5-6 years now
And now⦠AAP has defected en masse, the TMC is finished as a party, almost all the SS UBT MPs are looking to switch, and the DMK will probably have a back door understanding with the BJP.
Meanwhile, the CJP has proved to be a dud: mostly a bunch of jobless Insta boys with bot followers.
So basically our pluralist and socialist Constitution is all set to be amended wholesale and India will be turned into a Right Wing Rashtra.
Iβm part of the 2026 batch and recently got placed in a T1 firmβs Indirect Tax practice. Iβve interned fairly extensively in IDT across different firms and with smaller practitioners, so Iβm not walking in completely blind, but Iβd be lying if I said Iβm not nervous about the probation period.
I started on June 1st, and the 6-month probation feels like itβs looming over everything. I know the work itself (drafting, research, briefings) but Iβm worried about things like:
β’ How to manage the pace and volume of work at a big firm vs. internships
β’ What seniors actually look for during probation (beyond just βgood workβ)
β’ How to handle feedback/criticism without it knocking my confidence
β’ Tips on building a good rapport with the team early on
β’ Any common mistakes first-years make that I should watch out for
Iβd really appreciate any advice, big or small.
Thanks in advance!
does not help that your country is busy bootlicking Trump's ego cause we have incompetent leaders who need to win votes on religion, or opposition who need reservations to win votes instead of competence.
SAM + CAM = SCAM
(At least that's the censored reason!)
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aquilaw_certain-rumours-and-speculations-are-being-activity-7470849460487667713-Htxs
The statement comes after Kalyan Bandopadhyay went on news channels yesterday alleging that Sanjay Basu, on behalf of Abhishek, removed him as counsel in the hearing concerning Abhishek Banerjee and the MLA signature forgery case.
Also comes after Sucharita Basu recently posted on LinkedIn praising the new BJP government in Bengal.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sucharita-basu-2a93b8107_πππ§π ππ₯-π¬πππ«ππ¬-π-π§ππ°-ππ‘ππ©πππ«-activity-7458804003217264640-JJba
P.S. The claim in the subject line of Aquilaw being βpossibly Kolkataβs richest law firmβ is assuming KCO and SAMβs Kolkata offices to be separate units, rather than a unified national firm. Also assuming that the three Mandal heirs going their separate ways has made each breakaway firm poorer than the unified Fox & Mandal.
This is the only way - coming from an ex-JSA attorney
Diligently sucking up to the tier(s) above and consistently contributing to the partner in questionβs pockets
The new governing body stopped hiring club members as lawyers after it took charge in April 2022. But, records show, that did not bring down the clubβs legal bill β from Rs 1.84 crore in 2021-22 to Rs 2.09 crore in 2022-23. From 2018-19 to 2022-23, records show, the club spent Rs 8.22 crore on litigation.
Noting that βlegal costs have become a material cost incurred by the Clubβ, the 2022-23 auditorβs report repeatedly highlighted legal expenses as an area where verification was difficult because of incomplete records, unavailable legal files, and lack of information regarding the duration and status of litigation matters.
Forget in house counsels, I am privy to live cases where clients (without any in house legal) have used Chat GPT to generate legal notices for claims. The notices seemed more meticulous and slicker than any which would have been drafted by a lawyer !