We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Imagine my surprise when I discovered that the same firm is now quietly acting for the opposite party in a connected NCLAT appeal, mere months later. Their attempt to stay invisible collapsed when their signature appeared in the comments of the appeal PDF. The filing is happening through another firm.
We often talk about ethics in the profession with reference to other states, but what do we call this—happening in the heart of Delhi’s legal circuit? Recommended by a family friend, no less. I’m beyond disappointed…..
Also ensure you have full material to show the unethical act cause law firms or big shot lawyers are insecure when their practices are discussed openly and they'll definitely file a defamation suit against you.