Subscribe for perks & to support LI

Your Interests & Preferences: Personalise your reading

Which best describes your role and/or interests?

I work in a law firm
I work for a company / in-house
I'm a litigator at the bar
I'm a law student
Aspiring law student
Save setting
Or click here to show more preferences...

I am interested in the following types of stories (uncheck to hide from frontpage)

Firms / In-House
Legal Education

Always show me: (overrides the above)

Exclusives & Editor's Picks

Website Look & Feel

Light Text on Dark Background

Save preferences

Note: Your preferences will be saved in your browser. You can always change your settings by clicking the Your Preferences button at the top of every page.

Reset preferences to defaults?

Saikrishna assembles with AZB, TTA-Dhall to secure Avengers Age of Ultron release over digital projection CCI complaint

What happened at the CCIWhat happened at the CCI

Saikrishna & Associates won the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) approval for the Walt Disney movie Avengers: Age of Ultron, securing its release in theatres today after the CCI failed to find anti-competitive behavior by the Hollywood producers.

Saikrishna managing partner Saikrishna Rajagopal led with competition law partner Subodh P Deo and Radhika Seth, Associate.

K Sera Sera Digital Cinema, through advocate Sudhanshu Batra, had informed the commission that Digital Cinema Initiatives (DCI) - a joint venture between Walt Disney, Fox, Paramount, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Universal and Warner Bros - was formed to monopolise India’s digital cinema exhibition market by releasing its movies in India only in digital form through DCI compliant servers and projectors, hence forcing Indian digital cinema technology businesses to adhere to DCI standards even if other technology was better, reported the Business Standard.

AZB & Partners Delhi competition law partner Samir Gandhi acted for Sony Pictures Entertainment and Talwar Thakore & Association (in collaboration with Vinod Dhall), through Vinod Dhall, acted for Fox having briefed senior advocate Amit Sibal.

K Sera Sera told the commission that it has its equipment installed at over 300 theatres in India at a cost of Rs 1,50,000 per theatre, catering to over 100 million viewers in India.

However the CCI noted in its order that DCI-compliant technology was better than non-DCI compliant as far as quality and security is concerned, and it is harder to pirate.

The respondents also argued that DCI standards were voluntary and openly available on its website, and were not mandatory to follow for co-exhibitors to gain a license to exhibit their content. It is just that the uniform specifications for digital cinema ensure that the product and services of all industry participants are compatible, secure and interoperable.

The commission noted that no infringement of Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act 2000, as alleged by the informant, seemed to have taken place.

K Sera Sera Age of Ultron CCI order


Click to show 6 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
Like +4 Object -1 Observer 24 Apr 15, 23:17
So Dhall won one and lost one this week - Kian interesting that you don't cover Dhall's losses in the huge Saint Gobain /Gujarat Gas matter.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Observer 24 Apr 15, 23:18
Also I thought Gandhi was based in AZB Delhi? Has he moved or is it an error.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Anon 25 Apr 15, 22:41
It's an error. Gandhi is based on AZB Delhi. Though he has a team each in the Delhi and Mumbai offices. So maybe his Mumbai team worked on this deal.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 kianganz 25 Apr 15, 22:44
Sorry, that's an error of course - no idea why we wrote Mumbai. Gandhi is based in Delhi, have corrected...
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Lawyer 27 Apr 15, 06:57
Pls read the order carefully. Mr. Samir Gandhi represented Warner bros. sony pictures was represented by p&a law offices.
Reply Report to LI
Like +0 Object -0 Guest 27 Apr 15, 09:25
Slight correction. Mr. Samir Gandhi represented Warner Bros. Sony Pictures was represented by P&A Law Offices.
Reply Report to LI

Latest comments