If you are OP, doesn't sound like you are 'conflicted and confused' at all, as you professed, but have pretty strong and set opinions on the topic? As mentioned below, your original headline was also disingenuous (as potentially this entire thread was, as not appearing a call for a genuine and balanced and unheated discussion)?

The original headline was distorting the tenor of the post and seemed designed mostly to incite outrage: she did not directly espouse secession in her post, she just said (as quoted by OP) that all people have a right to self-determination (accurate and something no one would dispute), and that dreaming of secession does not a terrorist make (also correct, right?).

If you want to genuinely discuss the legal issues, rather than turning this into a WhatsApp family chat or Republic TV prime time, then the softer and less sensationalist headline should not stop you (or cause such outrage).

As you were, have fun :)

Sure, that might be very true, though we're not aware of the gender, age or identity of the other mods :) But we also deploy various technical means to regularly identify and block spammers and actors posting disingenuously, and that post was flagged by those systems.

If you have any technical reason that you know of that the post might have been flagged incorrectly, please let us know.