We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Both these actors are well known chameleons. But this isn't the case to undo them. Played a weak hand.
Why is the new govt going soft on so many others, such as Soham C ( Chinar Park incident among others), Dev (returning money and doing films with Mithun C shouldn't mean forgiveness), Sayoni G, Nusrat, Ankush and the list goes on.
If serious pursuit (as opposed to persecution) is made then Hisab will be done. Otherwise it is just painting pictures on the wall with something similar sounding with P.
But why do the Greens remain mum that it is the Unnao and Hathras case veterans who have ensured that RGK is likely to remain yet another case of "we know but cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt".
Today the Cal HC DB hearing the RGK matter ordered CBI to constitute a SIT to look into the alleged lapses of the CBI investigation.
I find the silence of the Saffron brigade stunning. No reaction to the points raised in the HC nor the expose by Justice Abhijit Ganguly.
I also find it extremely telling that a certain Green affiliated lawyer confidently taunted Saffron bros to pursue call records etc of CBI investigators Pahuja and Meena.
Why is the media quiet about all this? Just mere reporting no probing?
These are all a0, a1ssโฆโฆ
How are such practices acceptable?
What the traditional Bombay solicitor route used to be
------------------------------------------------------
Historically, especially in Mumbai:
- You did an LL.B.
- You clerked/articleship under a solicitor firm
- You passed the Bombay solicitor examinations conducted by BILS
- Becoming a โSolicitorโ carried major prestige in commercial practice
In the pre-liberalisation era, many elite commercial lawyers in Mumbai came through this path.
After the creation of the NLUs โ especially National Law School of India University, NALSAR University of Law, The West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, and others โ the recruitment model shifted.
Today, the dominant elite corporate-law path is:
1. Top NLU
2. Campus placement
3. Associate at a top-tier firm
4. Senior associate
5. Partner track
Firms like:
- AZB & Partners
- Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
- Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.
- Khaitan & Co
- Trilegal
mainly recruit through internships and campus pipelines now.
So is the BILS exam โrelevantโ?
-------------------------------
### Still relevant for:
- Traditional Mumbai solicitor culture
- Certain legacy firms and practitioners
- Lawyers wanting additional commercial-law prestige
- People who enjoy structured transactional training
- Some in-house/corporate credibility contexts
### Less relevant for:
- Getting into top-tier firms initially
- Litigation careers
- Modern NLU-driven recruitment
- General practice outside Mumbai
- Partnership track in most modern firms
A top NLU graduate with strong internships generally has far more market leverage today than a non-NLU lawyer who merely cleared the solicitor exam.
โโโโโโโ-
Do you agree with the reply? If itโs true, then why the fuss with this exam? Yes, it has a low pass rate, but then the top law graduates are probably not giving this exam anyway, so wonโt it obviously have a low pass rate?
(boโ27 delhi ncr)
basically i want to know which firms might be hiring more actively, more generous with ppoโs or have vacancies so that i can invest accordingly and have a better shot.
if you have any other tier 2โs in mind, pls share
Even one senior girl who was the most beautiful girl in college looks worn and wrinkled, like she probably goes to sleep at 4 am everyday.
We wonโt stay beautiful forever, but we can surely try and stay healthy? This doesnโt look healthy to me. Is it worth it, just to earn more money?
No.
It was a firm that was known for its ability to retain employees but those days are long gone. There have been layoffs at the associate level and the increments/bonuses (unless you're chummy chummy with the partners in question) have been abysmal.
I know someone who worked there for 4.5 years and was denied their promotion for no apparent reasons. You either kowtow and become a partners pet, or you sit and grind but are never truly appreciated.
There are better places, that will pay you more for the same work that Tuli asks of you. You just gotta look.
NALSAR folks will now
Recommendations involving counsel who treat juniors as humans + Counsel who do not lie through their teeth + Counsel who do not insult juniors + Counsel who do not blame juniors for no fault of theirs are highly appreciated even though it is extremely utopian-ish. (Still holding on to the belief that there are some such lawyers in the profession)
Even if there aren't such counsel, chambers with good litigation work of such branches would be highly appreciated.