We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
On to my query:
Iโm set to join the disputes team at a mid-sized firm upon graduation, having received a pre-placement offer last year. The in-hand compensation would be around โน1 lakh per month.
At the same time, I may have a chance at another firm in a similar tier that offers slightly higher pay (around โน1.3 lakh per month). However, pursuing this would mean declining my current offer, with the risk that I may not convert the second opportunity and end up without a job at graduation.
Is the difference in pay worth giving up a secured offer? Is โน1 lakh in hand sufficient to live comfortably in Delhi, especially while managing loan repayments and trying to save for an LLM abroad? Would it be more sensible to stick with the current offer and consider switching after 1โ2 years of experience?
I also canโt help but compare with peers who are on track to earn significantly more (โน18โ24 LPA), which adds to the uncertainty.
Would appreciate any perspectives on this, especially given the current job market.
Seriously considering this. As Indian markets have been on an endless downslide, thanks to Modi Uncle and Nirmala Tai's Communist-style taxes and total lack of reforms. Bashing Nehru yet copying his Soviet-style econ policies.
When comparing your options, the distinction is critical. One path involves a heavy, demanding workload, but it remains a professional environment. The alternative, however, is a minefield: it is defined by a culture of gross incompetence, where advancement is reserved for sycophants who prioritize 'bootlicking' over substance. In that team, you will face relentless micromanagement, a suffocating level of office politics, and constant obstructionism that makes even the simplest tasks unnecessarily difficult.
While the former path requires endurance, the latter requires you to sacrifice your professional integrity and peace of mind. Choose wisely.
Make it make sense
URGENTTT!!!
I also suffer from OCD and it makes my matter worse. Either I am working or battling my OCD every waking second of my life. I have tried counselling. I have tried ACT therapy, life gets better for a week then I relapse back to my own thinking pattern.
I have a small kitty who is dependent on me. I do not want to lose him.
Iโm a 2025 law graduate currently practicing in Delhi across the Delhi High Court, Supreme Court, and district courts. Iโve been working for nearly a year in the chamber of an AOR, gaining exposure to litigation and court procedure.
Iโm now considering applying to Tier 1 law firms for a position in their disputes team. However, I do not have Tier 1 law firm internships. My internship experience includes firms such as Economic Law Practice, Phoenix Legal, Barucha, and Crawford & Bailey, but not directly with disputes teams there.
Given this background, I wanted to understand:
- Whether Tier 1 law firms typically consider candidates with around one year of PQE in litigation practice for associate roles in their disputes teams.
- How much weight is given to prior internships versus actual court practice experience in such transitions.
Additionally, I have a related query regarding a colleague:
- A friend of mine, also with similar PQE, is practicing in a relatively new and lesser-known chamber. How might this impact his chances when applying to Tier 1 law firms?
Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
I really appreciate the great battery life and build quality that Macbooks offer, however these compatibility issues (supposedly) scare me a bit. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
P.S. - Do softwares like Acrobat or other apps from Adobe work fine?
Folks in CM can't hide the truth in the smiles :-p
:)
One as of yet
What makes you think the students of GLC do not have "potential and calibre"?
Better to give MHCET again and try to make it into GLC rather than live your life in such a โฎโฎโฎ way.
Wishing you the best.
Sincerely,
Disappointed.
From what I've heard across other industries, job-hopping tends to be correlated with higher incomes as companies tend to offer more competitive rates to someone joining the company externally, rather than talent that is being promoted within the company.
However, I've heard law firms tend to pay more standardised rates based on your seniority/practice area (excl. bonus). I was wondering if this was correct, additionally if so, is switching across firms (in similar tiers) for purely a higher salary something that happens in corporate law firms or are switches more because of things like team/culture/city etc?
Thanks in advance!
1. S&R - 2
2. AZB - 1
3. Trilegal - 1
And stipend to interns ?