Moily wants India to \"capture the global legal market\"

Law-Minister-Veerappa-Moily_thumb
Law-Minister-Veerappa-Moily_thumb
Law and Justice Minister Veerappa Moily wants India to “become the resource reservoir of the global legal fraternity” after upgrading the quality of its legal education system.

Moily told Kolkata-based broadsheet The Telegraph in an interview published yesterday: “Once our lawyers are trained to be the best… they can capture the global legal market.

“Issues such as entry of foreign lawyers into India will then become irrelevant.”

He did not elaborate on the precise steps and timescales needed to improve the training of lawyers. A total of 15 and 25 of India’s law schools were ranked last week by two national magazines.

“We will become world leaders in the legal field, like we are in IT,” Moily explained to the paper, adding: “Bangalore became an IT hub after the quality of engineering education was improved in Karnataka.”

“If I have my way,” he added, “India will become the resource reservoir of the global legal fraternity.”

Anglo-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto hit the headlines last week when it saved $1m in little more than a month by outsourcing its legal work to a Delhi-based legal process outsourcing centre.

Several international law firms such as Clifford Chance also operate sizable offshore legal centres in India, to provide paralegal and low-level legal services to clients at a lower cost.

Moily also spoke to the Telegraph of tackling social equality and corruption in the judiciary.

Since taking the post Moily has publicly made statements in favour of liberalisation although his first meeting with the Bar Council on 8 June did not suggest that an agreement would be reached soon.

Comments

hear hear 22 Jun 2009, 10:01
+0 -0
Watch out London, watch out NY, watch out HK - we are coming!
Anon 23 Jun 2009, 06:35
+0 -0
Look at this minister! He wants India to capture global legal market, but feels shy of talking commitment and schedule for opening of India's own legal sector! I hope he does not intend to make India a global resource hub for stenography work for global lawyers! He seems to be happy that CC has set up an offshore centre here for carrying out stenography and secretarial work for its lawyers abroad. What a pity !
V P Taneja 23 Jun 2009, 08:23
+0 -0
lethargic corrupt system with saleable judgements ;adjournments at whims and fancies of advocates ,needs to rattle its own legal fraternity make it efficient worthwhile,make courts clean presentable bring all proceedings on internet ,create total transparency,have more judges.make litigants pay heavily and liberal compensation to opponent for delaying the legal conclusions.Advocates need to be disciplined answerable to litigants attend court on behalf of lititigants regularly fand be punished for absentia
@ 24 Jun 2009, 09:47
+0 -0
completely agree with 141

The manner in which those words were spoken hint at what might be his complete satisfaction in being able to provide predominantly clerical jobs to the bulk of law school graduates. Again, they seem to be aiming for populist measures by seeking to single mindedly boost the employment rate in a sector where the sweatshop-approach of employing people by the millions doesn't always pay long-term dividends. Law schools are about receving quality education and not like polytechnic institutes, all due respect to them.
RJ 26 Jun 2009, 07:48
+0 -0
Interesting, if the Hon'ble Law Minister is comparing law practice to LPO/IT, the future of this noble profession is anybody's guess! These are two completely different aspects. LPO is not law practice. The debate is about law practice, not about outsourcing/stenographer work at LPOs. Perhaps, the Minister means that if all Indian lawyers become stenographers and join LPOs, there would be no one in the courts, and therefore no opposition to entry of foreign lawyers without reciprocity.
anon 10 Jun 2011, 09:55
+0 -0
Mr. Minister if you think indians have the potential to be global leaders and have enough abilities then why is the govt so hesitant in liberalizing the legal sector and permitting foreign firms in setting their offices??????????