•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences

Lalit Bhasin, SILF’s staunchest liberalisation opponent, suggests 5-7 year roadmap for foreign law firm entry

Bhasin: Getting softer on foreign firms?
Bhasin: Getting softer on foreign firms?

Lalit Bhasin, the chairman of the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) – a law firm lobby group that was formed in part to oppose the entry of foreign lawyers to India – has written in a Business Standard column that he was now in favour of allowing the phased entry of foreign law firms, barely weeks after a report quoted an unnamed government official saying that the commerce ministry was finalising a proposal to allow phased entry of foreign law firms.

Conceding a long-made argument by foreign law firms, Bhasin said it was “unlikely” that litigation lawyers would be adversely affected by the entry of foreign law firms.

He added that in the last 20 years the legal profession has “grown in stature” and was better placed to compete with foreign law firms “subject to the approval” of the Bar Council of India (BCI):

We suggest a phased sequential approach for entry of foreign legal consultants and law firms into India over a period of five to seven years.

Under Phase I, there is a need to reform the environment for domestic firms. This would include removal of difficulties in the LLP format. The Bar Council of India must clarify that practice of law in LLP format is permissible. There has to be clarification from the Income-Tax department that conversion of partnership firms to a LLP is not a taxable event. Bar Council rules need to be amended to permit issue of firm brochures, websites, directory listings, sponsorship of events, and other means of market development and information dissemination for a firm.

After completion of Phase I, foreign lawyers and foreign law firms may be permitted to have presence in India subject to certain conditions, such as prescribed qualification criteria, practise only their "home country" law, prohibited from practising, directly or indirectly, law of India. In the third phase, foreign law firms and lawyers may be allowed to practise, directly or in joint venture with Indian firms, in certain areas of law of India, subject to disciplinary jurisdiction of the Bar Council. Among other things, this has to be on a reciprocity basis - the ability of Indian lawyers to practice in the foreign jurisdiction on similar terms and conditions.

Bhasin has been one of the most vocal and unequivocal opponents of the entry of foreign firms, though in 2012 he was more pragmatic than the BCI view that foreign lawyers should not even be allowed to fly-in and fly-out of India for business.

In another column in the Business Standard today, Amarchand Mangaldas Delhi senior partner Pallavi Shroff made a similar argument, concluding that several issues, such as limiting professional misconduct liability and ensuring the foreign law firms would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Advocates Act and BCI, still stood in the way of the growth of “truly large-scale and global Indian firms”.

She also added that the restrictions on law firm websites should be removed to create a level playing field.

She concluded that “until some of these issues are resolved, the question of opening up of legal sector to foreign law firms is premature”.

Click to show 6 comments
at your own risk
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.