We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHEgb8ZSA1c&feature=youtu.be
If I were Adish, I would have walked out of the interview. The reason why no one from the BJP will give Sreenivasan Jain the time of day is because he isn't dishing news; he's smearing the country, internationally. He's toing the editorial policy at ALJAZEERA, which is SMEAR INDIA COME WHAT MAY. Dare he do such a documentary on any Arab Middle East Dictatorship. They'll sort him out in a day.
He's such an ideological fraud and sell-out; he won't even hold a substantive interview with Rahul Gandhi before this election. I am willing to bet my last dollar on this! Fun fact - The last time he interviewed Rahul G was in the previous election and that too for hardly 5 minutes! That interview had only softballs! No surprises there.
I'll tell you why he won't hold a substantive discussion with Rahul - he knows perfectly well that a substantive discussion with that man can and will result in a repeat of his (Rahul's) unforgettable media debacle in the run-up to the 2014 elections. It won't serve Mr. Jain's agenda.
And, mind you, it saddens me to say all this. Through the many episodes of Truth versus Hype, which I watched religiously with the hope of getting honest journalism (over journalism that runs roughshod on Modi for the heck of it), I saw a propagandist. A fool who missed a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to counter the likes of Arnab with substantive and unbiased reportage. To his credit, Sreenivasan can speak and present well. It's all such a shame, honestly! To sell out for an Al Jazeera paycheck which can and will only with trashing your motherland in this abhorrently biased manner is even more unfortunate and shameful...,
Its like queers for palestine - while Palestinians kill the queers in their country
I wonder why no one has done an exposé on Sreenivasan Jain and his close ties with the congress. Both he and his brother, the lawyer, have solid connections in Congress and these connections were milked rather well when Congress was in power.
Al Jazeera like any other media is propaganda channel and many countries and even Arab countries like Egypt has banned them for terrorism support.
Better to ignore these alleged independent journalist and look at ground situation because elections are coming and opposition is gonna cry evm hack like every other election.
If ravish kumar calls himself independent and non biased journalist then Arnab is also non biased journalist. No journalist is non biased nowadays. These same people shut their mouth on sandeshkhali and other incidents which involve hindu victims or supporters who are from BJP which just tells you are biased because a non biased journo would report every incident irrespective of state or party involved