The QLTS replaced the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test (QLTS) and Qualified Lawyers Transfer Regulations (QLTR) yesterday and is required to allow overseas lawyers to become qualified as solicitors in England and Wales.
An SRA spokesperson told Legally India: “The SRA conducted a survey of international Law Societies and Bars at the end of April and none of those contacted in India have yet responded.”
“Only those jurisdictions whose regulatory bodies have replied and been assessed as meeting the SRA's criteria have been included on the list that appears on the SRA website www.sra.org.uk/qlts.”
He confirmed that Indian qualified lawyers would not be able to apply to be admitted to the UK, unless they had previously made a valid application for admission under the QLTT or QLTR rules before 1 September. However, he added that the SRA was “keen to point out” that it is only because the Indian regulator had not responded to the survey and that there were “other notable omissions” such as Canada and New York.
Indian law school graduates who get recruited by London law firms will generally have to pass the QLTS during or after their training contract.
“The QLTS covers lawyers from a wider range of jurisdictions than under the previous arrangements. A list of recognised jurisdictions is now available,” stated the SRA’s website. Many non common-law jurisdictions from Europe, Asia, Africa and South America are included on the list, including Zimbabwe, Hong Kong and Nepal, although Pakistan is also missing from the list.
The SRA spokesperson added: “We would advise lawyers in jurisdictions that have not been included, to encourage their Bars or Law Societies to either complete the survey or contact us if they need a survey to be sent.”
The SRA would be unable to act until it had received those surveys and it was up to the regulatory bodies in jurisdiction to take action, he said. Inclusion on the list “would not be automatic” and “criteria would have to be assessed”. “However, the original surveys were only sent out at the end of April and already many countries are included on the list, so response time on the SRA's part is quite swift,” noted the spokesperson.
“I could not put a timescale on [the process] but can say that any communications will be dealt with as swiftly as possible,” he added.
One BCI insider contacted by Legally India was unaware of the development and unable to comment, while the BCI’s chairman and solicitor general Gopal Subramanium was unavailable for comment at the time of going to press. He was appointed to the BCI’s chairmanship in mid-April.
Indian laws do not permit foreign nationals to practise law in India unless the country has a reciprocal arrangement and allows Indian lawyers to practise in that respective country.
UPDATE 2 September 18:12: Gopal Subramanium commented: "I was unaware of any attempt from the SRA to contact us."
"I am taking steps to rectify the oversight immediately and will be in touch with the SRA on an urgent basis. Please reassure the community that I was not apprised and will attempt to ensure that Indian candidates will not be prejudiced," he told Legally India by email.
Thanks to Legally India blogger ratiojuris for first alerting the development.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
"I am taking steps to rectify the oversight immediately and will be in touch with the SRA on an urgent basis. Please reassure the community that i was not apprised and will attempt to ensure that Indian candidates will not be prejudiced," he told Legally India by email.
Drop in an email(followed by a reminder)at the email add provided on the BCI's website and wait for a response for eternity. These guys simply couldn't care.
(BTW, funny that the BCI has a website - but they don't want lawyers/law firms to have one!)
Go for it and let U.K,U.S,Canadian lawyers pass our exam ?
Now we are at par with them.
"...The role of Mr. Adebare is slightly different since he is stated to be a Nigerian national without any authorization or license to practice law in India". [http://itcases.blogspot.com/2006/05/diljeet-titus-vs-alfred-adebare-and.html]
Mr Adebare from what I have heard was formerly the right hand man of Mr Titus - and indeed had a very successful "law practice" in India.
Will the BCI care to comment on this? I don't think we have any reciprocity regarding practise of law with Nigeria.
Do readers know anything more about this case - esp. the issue of Mr Adebare merrily practising law in India - without apparently being authorised to do so?
- implied that there is no corruption in India, including in the courts
- implied that legalised betting causes corruption, whereas no one in India, where betting is illegal, ever indulges in betting
- expressed a view that betting is immoral, in a country in which we have the run up to one of our major festivals dedicated to furious gambling
Thereby demonstrating one or more of the above:
- you are mad
- you have been living under a rock for most of your life
- you have access to a superior quality of class-A drug
- you are a hypocrite
- you are blind to the failings of your own country, which include rampant corruption at various levels of government and society.
have a nice weekend.
Regarding Mr Adebare from Nigeria I agree he should be banned but as per law he can practise as he did LLB from India. But UK people can never practice as they have degrees from UK colleges. Those who are supporting the magic circle firm tell them to do LLB from India also. If they have so much money they can afford to spend few thousand rupees.
Family-owned firms in India are up to no good either, I agree. But English firms come with racial discrimination, which is certainly less acceptable!!!!
That also reveals your IQ level (may be in single digit) as you cannot even read a simple hidden message therein.
Suddenly your are all up agaist corruption & offcourse BCI...as you are affected by the move.Now you are down-the-line amongst the loosers whom you have taunted as you thought to live a happy life in a foreignland.
Best of Luck..Lucky Looks.
The English wont get the scope to be racist in our country. Because the people who will be working are all Indian.
And to all the SILF agents posting on this board....get a life.
WE WANT FOREIGN LAW FIRMS IN NOW!!!!!
(i) they expect most of their good professionals to defect immediately. A lot of people will be surprised if they know how many of the big hitters in Indian law firms have or have had applied to foreign firms already!
(ii) Foreign clients will not even think twice before moving their big mandates to their international relationships
(iii) Local Indian clients have already spoken their mind. Google statements by Ambani's Bharat Vasani, Essar head legal
(iv) Finally when Indian lawyers will realise the bad work environment and complete lack of professional development they will vote with their feet and it will be too late for the local firms to even figure out how to improve work environment, let alone do anything meaningful by then.
thus, the family and even sole owners will keep resisting the opening up of the market- understandable since it is the question of loosing their livelihood, power, reputation and the way of life!
Mr.#9's comment is more amusing than idiotic ('Commun.' comment), don't grade it low, let it be displayed vis a vis civilized? comments of Mr.#10 and Mr.12, Mr. # hats off to your nice commentary.
these foreign firms will only come to service clients well. and make money. and do quality work. and have meritocratic systems. and pay well. and treat associates like people. and give regular training. and opportunity to work in international offices. and share knowledge. all of which, as anyone with half a brain knows, is just a recipe for disaster. and an excuse for racial subjugation. and very un-indian. i mean, what if other lawyers in the market start to think??? down with foreigners and their law firms. in any case, english food sucks, so what good will come with their law firms?
WE WANT FOREIGN LAW FIRMS IN NOW!!!!!"
#25 - recite the above mantra "we want foreign law..." morning, evening and night. It will do wonders to your legal acumen.
You could also wear an armband, a headband emblazoned with this mantra - not to forget the T-shirt on weekends --- WE WANT FOREIGN LAW FIRMS IN NOW!WE WANT FOREIGN LAW FIRMS IN NOW!WE WANT FOREIGN LAW FIRMS IN NOW!
Till of course an annoyed bystander (officious bystander?) tells you to shut up - and get a life!
Writing on the wall: Shri Lalit Bhasin and SILF stands tall!!
Also, Indian lawyers need to pass an English test and get a visa to the UK as pre-requisite to sit the exams.
The SRA is merely trying to avoid lawyers from poor countires to become English solicitors.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first