We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Examples 1 and 3: "Went on holiday/visited with family"
Example 2: "It was my significant other's birthday"
The fact that it is so easy to come up with these round-about phrases should be indication enough of what the environment is like.
https://x.com/ANI/status/2115273518019731827
It's also possible that if you find a chamber whose principal is doing really well, it's likely that that person is on the road to becoming a counsel. As a result they would have stopped dealing with and attracting clients and are focusing more on arguing themselves.
There is no perfect job. I wouldn't put pressure on myself to find the perfect job. I would put pressure on myself to find the job that takes me to the courts that I'm interested in being in.
The general advice during litigation is always to go to an office where there's some state or union panel, because those offices are super busy. You can find out the ins and outs of courts from those offices.
Don’t know why it’s contested? HR doing overtime here lmfao.
There is also Leiden, kings college, vienna which provides tax llm.
1. Modi ecosystem 🤝Didi ecosystem
2. To quote Sai Baba of Shirdi: "Sab ka malik ek" (Gautam bhai)
https://www.barandbench.com/amp/story/news/litigation/calcutta-high-court-blocks-streaming-of-video-on-modi-adani-ties-after-adani-files-for-defamation
it's you and this weird obsession with pedigree and prestige and other factors. what is wrong with you. pls reflect
This thread is dedicated to tracking the post-transfer adventures of RB, AR, SG and PS as they embark on their exciting new journey at SAM.
A few questions for the audience:
- Will a change of address lead to a change of behaviour?
- Will associates finally discover the mythical creature known as healthy team culture?
- Was the problem really the platform all along?
- How many weeks before someone says, it's not what I expected?
Live updates, field reports and associate welfare checks are welcome.
Remember a new logo, new email signature, but same firmware.
For anyone around Lower Parel, butterfly High, Cafe Free India or any one of the places around Kamala mills/Todi Mills
It’s not even that they’re on so many issues that bothers me - it’s that they’re not acting on any principle.
If your goal is to get a job in the UK through an LLM, please consider it a pipe dream. I say this having done my LLM at Oxbridge and having seen people in the recent past who wanted to immigrate struggle to get legal jobs. That being said, there are people who succeed, but more people fail than succeed.
If you want to get into academia, sure, an LLM is a prerequisite, but again, you likely won't recoup the money you spend on an LLM in academia.
So the bottom line is, unless you have the money lying around, an LLM does not make sense. A job is uncertain, and academia will certainly not allow you to recoup your investment. Unfortunate, but true.
Please ignore others who may say it is not worth wasting one year. Do not look at it as a waste, but rather as an investment, where you could save over 40 lakhs in the next five years (if you crack one of the top NLUs) and end up similarly placed (if not marginally better placed depending on the NLU you get into). If you do not get into any NLU, you will know you tried, and JGLS will always be an option.
There is also an alternative option. Do a three-year bachelor's course somewhere in Bangalore while simultaneously preparing for CLAT this year. CLAT is not very demanding, and I believe you should be able to balance it. If you do not get into a top NLU next year (and JGLS will still be as expensive as ever), finish the three-year course and try again for the three-year LLB, which both NLSIU and Jindal offer. The three-year LLB is a very decent option, especially with the right bachelor's degree. It will also be slightly cheaper than the five-year LLB at Jindal. I personally think this is the best way forward.
I give this advice as someone situated in academia, so I am well-versed in giving free (and solid, I think) advice to every prospective law graduate and their parents who happen to think of their friendly neighbourhood law professor when their child starts struggling in science.
RCC has its own timeline, and yes, with my rank it will probably sort itself out inshallah. But how the fuck has RCC, somewhere along the way, become a way for refusing a good CV (apologising in advance for sounding entitled but I have seen the CVs of people who work in those firms)? The point of applying in a free break is that it’s a free break.
Sure I don't believe in merit as a concept, but even by the firms’ own metrics, this CV should at least get opened. Who the fuck are these people saying yes to, and on what basis? Because if this is what the process looks like with a profile that ticks every one of their boxes, I genuinely shudder to think how far not being related to anyone's chachi mami khalla walif gets you.
Probably an early crash out and RCC will deliver in the end, but I’d like it noted that the system is only working for ME because I happen to be in the narrow band it was built for, and it is fucking frustrating that it is not a flex, it is an absolute indictment.
https://x.com/advsanjoy/status/2114934490116301158
https://x.com/SauravDassss/status/2114220158512468091
https://x.com/NileshHW/status/2114257092119007671/photo/2
https://www.instagram.com/p/De6mZwBCfRt/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwArFUwI4sw
Hawww /s
And remember you are not a worker if you are working at CAM and the likes. You are a fee earner. But the irony is that "from each according to his ability, to each according to his contribution" is how law firms models work, which is as socialist as it should get! Just that contribution is defined "in the unreasonable opinion of the firm..."
sure, i can work on my CV and competitions, but im not able to get into the top 10 moots/international ones..
have few citations from ADR & essay writing comps
can someone guide me pls
So yes, people talk about their weekends. but it is always a very filtered version, very pg13 version. thats fine. it is office. it is not your home or your friends or a party.
(Mods please bump this, I drafted and accidentally submitted another post please excuse that)
Now in third year, he has been diagnosed with scrhizo.
Projects
ISDA/derivatives
Int Arb.
a few layers of nothingness
M&A - almost nobody gets a role but its been done by a select few.
When an average person in this country goes to law school they do so them become a "vakeel' or "advocate" and not a corporate lawyer. CLAT takers itself are a tiny fraction of law aspirants. So your placementwala point doesn't make sense.
But I agree with the quality control point, not just for law schools but across fields of study. It's really pathetic to see such limited job opportunities when compared to population of this country (not uniquely an Indian problem but still sad to see)
NLSIU
NALSAR
NLUD
NUJS
NLUJ
GNLU
NLIU
Tier 1 lite
JGLS
Tier 2
MNLUM
HNLU
NLUO
RMLNLU
RGNUL
GLC M
SLS P
Tier 3
NUALS
CHRIST B
CNLU
DSNLU
SLS Noida
DU
NUSRL
NLUJAA
MNLUN
TNNLU
Tier 4
....
The CCI too entered the trap of focusing only on big tech – because that was the only space it was afforded. Because this government thinks Indian data should produce taxable revenue for it, the rest is a sideshow. Like many countries, India used competition law as low-grade lawfare. The Amazon case was transparent. Meanwhile, every concentrated sector with prospective national champions has seen public blowback as ministries are back choosing winners.
The deals CAM does originate elsewhere. It's just minor cross-selling.
Please always count Form IIs as serious merger control work. That pays and is sellable.
I have worked at the Supreme Court with an AOR for around 2 years. I am realising that while litigation is exciting, I need the money (and quickly). While I say this half-jokingly, like is getting serious. I am not sure if I have the risk-appetite needed to wait out the gestation period to get even some respectable money, consistently.
I understand that my best case scenario is dispute team but I would like to explore corp teams as well, if possible.
I would like to know if the lateral move to a decent-paying law firm is possible, especially in a corp team. If yes, then how should I go about it?
Also, how different is the pay between a Disputes team and others in a T1/T2 law firm?
Thanks!