We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Whoever has any evidence, please send.
We know that being in an anonymous space adds complexity. People share things in good faith, and community testimony absolutely matters. But sometimes, especially when topics get heated or political, we also have to think about how quickly misinformation can spread, sometimes unintentionally. So “contested” is our way of saying: this might be valid, but we need more to go on.
And you're right, our sources aren’t perfect. That’s why we don’t delete the content outright unless it’s provably false. “Contested” is more like a sticky note saying, "hey, double-check this before you go ahead with this."
Needless to say, you will also be harming not just the career of your fellow students, but also the reputation of the college. Is that what you want?
So do the sensible thing and delete whatever videos you have taken.
1. UK foreign ministry: @FCDOGovUK
2. UK Government Department for Education: @educationgovuk
3. UK Secretary of State for Education, Bridget Phillipson MP: @bphillipsonMP
4. UK equivalent of Indian PMO (No 10 Downing Street): @10DowningStreet
5. UK Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs (that's the British foreign minister), David Lammy MP: @DavidLammy
This should help cause maximum pressure on the SJA/NUJS admin. It should also be a motivating factor for the relevant Indian authorities to act.
Note to the moderators: All the Twitter handles listed are available to be viewed by members of the public from around the world. No private information has been disclosed. Please verify these handles yourself, if there are any questions.
As for me, I do not have anything to save. I will do buck-and-wing dances the day the downfall of the corrupt TMC-associated, TLC-educated/grade inflated maphia of blockheads comprising admin/SJA who run NUJS happens. Until then, go eat grass.
Can you think of any other university in India where students would unilaterally write to Jagdeep Dhankar’s office and retract an invitation? All because he supported a law which the Supreme Court has also not interfered with? And which now has some justification after the attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh?
Also curious how such rage disappears when it comes to seeking accountability from the admin or the state government.
▮▮▮
Also, I am pretty sure no video clips exist. Even if they do, just move on please.
https://davidlat.substack.com/p/a-prominent-federal-judge-declares