We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
if yes then yeah
Imagine my surprise when I discovered that the same firm is now quietly acting for the opposite party in a connected NCLAT appeal, mere months later. Their attempt to stay invisible collapsed when their signature appeared in the comments of the appeal PDF. The filing is happening through another firm.
We often talk about ethics in the profession with reference to other states, but what do we call thisβhappening in the heart of Delhiβs legal circuit? Recommended by a family friend, no less. Iβm beyond disappointedβ¦..
I think it helps if you have either briefed them before or interned with them at some point and done a good job.
Please everybody do help !
Regards!
The foreign judges may have been visiting for another event and were invited to the swearing in as a courtesy. Not seen this before in my 2+ decades at the bar, but not all that surprised.
Iβm 27 and currently working as a Law Officer in a central government (posted in a PSU). I plan to leave this job soon and move to enter litigation and later prepare for the higher judiciary exams. I understand there are practice-period requirements for judicial elevation and that Iβll likely need several years of practice (around 7 years of meaningful litigation experience to be competitive for higher judiciary).
Questions Iβd like real-life answers to:
1. Will resigning a central government post (to take up litigation) be viewed negatively when I later apply for the higher judiciary? Will it be held against me by selection committees or peers?
2. Are there examples of civil judges or High Court judges who started their careers as government servants (central/state/PSU) and later moved into litigation and were eventually elevated? If yes, please share names/timelines/links if possible.
3. Practical issues: did you face problems with seniority, credibility, client acquisition, or perceptions in court after switching from a government legal post to private practice? Any tips to smooth the transition?
4. Any advice on building a litigation profile while in a PSU role so the eventual transition and judiciary application wonβt look weak?
I want actual people, at least those who closely observed it or know about such switch. Please mention state/High Court (if comfortable).
Thanks, Iβll read every genuine reply. If you want to roast my plan, be constructive about it.
How about a WA group of A0-A4? I am sure we'll be able to find a subset from the group to hangout after office or on weekends.
But you have identified the real problem: NLUs currently suffer from functional governance, campus peace, and the ability to address issues on merit. Unacceptable. What we desperately need is to transform student elections into miniature general elections complete with booth captures, external funding, and the replacement of campus concerns with national political theater. So yes, it is absolutely "high time" we imported this spectacular system. Or, here is a radical thought: if you want campus politics as a farm league for party cadres where student welfare is subordinate to party manifestos, go to DU.
So, I am guessing that the answer should be a 'yes'.
1. NLSIU
2. NLUD
3. NALSAR
4. NUJS
5. GNLU
If not here, then would you place it above NLUJ and NLIU? Or even lower, alongside RMLNLU, RGNUL etc?
So what's next with OVN. Gatekeeper making moves to outwit NanRaj?
I trust this message finds you in good health. I would like to sincerely thank you for your invaluable feedback on my recent post. In retrospect, it is clear that while I was seeking advice on a separate aspect, it was indeed the far more pressing matter of my spelling that demanded urgent attention. I am grateful that you were able to identify this critical gap in my professional development.
Please rest assured that, going forward, I shall exercise greater vigilance while drafting messages for an internet forum, so as to not attract unwanted people, such as your honourable self, ever again. Your timely guidance has served as a reminder that linguistic precision is paramount, even when soliciting help on a casual basis. I sure would love to see your WhatsApp messages and learn and punctuation(s) next!
Warm regards,
OP